Badly needed recap. Last night we hosted a guest who is by far the most out of resonance individual to have been on the channel. Most in the Archaix community have long ago accepted the data showing that we do not live in the fantasy world presented by NASA and establishment science.
Our guest last night has the EXACT same position as Graham Hancock with his Ancient Apocalypse scenario of a single worldwide cataclysm being the answer to all of history’s mysteries instead of the Archaix data that shows these guys are all avoiding six independent civilization ending catastrophes that all happened within the historical record.
I am and will always be respectful to those who walk through the door, but I am by no means expected to believe them. Several items were red flags to me-
a. Making claims of catastrophism but model still using uniformitarian principles
b. Guest was unable to explain or even show an image of distribution of the planets in his model
c. Claiming his model is not heliocentric thus becomes attempt to tell listeners what they want to hear
d. Dismissive of Velikovsky while also claiming he hasn’t read Velikovsky. Hancock and Ancient Apocalypse crowd avoid Velikovsky too
e. Claiming disagreement with Jimmy Corsetti is attempt to tell listeners what they want to hear
f. Claiming disagreement with Graham Hancock is attempt to tell listeners what they want to hear
g. Claiming his electric Apocalypse event was not in Younger Dryas is attempt to tell listeners what they want to hear
h. Claiming he can’t even begin to date such an event and downplaying its dating is gaslighting when also dismissing chronology as relevant
i. Ignoring six major recorded cataclysms in history to claim electric Apocalypse event was not one of them is a red flag
j. Painting picture of electric Apocalypse being so destructive that it changed size of the world and collided with another world and STILL had people survive and able to foment stories that in primitive frames of reference recorded sophisticated scientific concepts is far beyond my own ability at suspension of disbelief
k. I remained quiet, listening, when it dawned on me that my guest had either been briefed on me, had read a file on me or someone was coaching him through his headphones
l. There was a lot about our guest’s model and claims I do not resonate with. I am left with more questions than answers and still have no idea how his system even looks if not heliocentric.
m. Our guest’s model of a single event explaining everything in antiquity is offensive and dismisses a quarter century of research and chronological citations
In conclusion, I think many of us were at this truther level 10 and 20 years ago but almost nothing in what we heard last night comports with what we have since discovered this experience to be. I would not even be surprised if this guy is actually in Graham Hancock’s camp or works for the State Department.
The only real good I see coming out of this interview is that you guys are about to get this video soon that’s going to set all of that shit straight.
Archaix
Badly needed recap. Last night we hosted a guest who is by far the most out of resonance individual to have been on the channel. Most in the Archaix community have long ago accepted the data showing that we do not live in the fantasy world presented by NASA and establishment science.
Our guest last night has the EXACT same position as Graham Hancock with his Ancient Apocalypse scenario of a single worldwide cataclysm being the answer to all of history’s mysteries instead of the Archaix data that shows these guys are all avoiding six independent civilization ending catastrophes that all happened within the historical record.
I am and will always be respectful to those who walk through the door, but I am by no means expected to believe them. Several items were red flags to me-
a. Making claims of catastrophism but model still using uniformitarian principles
b. Guest was unable to explain or even show an image of distribution of the planets in his model
c. Claiming his model is not heliocentric thus becomes attempt to tell listeners what they want to hear
d. Dismissive of Velikovsky while also claiming he hasn’t read Velikovsky. Hancock and Ancient Apocalypse crowd avoid Velikovsky too
e. Claiming disagreement with Jimmy Corsetti is attempt to tell listeners what they want to hear
f. Claiming disagreement with Graham Hancock is attempt to tell listeners what they want to hear
g. Claiming his electric Apocalypse event was not in Younger Dryas is attempt to tell listeners what they want to hear
h. Claiming he can’t even begin to date such an event and downplaying its dating is gaslighting when also dismissing chronology as relevant
i. Ignoring six major recorded cataclysms in history to claim electric Apocalypse event was not one of them is a red flag
j. Painting picture of electric Apocalypse being so destructive that it changed size of the world and collided with another world and STILL had people survive and able to foment stories that in primitive frames of reference recorded sophisticated scientific concepts is far beyond my own ability at suspension of disbelief
k. I remained quiet, listening, when it dawned on me that my guest had either been briefed on me, had read a file on me or someone was coaching him through his headphones
l. There was a lot about our guest’s model and claims I do not resonate with. I am left with more questions than answers and still have no idea how his system even looks if not heliocentric.
m. Our guest’s model of a single event explaining everything in antiquity is offensive and dismisses a quarter century of research and chronological citations
In conclusion, I think many of us were at this truther level 10 and 20 years ago but almost nothing in what we heard last night comports with what we have since discovered this experience to be. I would not even be surprised if this guy is actually in Graham Hancock’s camp or works for the State Department.
The only real good I see coming out of this interview is that you guys are about to get this video soon that’s going to set all of that shit straight.
2 days ago | [YT] | 1,103