Many Thanks Tom. You are among my favorite Torah teachers. Thank you for sharing the knowledge & insightful teachings!
1 month ago | 2
Thanks Tom. Things are moving fast and yup, we are there. Witnesses the destruction of Gaza fufilling Amos to the T. Pray up and cling to Messiah Yeshua. Shalom and God bless you all.
1 month ago | 3
Part 2/2 of Who is the Servant? Deuteronomy 32:1-4 đâGive ear, O heavens, and I will speak; And hear, O earth, the words of my mouth.  Let my TEACHING drop as the RAIN, My speech distill as the dew, As raindrops on the tender herb,   And as showers on the grass. For I PROCLAIM the NAME of the Lord: Ascribe greatness to our God.  He is the Rock, His work is perfect; For all His ways are justice, A God of truth and without injustice;  Righteous and upright is He. The 'RAIN' implied by the Scripture is the TEACHING of the Word or the proclamation of the name of our Lord. And this RAIN has come from above, for it is our LORD who would come to us as the RAIN. This is seen in Hosea 6:3 đThen shall we know, if we follow on to KNOW THE LORD: his going forth is  prepared as the morning; and HE SHALL COME UNTO US as the RAIN, as the LATTER and FORMER rain unto the earth. Who is this Lord who will come to us as the rain sent by our Lord Yeshua? It is the Lord Yeshua, Jesus Christ, who would come thru the Spirit of God who would help us in knowing the Lord. Isaiah 44:3-4 đFor I will POUR WATER on the thirsty land,    and streams on the dry ground; I will POUR my SPIRIT upon your offspring,    and my blessing on your descendants.  They shall SPRING UP among the grass    like willows by flowing streams. The RAIN (TEACHING) is proclaiming the name of the Lord through the Spirit of God bestowed unto us. This coincides with Acts 2:17 đâIn the last days, God says, I will pour out My Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams. For the Spirit that had been poured out in former rain is also the same Spirit that had been poured out in the latter rain Joel 2:28-29 đ âAnd it shall come to pass afterward,    that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy,    your old men shall dream dreams,    and your young men shall see visions. Even on the male and female servants    in those days I will pour out my Spirit. 8. That is why Isaiah 42:1-13 is NOT about the people Israel but is about the Lord. (take note of the verse) Isaiah 42:6-7 đâI, the Lord, have called You in righteousness, And will hold Your hand; I will keep You and give You as a covenant   to the people, As a LIGHT TO THE GENTILES,   To open blind eyes, To bring out prisoners from the prison, Those who sit in darkness from the prison   house. There is only one who can give a light to the Gentiles, and that is the Lord Jesus Christ whom Father gave as a covenant to the people seen in Isaiah 53. This is confirmed in Isaiah 42: 1-13( read the verses) where the chapter verses is talking about the Lord who became man, the Servant of God whom the Spirit of God dwelt. This coincides with Isaiah 11:10 đâAnd in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse, Who shall stand as a banner to the people; For the GENTILES SHALL SEEK HIM, And His resting place shall be glorious.â Are your resting place "glorious" today or before? Who can have a resting glorious place? You? Even if it is in the future, the verse is talking about the Messiah literally who will dwelt in the midst of Jerusalem whose glorious resting place belongs to Him. WHILE in ( take note of the verses) Isaiah 42:18-20 đâHear, you deaf; And look, you blind, that you may see. Who is blind but My servant, Or deaf as My messenger whom I send?     Who is blind as he who is perfect, And blind as the Lordâs servant? Seeing many things, but you do not     observe; Opening the ears, but he does not hear.â This servant in verse 18-20 is described as the 'people Israel.' The servant from verse 1-13 is DIFFERENT from the servant described in verses 18-20 for the purpose of the first servant who had the Spirit of God is to 'OPEN THE BLIND EYES' while the second servant in verse 18 is considered already as 'BLIND SERVANT.' This is one confirmation of the difference of the servant called "MESSIAH," and the servant people Israel called "BLIND." The first servant is the Arm of the Lord while the second servant is the people Israel. These servants mentioned are with different description and purpose from each other. And the Servant who had the Spirit of the Lord had been testified by Jesus Christ in Luke 4:16 -21 đAnd he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up. And as was his custom, he went to the synagogue on the Sabbath    day, and he stood up to read. And the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the     place where it was written, âThe SPIRIT OF THE LORD IS UPON ME,    because he has anointed me    to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives    and recovering of sight to the blind,    to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor.