I'm personally in a middle ground. I would say it equally depends on both the story and characters in a video, like for example the two videos where Gloria had a voice actress. In those videos, it made sense for her to have a voice, and it worked. And of course you have Doomguy, who even though he's canonically spoken (though very rarely), its best in his character if he remains silent, especially since many DOOM fans prefer him to speak through actions. I hope this makes sense!
3 years ago
| 78
In general I do enjoy voice acting but with you (typically) having Pokémon or various horror stuff interacting with Doomguy I think the lack of voice acting works just very well.
3 years ago
| 29
Both options have their charm. Sometimes it is necessary to have Voice actors, but there are occasions when the lack of them gives a more cartoony air that adds a certain humor to the scene. it's just my vision
3 years ago | 3
Communication without voices is easier to convey to a broader group of people, but can require more work and time to get the same message across. Your work is fantastic, which ever you choose I'll support your choice. P.S. don't let your English skills weigh you down, I'd rather see someone try there best then not try at all.
3 years ago
| 6
I see both working depending on what you want to do. However I think you should keep in mind a good part of what makes your animation so unique and interesting is how it expresses so much about the characters and situations with action alone and very little voice acting.
3 years ago
| 7
The one you made with the sleepless Gloria was really cool, kinda threw me out at first since your vids didn't had voice until that one, but it really fitted her the end and it was way cooler to hear her talk
3 years ago (edited)
| 3
You are really talented to tell a story without voice acting. And I like that! Feels more like it is your style. Imo.
3 years ago
| 1
I like how you do these creative videos without using voice actors it makes the video so much more cooler
3 years ago
| 1
I feel like the scorbunny video made the voice acting fit pretty well, so as long as most of the video is just action, the voice acting will work great!!! side note: love your videos, keep up the good work
3 years ago
| 7
I voted for actions alone, as that's my preference, but there may be cases where a voice would make things a lot easier for you as the animator. When there is a voice, I (personally) emphatically prefer Korean with subtitles.
3 years ago | 1
thank you everyone. It has been of great help to me.😀
3 years ago (edited) | 6
Third option: as much VA as you need with the top tier expressive animation
3 years ago
| 0
I would prefer no voice acting, I really like your no dialogue style, but if you want to add it, maybe not on all videos, in order to express a situation better or evolve your work I wouldn't mind
3 years ago
| 5
It depends on the video but, I am generally impressed with stories that are told through body language and actions. On the other hand if there is an idea that can't be entirely told through 'show don't tell' then start speaking because I want to listen damnit. Both? Both. Both, both is good.
3 years ago
| 1
It honestly depends on the video. Both styles have produced great results.
3 years ago | 0
Action showing their expression has a charm that we all fell in love with
3 years ago | 0
Ultimately your the artist, I may prefer without voices however you should do what you enjoy. Voice or not your content is still amazing.
3 years ago
| 1
Doomkemon
I am troubled. About using and not using voice actors.
What do you prefer more?
I can't speak English fluently, so I will use Korean dubbing and English subtitles.
3 years ago | [YT] | 575