Great post Liz, summed it up perfectly. Of course Scott will comment and come to Alonzo’s defense because Scott knows all when it comes to Scientology, after all he’s a professional. He will correct you, Lara, Aaron (he obsesses on ASL) Nora or any other former Scientologist. He’s the smartest man in the room. Be extra cautious because Scottie goes after women hard, he’ll insult, threaten and harass complete with that fake forced psychotic laugh and the drooling slobbering speech pattern of his. When it comes to confrontation with males he’ll usually yell from a safe distance and when a man gets in his face he’ll curl up in a ball and cry about a panic attack. Just don’t lose sight in the fact that you, Lara, Nora, ASL and the rest of your team have the masses standing behind you, Scottie has a couple hundred angry grannies.
2 months ago
| 28
Well said Liz, not a born in but introduced as a child, thank you from the bottom of my heart ♥️
2 months ago
| 14
All I can say is you make me proud to be a woman. You are taking back the power and calling out someone on their bull shit. You are showing how strong women are. You speak your truth as an advocate and don’t back down. I admire your strength. I know it wasn’t easy to get here but I hope you realize that your voice is being heard. Just had to say this. ❤
2 months ago
| 15
Yeah kelli did a good job of explaining about how he always expects other people to do what he does... its sick. Very well articulated Liz!
2 months ago
| 7
Feeling that “Mom pride” for you again. Well done young lady.
2 months ago
| 11
Agreed. The tech does not acknowledge the category of "children".
2 months ago
| 8
Very well worded response to an uninformed harmful person
2 months ago
| 13
THAT is articulate !! I'm guessing the incel may not do articulate. ⚘️🌷
2 months ago
| 8
oh yes. You are what he needs to (but will, I am sure, refuse) to hear and look at. Love this.
2 months ago
| 11
the irony is he can’t see (or won’t admit to) his own reductionistic “sense making” that’s he’s doing to simplify the cognitive complexity for himself of something he never actually experienced. also, imo, a significant part of his identity is his grievances against people that criticized him because they didn’t like his behavior (kind of like his buddy “THE doa.”)
2 months ago (edited)
| 4
Thank you, Liz. Alanzo drives me mad thinking independent Scn is somehow more benign than CoS. Responses to skinned knees were drills on what I did to "pull it in" - were my shoes tied, was I running too fast, what was the terrain like - no compassion at all, just tech.
2 months ago
| 15
👏👏👏👏 Well said Liz! He doesn’t believe in the teachings of Steve Hassan he said they are har
2 months ago
| 4
Liz Gale
Oh I see Alan is responding to my last video, but he has me blocked so I can’t respond haha that about sums up his character imo.
I’m gonna say it here then:
Hey @AlanzosBlog you’ve spent HOURS AND HOURS telling us born into Scientology ex members how to feell, think and behave. You have hundreds of statements where you say “this is what you HAVE to do…” and “these people NEED to do xyz” and “the right way think think about this is…”
You’ve literally mansplained my own life experience (which I lived and you did not), to me. It’s both hilarious and appalling.
Did you even listen to what @drstevenhassan said? Did you hear it at all? Or you just didn’t like that I was saying it?
You were not born into Scientology. Why are you so interested in being the gatekeeper and the one defining that experience and policing how people talk about their own lived experiences and lives?
Again, lives THEY lived and you DID NOT, HAVE NOT and WILL NOT.
Not to mention, most of the people you condescend to are women. Coincidence? Doubtful. Men who pick on women are usually over compensating for something lol (every woman reading this knows exactly what i mean).
Why do you think you know how it feels and you somehow know better than the people who were there?
I’ve held my tongue, Alan. While you insult and mock and degrade and belittle survivors because (it appears) you’re desperate to be relevant, the rest of us are living our lives with our families and friends and pets and communities. Yet you mock and belittle us for sharing our experiences and trying to advocate for children being treated better.
I don’t get it. What’s your game? What’s your deal? I don’t think it’s for money, because you said you’re broke and live in a garage and don’t have family.
Is it all for attention, Alan? Does it make you feel big to tell people who were locked in rooms that it didn’t happen? That they actually wanted those terminations of pregnancy they begged not to have? Do you get off saying that YOU SQUIRRELED TECH in the course room to protect children so all Scientology isn’t bad?
How many times did you do the purif as a kid? How many times did you receive the CHILDRENS SECURITY CHECK? How many months did you go at a time without seeing your family, raised by an institution?
Better yet, how many children have you raised or been guardian to?
Have you ever even babysat a kid, Alan? And if you say yes, then provide receipts because i want to fact check that any parent would hand over their kid to you.
For the record, if you are advocating for these things, you are preaching abuse and need to be reported as such. And, unlike Scientologists, I take my mandatory reporting duties seriously as an oath i took at 17 when I first started college getting my degree in Child and Family Studies with a specialization in Early Childhood Education… an oath I upheld working 10 years as a lead teacher at a pre-5th auditory verbal school for children with hearing loss, and as a licensed educator with annual ongoing continuing ed, and in my current position as community support.
Reasons Scientology is dangerous for kids:
*childrens security check
*no age appropriate content restrictions in bullbaiting, auditing or ethics
*parents not told about abuse reported in session
*billion year contracts
*forced confessionals as a solution to age appropriate behavior struggles
*false diagnosis in study tech
*cannot receive mental health help
*self blame for accidents, illness and injury
*no private thoughts/no right to self
*forced past life regression
*scientology counselors are mandatory reporters but are NOT reporting abuse to authorities
*making pedos do amends by working with kids
*monetizing trauma by charging for absolving both victims and children
*not reporting SA to authorities but making victims do ethics behavior modification instead
*emotional control- survival and non survival emotions
*considering feelings to be HE&R
*hypnotism in auditing is hidden and no one gives consent
*pain and sex policy letter (children being made to read)
*objectives make a person controllable without their knowledge or consent
*barley formula is scientifically proven to cause malnutrition in babies but is still promoted
*family is an implant and therefore temporary and subject to control rules
*developmetal delays, birth defects and childhood illnesses are seen as the fault of the child and solution is to subject to intense shame based processing
I could literally go on and on…..
I’ll be here waiting for a response (haha not), but I doubt I’ll get one. Not to my face anyway.
I suspect that’d take more courage than Alan has, but maybe he’ll prove me wrong.
I’m not afraid to be wrong. I’m more afraid of children being hurt and not doing anything about it. Worse yet, saying nothing while a so called anti-Scientology activist turns coat and starts preaching how Scientology is actually not the problem, the kids born into it are.
2 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 299