â And he rolled up the scroll and gave it back to the attendant and sat down. And the eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed on      him. And he began to say to them, âTODAY THIS SCRIPTURE HAS BEEN       FULFILLED IN YOUR HEARINGâ You are the 'BLIND' who cannot see nor wanted to see the works of God. You cannot even stand up for him, the one that saves and took off your iniquities. And this all start because you cannot believe that God had sent to be a man and SUFFERED for the forgiveness of your sins as testified by the "seed of the woman" in Genesis 3:15 The 'people Israel' or all created man are DISQUALIFIED for the works in I
1 week ago | 0
With due respect. Continuation on a comment on "Rabbi Tovia Singer destroyed Jew's for Jesus argument on virgin birth." Zechariah 8: 20-23 is the time when the Lord is living with Israel physically and literally, and verse 23 is for a future to come. Total peace and prosperity within Israel for the Lord dwells in the midst of Jerusalem Zechariah 8:3 đâThus says the Lord: âI will return to Zion, And dwell in the midst of Jerusalem. Jerusalem shall be called the City of Truth, The Mountain of the Lord of hosts, The Holy Mountain. That is why verse 23 is only in accordance to the "literal physial presence of the Lord" in regards to the whole chapter. Zechariah 8:23 đâThus says the Lord of hosts: âIn those days ten men from every language of the nations shall grasp the sleeve of a Jewish man, saying, âLet us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you.â â â But today, the physical presence of the resurrected Messiah has NOT yet come. This had been backed up by Zechariah 8:10 đFor before these days There were no wages for man nor any hire for beast; There was no peace from the enemy for whoever went out or came in; For I set all men, everyone, against his neighbor. But today, you are BLIND or wanted to be blind. Do not pick verses and interpret it as a whole. You gathered all the verses and interpret it as one. Tackle first the seed of the woman, the foundation of your belief of a saviour. Who is the seed of the woman who will destroy all evil by CRUSHING the HEAD of the serpent/Satan/adversary? Is it you created Isra
2 weeks ago | 0
With due respect. Just sharing a comment from "Ex- pastor and Rabbi Tovia Singer expose: Bethlehem Birthplace of the Messiah?" 1. Why are you mocking the "star" that guides the wise men to the born King of the Jews? Is it so unrealistic, odd and so 'magical' you think that it happened and they knew it was the Lord that guides them? If that so, you should also mock your ancestors for believing a pillar of a cloud and a pillar of fire that guides them in Exodus 13:21 Exodus 13:21 đAnd the LORD went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them the way; and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night For if you cannot mock your ancestors for believing the guiding cloud and fire, then you should mock yourselves for disbelieving the capability of God to do everything He wants at all time whether it seems to men unrealistic or magical as you think. Everything unrealistic you may think that happened on Jesus time is the work of God as well as everything that happened unrealistic to your ancestors is also the work of God. Everything that had been provided to Jesus is the work of God; same as everything that had been provided to your ancestors like manna and quail. You have not seen them falling from heaven, but we believed it is true. That is why there is no difference with the wise men KNOWING the Lord and the King, and giving precious gifts to the King of the Jews. They are the "witness," they are written and you are just reading. 2. Is it not possible for anyone even in their first meeting to know it is the Lord they had met or seen? Abraham had done that when he saw "three men", and he knew that one of them is the Lord seen in Genesis 18: 2-3 đSo he lifted his eyes and looked, and behold, three men were standing by him; and when he saw them, he ran from   the tent door to meet them, and bowed himself to the ground,  and said, âMy Lord, if I have now found favor in Your sight, do not pass on by Your servant. God can reveal Himself and be known and be acknowledged by them if He wanted to, for He is God who can do whatever He pleased. 