Doomkemon

I am troubled. About using and not using voice actors.
What do you prefer more?



I can't speak English fluently, so I will use Korean dubbing and English subtitles.

2 years ago | [YT] | 568



@dreamcorewarlock

I'm personally in a middle ground. I would say it equally depends on both the story and characters in a video, like for example the two videos where Gloria had a voice actress. In those videos, it made sense for her to have a voice, and it worked. And of course you have Doomguy, who even though he's canonically spoken (though very rarely), its best in his character if he remains silent, especially since many DOOM fans prefer him to speak through actions. I hope this makes sense!

2 years ago | 78  

@TheOneWhoReportsForDuty

In general I do enjoy voice acting but with you (typically) having Pokémon or various horror stuff interacting with Doomguy I think the lack of voice acting works just very well.

2 years ago | 29  

@imos_theos

I feel like the scorbunny video made the voice acting fit pretty well, so as long as most of the video is just action, the voice acting will work great!!! side note: love your videos, keep up the good work

2 years ago | 7  

@STH201

Both options have their charm. Sometimes it is necessary to have Voice actors, but there are occasions when the lack of them gives a more cartoony air that adds a certain humor to the scene. it's just my vision

2 years ago | 3

@doomkemon6579

thank you everyone. It has been of great help to me.😀

2 years ago (edited) | 6

@00yiggdrasill00

I see both working depending on what you want to do. However I think you should keep in mind a good part of what makes your animation so unique and interesting is how it expresses so much about the characters and situations with action alone and very little voice acting.

2 years ago | 7  

@Dafaillord

You are really talented to tell a story without voice acting. And I like that! Feels more like it is your style. Imo.

2 years ago | 1  

@6pIrAteSfoRsAle

Communication without voices is easier to convey to a broader group of people, but can require more work and time to get the same message across. Your work is fantastic, which ever you choose I'll support your choice. P.S. don't let your English skills weigh you down, I'd rather see someone try there best then not try at all.

2 years ago | 6  

@michaelwalpole2208

I voted for actions alone, as that's my preference, but there may be cases where a voice would make things a lot easier for you as the animator. When there is a voice, I (personally) emphatically prefer Korean with subtitles.

2 years ago | 1

@ericraululyeetusdelyeetus5028

Honestly, I really like what you do with the limitation of no voice-acting. I believe that, if you do choose to include voices at some point, it should be for important moments. Contrast is a powerful thing, y'know?

2 years ago | 29  

@lonewanderer6172

The one you made with the sleepless Gloria was really cool, kinda threw me out at first since your vids didn't had voice until that one, but it really fitted her the end and it was way cooler to hear her talk

2 years ago (edited) | 3  

@SpartanCJ37

I like how you do these creative videos without using voice actors it makes the video so much more cooler

2 years ago | 1  

@chester1882

Third option: as much VA as you need with the top tier expressive animation

2 years ago | 0  

@robertevansiv2438

I feel whichever you feel more comfortable with

2 years ago | 1  

@silversword101z5

Ultimately your the artist, I may prefer without voices however you should do what you enjoy. Voice or not your content is still amazing.

2 years ago | 1  

@parodyman64

It honestly depends on the video. Both styles have produced great results.

2 years ago | 0

@gameguru7575

Cant/wont vote atm because your animations in particular are a fascinating specimen. Outside of maybe using clips from each of their respective games, your characters benefit from being silent because doomguy and the trainers dont officially speak, not including anime for the trainers. However, even though you are very talented at showing expression through your animations, i know voices can add more expression if done right. Of course, there's the increased cost, editing workload and time, as well as any issues from a falling out, if one were to occur. I say no voice acting, and if anything, add text boxes or subtitles.

2 years ago | 0

@NotZealot

Bro your so close to 100k! i've been watchin you since the first 096 video. How you have evolved

2 years ago | 0

@IMPOTUSx2

the lack of voice-acting works perfectly fine!

2 years ago | 0  

@death502012

You should only use VA's if it really fits the animation. Say a very lengthy video, something that tells a story, or a very funny skit that requires VA. I'm glad that you're asking the right questions here though. I remember when you put up your second video and you remembered to tone down the sfx. Knowing that makes me quite glad because it means we know that you will make the right moves in your future videos. Still, if you want an example of when to use a VA. Mireabeu I think, has a sfm of pyra and mythra vs Kazuya. I would say that is one of the most perfect examples of using a VA.

2 years ago (edited) | 0