My God is powerful enough to make sure His Word is translated properly.
1 week ago | 1
Here is an idea for you: Review and summarize how different Christian traditions have answered this question of inerrancy. As you get into theology and doctrine the interesting thing is that you will find several conservative views that on the surface seem the same. But when you dig a bit deeper, you will typically find that there are differences. EDIT: Oh, and then of course make a video about it.
1 week ago (edited) | 1
I answered other. The reason is which Bible, what language and what definion of binerrancy. The English translation isn't innerant in Spanish! Not a single word is "correct"! Inerancy isn't in the words but the message. No there is no book in any language that the Bible is printed in that is inerrant if you're definition of innerancy is a perfect book. The Wor of God us interact because that is Yedhua the Christ. My2Cents
1 week ago | 2
I have little doubt that you are familiar with all three Chicago statements.
1 week ago | 0
I'm really not sure what inerrancy means. I hear different explanations from different people. I would have to know what you mean by it before I can say whether or not I believe your version of it.
1 week ago | 0
I guess you mean inerrancy in respect to the original bibletext not in respect to a particular (modern) bible translation or a certain text tradition. Quite a subtle difference i believe
1 week ago | 0
Biblical Studies and Reviews, Stephen Hackett
Before checking the comment I post below, do you think I hold to biblical inerrancy?
1 week ago | [YT] | 47