3. The ability to forgives sins.. ( as you says). I believe you are insinuating this in relation to the works of Isaiah 53 for you are holding your righteousness to be the saviour in Isaiah 53. You and all created Israelites and all created men are disqualified for all men sinned as Scripture had said. For the Arm of the Lord who suffered in Isaiah 53 had no sin at all by mouth or by action. Isaiah 53: 9 đ..Because He had done no violence, Nor was any deceit in His mouth. This verse disqualified all men. This is a close debate. 4. You want to disprove that Micah 5:2 testified that God will be born from the tribe of Judah who came from of old or from everlasting or from eternity. You insinuate that of old or everlasting or 'ancient time' is just like an old old time in the human history. Would you like also want to disprove Daniel 7: 13-14 ? Daniel 7:13-14 đâI was watching in the night visions, And behold, One like the Son of Man, Coming with the clouds of heaven! He came to the ANCIENT OF DAYS, And they brought Him near before Him.  Then to Him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom,  That all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, Which shall not pass away, And His kingdom the one Which shall not be destroyed. In verse 13, where do you think is the PLACE the verse was talking about? Is the Ancient of Days had something to do with "everlasting?" Does of " old or ancient or eternity" had something to do before the foundation of the world, before the world began? You must answer this. If you read the whole chapter of Micah, you will see that it is the Lord who saves men from adversaries and not just a created man. This support Micah 5:2, the born God from the womb as promised. And this born God is the saviour in whole chapter if Micah 5. 5. Micah is not referring David in Micah 5:2. David is the ancestor of the born God from the tribe of Judah for a. David did not come from ancient days or everlasting b. David will ONLY be resurrected by the Lord or Holy One who resurrected FIRST without decay as said in Psalm 16:10 đFor You will not leave my soul in Sheol, Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption. The Messiah or the Holy One will die and be buried but will not decay. This coincides with Daniel 9:26 đAnd after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be CUT OFF, but not for Himself From this verse, do not insinuate anymore about the created Israelites is the sacrificial offering or the savior in Isaiah 53,for it is very clear that the Messiah had done the saving not for Himself. If you think that created Israelites are the saviour in Isaiah 53, and if you think you removed the iniquities of others, who will removed your iniquities? For the works in Isaiah 53 is for OTHERS, not for himself. If all man sinned, then your iniquities are not removed. If it is not forgiven, then you are bound to eternal punishment. As you believed you had removed the iniquities of others,then others will be saved but you will not be, according to your theory in relation to Isaiah 53. Your theory that the 'created Israelites' is the saving power in Isaiah 53 is wrong. You must humble yourselves before the Lord. This confirmed also Isaiah 53 is the work of the Arm of the Lord. There is still the prophecy in Psalm 110: 1-2 đThe LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool. The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: Rule thou in the midst of thine enemies . The one that had been resurrected is also the one who ascended is also the one who will comeback to make his enemies his footstool. And the only feet that is capable to comeback is from the one who ascended to Father' s kingdom as stated. In Psalm 110:2, Is Zion also called Jerusalem? Jerusalem is the place where Jesus ascended to heaven witnessed and testified by his disciples and also the same place He will come back not to be born by the womb anymore but in the power of God to save Israel and destroy adversaries as coincides with Acts 1:11 đwho also said, âMen of Galilee, why do you stand gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in like manner as you saw Him go into heaven.â That is the time of total Peace, after he comes back as prophecied by Psalm 110:1-2. Isaiah 11 coincides with this. 7. He shall be called a Nazarene. Matthew 2:23 đAnd he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene. One of the prophets spoken by Matthew is Isaiah, specifically Isaiah 53. This is already been revealed by some scholars. Nazareth in Hebrew' s root word is called " netzer". This is the same root word for the word " shoot" or "branch." In Isaiah 53:2, you would see that there is a metaphor Isaiah 53:2 " He grew up before him like a tender shoot,".. In metaphor as searched, there is a figuratively description of the qualities of one thing, that had been carried over to another by using comparison for emphasis or symbolism. This is seen in the verse      "he grew up" and "like a tender shoot". There is already a comparison for symbolism because of the word "LIKE." đąIn literal sense no man can be grown as shoot or a branch, but can only mean that the Arm of the Lord in Isaiah 53 will grew in Nazareth having the root word "branch, or shoot." Matthew is correct. The Arm of the Lord in Isaiah 53 will be called a Nazarene from Nazareth, a shoot or a branch spoken and prophecied by the prophet Isaiah though the word Nazarene had not been mentioned in the Old Testament, but had been prophecied. It had been supported also by Isaiah 53:2 đ..He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him,     nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. Nazareth is known as a small town of low regard or disrepute or low esteem held by the public. Nazarene were not wealthy people nor living in a glamorous life. This is seen how Nathaniel thought about Nazareth âWhat good can come from Nazareth?â (John 1:46). Not only with the public have low regards with Nazareth, but also with the people Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem, but grew up in Nazareth as the Scripture had told. The prophecy for Isaiah 53 is the prophecy for Jesus Christ who GREW up in Nazareth treated by the public in low regard as they treated the Nazarene in low esteem. Jesus Christ is the branch or shoot called "Nazareth" metaphored and prophecied by the prophet Isaiah testified by Matthew. 8. Matthew did not removed your "modifier" origin for you had a wrong interpretation of old or ancient times in human history that negate the seed of the woman, Isaiah 53 and Daniel 7:13 Matthew interprets it as God born as a man in the tribe of Judah who came from everlasting and this Messiah will be born from Bethlehem and grew up in Nazareth testifying Isaiah 53 belongs to the work of Jesus Christ, our Lord Yeshua. 9. You will always insinuate chapter with the powerful ruler, but you will always ignore Isaiah 53 who saves you from eternal punishment. How powerful it can be by removing eternal death in the life of the believers? A blessing life forever with the Lord. You ignore the resurrection testfied by the Isaiah 53 and David in "You will not let your Holy One see decay, " and also his ascension and coming back in Psalm 110: 1-2. This is the Lord you are waiting for, the same Lord who suffered, died.and lived again. This is to prove that Matthew is telling the truth and had not made up stories.You are just blind or trying to be blind. Either you remain blin
3 weeks ago | 0
With due respect. Part 3 just sharing comment from The Church shattered the Torah and New Covenant by Rabbi Tovia Singer Which law you are referring to? For there is the existence of the law in the priesthood of Melchizedek EVEN BEFORE the law of Moses began that you cannot deny for the existence of Melchizedek in Abraham' s timeline as a priest of God is the existence of the priesthood and the existence of the law inherent in the priesthood. We reason out first with the law of Moses regarding "curse" as what you discussed. 1. Christians are not against the law of Moses. If the Jews wanted to take the law as your salvation, you have to keep all the completeness of the law, for if you break just one of them, you are already considered cursed. And this is the agreement the Israelites had done in Deuteronomy 27:26 đ âCursed is the one who does not confirm ALL THE WORDS OF THIS LAW by observing them.â âAnd ALL the people shall say, âAMEN!â â This had been referenced by Paul in Galatians 3:10 đFor as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, âCursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.â This had been confirmed in Daniel 9:11 đYes, ALL Israel has transgressed Your law, and has departed so as not to obey Your voice; therefore the CURSE and the OATH written in the Law of Moses the servant of God have been POURED OUT ON US, because we have sinned against Him. Daniel is DECLARING that ALL Israel had transgressed the law on his time, then it means that all Israel on the works of the law is under curse or the curse had been poured to Israel by God. If ALL MAN had sin as the Scripture had said, if all Israelites had sin then it means that all men IF IN the works of the law, are all under curse. It is the same with what Paul had said and is accordance with the Scripture had said in Deuteronomy 27:26. So I asked you, "have you not sin?" Would you like to disagree with: 1 Kings 8:46 đâWhen they sin against You (for there is no man who does not sin) and You are angry with them.... If Daniel had the capability to summarize on his time that all Israel had sin and are under curse for the violation of Deuteronomy 27:26, Can you today not able be like Daniel to summarize that all Israel had sin for the violation of Deuteronomy 27:26 ( if under the law of Moses)? Paul is correct on what he had said in Galatians 3:10. It is from your agreement from the law of Moses, and the agreement of your ancestors that proves that once you had sin, you are considered under curse. Paul must not be mistreated by you for he is only relaying your agreement in the law of Moses. You had become a false witness of him and Jesus Christ. I do think a false witness is a sin in the law of Moses. 2. Galatian 3:13 đChrist has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, âCursed is everyone who hangs on a treeâ), As reiterated, since all man sinned then all men is cursed because men cannot keep up with the law (with regards to those who have the law of Moses). But Jesus Christ is given as the new covenant in Isaiah 53. Jesus Christ also 100% fully fulfilled all the requirements of being a sacrifice and an offering for the redemption of sins. In the law of Moses, anyone who had been hanged is considered a violator of the law, and hanging is a judgment. In Deuteronomy 21, there are different situations. Verse 18-21 is different from verse 22-23 for the violators are in different situations. I believe that this is where Paul referenced: Deuteronomy 21:22-23 đ âIf a man has committed a sin deserving of death, and he is put to death, and you hang him on a tree, 23 his body shall not remain overnight on the tree, but you shall surely bury him that day, so that you do not defile the land which the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance; for he who is hanged is accursed of God. If a man has committed a sin deserving of death, and been put to death, can be/ or is hang on a tree. So anyone who is hung on a tree is considered a violator of the law, and is termed accursed of God or the curse had been poured out on him. Jesus Christ CANNOT BE TERMED 'accursed of God' for Jesus Christ is NOT a violator of the law NOR had any sin THUS is NOT deserving of death. That is why Isaiah 53 declared and confirmed: Isaiah 53:8 đBy OPPRESSION and JUDGMEMT he was taken away.    Yet who of his generation protested? For he was cut off from the land of the living;    for the TRANSGRESSION OF MY PEOPLE he was punished. Since Jesus Christ had NO SIN as testified by Isaiah 53, then he became a sacrificial sin offering for the iniquity of the people. As an animal sin offering had received the sin of the offerer, as the sin had been transferred to the animal, then sin had been judged in the body of the animal through its blood and its death. This is the same when Jesus Christ offered his life, he had received the sins ( curse) of men, and sin (curse) was judged in Jesus body by/through death. Isaiah 53:6 đWe all, like sheep, have gone astray,    each of us has turned to our own way; and the Lord has LAID ON HIM    the iniquity of us all. This is the term "HE BECAME A CURSE FOR US", for the punishment that is FOR US, Jesus Christ had TAKEN it all AWAY from us, for the punishment for our sins had already been judged through HIS death. That is the fulfillment of the sacrificial offering for sin, reconciling us to
2 weeks ago | 0
With due respect. Sharing comment in " An Easter Special: The Cricifixion Psalm- Psalm 22 with Greg Mcbride-1971 "Before I give my reasoning regarding Psalm 22, since you have a "prelude", I will also give my 'prelude'. 1. Before you question the divinity of Yeshua, Jesus Christ, you have to question first your theology about the "seed of the woman" in Genesis 3:15 who will prophecied to destroy the head of the 'serpent.' Can a regular man destroy the 'serpent'? 2. In interpretation of the Bible, you must learn to understand who is the speaker of the verses. One good example is Isaiah 48:16 đâCome near to Me, hear this: I have not spoken in secret from the      beginning; From the time that it was, I was there. And now the Lord God and His Spirit       Have sent Me.â Who is the speaker of the verse who testified he had been sent by Father and His Spirit, who was there also from the beginning? Is it the prophet Isaiah? Can he exist in the beginning together with Father and His Spirit? Tell us who is the speaker of the verse who had been sent confirming his existence together with Father and his Spirit from the beginning. It is very clear that God will be sent to be born from the womb(Genesis 3:15) prophecied since in the beginning and will come out from the tribe of Judah ( Micah 5:2). That is my prelude. đThe Shiloh 'to be sent' dwells in the shiloh (prepared tent or place) specific for him, and to which belongs to him. I believe that this is a foreshaddow of the things to come- the Lord to be sent in a body( tent) of a man. Hebrews 10:5-7 đâSacrifice and offering You did not desire, but a body You prepared for Me.     In burnt offerings and sin offerings You took no delight. Then I said, âHere I am, it is written about Me in the scroll:     I have come to do Your will, O God.â This coincides with Psalm 40:6-8 đ"Sacrifice and offering thou dost not desire; but thou hast given me an open ear. Burnt offering and sin offering thou hast not      required. Then I said, âLo, I come; in the roll of the book it is written of me; I delight to do thy will, O my God; thy law is within my heart.â"  đFor all non-believing Jews ministers, let us reason out together. You proclaimed that there is distortion in the New Testament (Hebrews 10:5-7), in comparison with Psalm 40:6-8. We proclaimed Christians that you had just been blinded by God. Isaiah 8:17 đAnd I will wait on the Lord, Who hides His face from the house of     Jacob; And I will hope in Him God' s Word always leads into One understanding, but if you want verse by verse of Psalm 40:6-8 because of your unbelief, then listen and hear. đđ Psalm 40:6 đSacrifice and offering thou dost not desire; but thou hast given me an open ear.Burnt offering and sin offering thou hast not required. A. If we are going to analyze, the verse is saying that sacrifice and offering is not desired with respect to having an 'open ear'. Using common sense, 'open ear' means Father prefers hearing, listening and obeying rather than sacrifices or burnt offering and sin offering. This is confirmed in 1 Samuel 15: 22-23 đSo Samuel said: âHas the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,      As in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, And to heed than the fat of rams. B. Open ear and body You also proclaimed that there is distortion in the New Testament that saying "you prepared a body" rather than "you had given an open ear" seen in the Old Testament. As "open ear" in Psalm 40:6 is obedience, it is also confirmed in succeeding verse 8, "I delight to do thy will, O my God; thy law is within my heart." It is already self-explanatory that when you obey, you use your whole being to do the will, your body and mind. It had to be executed by your being, you cannot use just simply your literal ear to execute obedience; you can hear, but not obeying. Your ear and mind can listen/hear and process listening/hearing, but it is your body, mind, and will to execute the command. So open ear, body, and obedience coincide with each other. It is the same. C. It is also self-explanatory that when said,  "I delight to do thy will, O my God," this statement is not just for listening or hearing, but this is for an execution of the command, obedience to the will by the use of whole being, not just "ear." Do not make the simple understanding hard, use your common sense so you might able to process what you hear. D. " Open" You have said that 'open' in Hebrew word is called " karah" that had following meanings Strongâs # 03738 like 1) to dig, excavate, dig through     a) (Qal) to dig      b) (Niphal) to be dug So you insist that there is distortion with the word 'karah' and 'open ear.' It is you who made the interpretation of "digging/excavating ear" and not Christians. Where is your common sense? But by God' s grace, it is meant to be " pierced and obedience' as expressed in the same Hebrew word that is seen in Psalm 22:16. If you are going to read Psalm 22, it is representing someone who is executing a will thru obedience. It further means that the one who had higher bearing than sacrifice and offering had been done by the Arm of the Lord who had been pierced in Psalm 22 as obedience to Father in heaven who takes away the sin of the world for those who believe. Psalm 22:16 đFor dogs have surrounded Me; The congregation of the wicked has enclosed Me. They pierced My hands and My feet; And the word 'karah' that had Hebrew meaning of "to dig, excavate, dig through" is the same with someone who had been "pierced" in his hands and feet. It means that an 'open ear/karah' in Psalm 40:6 is the same with 'pierced/karah/to dig/to excavate' seen in Psalm 22:16. E. You may also insinuate that there is other translation for karah in Hebrew word, " like a lion" It is best explained by the Jews ministers in Christ, but then, let me try using my common sense and little research. Even the Bible said, Proverbs 3:21 đâMy child, donât lose sight of common sense and discernment. Hang on to them.â  Proverbs 21:16  đâThe person who strays from common sense will end up in the company of the dead.â Who wants to be dead? It is just written. In Hebrew Masoretic text, it says: âFor dogs have encircled me, an evil congregation surrounded me; like a lion my hands and my feet.â On the other hand, the Lxx translation it reads as "they dug or they pierced" my hands and my feet. Their difference is if the original word ends up with a 'yod or vav.' a. It was written on the scrap of the scroll found in Nachal Hever having the line from Psalm 22:16, that it ended with VAV instead of yod when magnified. It clearly shows that the comparison of " vav/ they dug or pierced" is the same with Lxx translation. b. Using common sense, you cannot understand neither can even align your mind when in the time of suffering and persecution as seen in Psalm 22, the interpretation of "like a lion my feet and my hand." For until now you do not even understand it nor even make sense to it. But insteads, that in the times of suffering and persecution, 'they dug or pierced my hands and my feet' or 'make a hole in my hands or feet' makes SENSE. c. Why you Jews FEARED about the word 'they pierced'? This is the word that is also seen in Zechariah 12:10 "then they will look on Me whom                They PIERCED" It means that there is REALLY someone who had been pierced and through the 'one whom they pierced' , the spirit of grace and supplication will be poured out on you.  Using common sense, through the one 'who had been pierced' in Zechariah 12:10-12 and ' they pierced my hands and feet' in Psalm 22 comes all your healing and blessings. Father in heaven will never confuse you Jews. d. You are afraid of the word' pierced' on his hands and feet for you are seeing Lord Yeshua, Jesus Christ, as the one whom you had pierced; whom your people had rejected and persecuted even without sin; and by his death and resurrection , you had been healed and forgiven as Isaiah 53 told. You are seeing our Lord Yeshua as the Arm of the Lord, that is why you are afraid of the word "pierced." It is Father who is calling you through the One you had pierced to give you grace and forgiveness as expressed by Zechariah 12:10 đâAnd I will pour on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication; then they will look on Me whom they PIERCED. Yes, they will mourn for Him as one mourns for his only son, and grieve for Him as one grieves for a firstborn e. It is not David who had been talked in Psalm 22, for David had not been hated or rejected by his people nor abandoned in death by all Israelites on that time, but instead though many adversities, David had been ADORED and respected by Israelites on those time even in our time that confirmed David had been loved by his people. Even David CANNOT provide the salvation from all iniquities in Isaiah 53. "In peace, our Shiloh obeyed; in peace, our Shiloh accept the punishment for us; in peace, our Shiloh offered his life. In peace, our Shiloh saves us from death; and thus we live thru the Prince of Peace, our Shiloh from the tribe of Judah, the Arm of the Lord, the King of the Jews, our
5 days ago | 0
With due respect. Part 1 Just sharing comment from The Church shattered the Torah and New Covenant by Rabbi Tovia Singer You are wrong in your proclamation that Paul said the law was given by the angels. Galatians 3:19-20 đ... and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator. Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one. đThe verse said that the law was appointed or given BY the HAND OF A MEDIATOR through angels. There is only one mediator between God and man, and that is Jesus Christ 1 Timothy 2:5-6 đFor there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time, That is why it is NOT the angels who had given you the laws but Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Arm of the Lord, who is God sent to be the Son of Man. This coincided Psalm 78 emphasizing the works of God as the inheritor of Israel. Father will never inherit Israel for He owns everything. He is only there to give. It is the Son of God, the one that had been sent from the beginning in Isaiah 48:16 who inherits Israel. Psalm 78:5 đFor He established a testimony in Jacob, And APPOINTED A LAW in Israel,   Which He commanded our fathers, That they should make them known to their   children; So it is clear the verse in Galatian 3:19-20 is referring to Jesus Christ ( by the hand of a mediator), who had been sent from the beginning, who appointed the Law or who had given the law in Israel that coincided with Psalm 78:5 đAccording to the Scripture that wherever the Lord is, his angels are with him like when Abraham seen the Lord in Genesis 18:1-5 đThen the Lord appeared to him by the terebinth trees of Mamre, as he was sitting in the tent door in the heat of the day. So he lifted his eyes and looked, and behold, three men were standing by him; and when    he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them, and bowed himself to the ground, and said, âMy Lord, if I have now found favor in Your sight, do not pass on by Your servant. Please let a little water be     brought, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree. And I will bring a morsel of bread, that you may refresh your hearts. After that you may pass by, inasmuch as you have come to your      servant.â They said, âDo as you have said.â There are 3 men as said, one is the Lord, two are the angels. Our Lord can do whatever He wants for He is God. He can be man if he wanted to in an instant, there is no question about that. Then the two men went to Sodom Genesis 18: 22 đThen the men turned away from there and went toward Sodom, but Abraham still stood before the Lord. These 2 men are two angels as confirmed in Genesis 19:1 đ Now the two angels came to Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. These two angels came to Sodom UNDER the supervision of our Lord. It is the Lord who commanded the two angels, so we could see that the angels of God CANNOT execute WITHOUT the command of God. Angels are there to help in the COMMAND of the Lord Psalm 104:4 đWho makes His angels spirits, His ministers a flame of fire. This coincides with Hebrews 1:7 đAnd of the angels He says: âWho makes His angels spirits And His ministers a flame of fire.â Daniel 6:21 đThen Daniel said to the king, âO king, live forever! My God SENT His ANGEL and SHUT the LIONS' MOUTH, so that they have NOT HURT me, because I was found innocent before Him; and also, O king, I have done no wrong before you.â đIt is also the angel who can be sent to minister or give a message Daniel 10: 12-14 đThen he said to me, âDo not fear, Daniel, for from the first day that you set your heart to understand, and to humble yourself BEFORE YOUR GOD, your words were HEARD; and I HAVE COME because of your words. But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days; and  behold, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I had been left alone there with the kings of Persia. Now I have come to make you understand what will happen to your people in the latter days, for   the vision refers to many days yet to come.â đAngel can also watch over people as seen in Daniel 12: 1 đâAt that time Michael shall stand up, The great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people; And there shall be a time of trouble, Such as never was since there was a nation, Even to that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, Every one who is found written in the book. Angels in the command of God,in God' s appointed time, is also there to protect together with the Lord, who is the Lord of Hosts. đąSo it is clear that angels of God CANNOT execute anything WITHOUT the command of God. So when we see in the Bible about the law and the angels were concerned, it is clear to us that the law is appointed ONLY BY the LORD, who is with the thousands of angels with Him, who has the direct command and authority among all the angels to do according to His command. That is why whatever the angel of God had done in obedience to the command is still considered "the WORK OF GOD and CAME FROM GOD." You may want to reason out with Acts 7:51 -53 đâYou stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit; as your fathers did, so do you. 52 Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who foretold the coming of the Just One, of whom you now have become the betrayers and murderers, 53 who have received the law by the DIRECTION of angels and have not kept it.â There is nothing wrong in Acts 7: 53 "direction of angels," for this is the succession of events: From God, to angel/angels, then to man/men. Angels received directions from God to minister to man. That is why it is reiterated in Hebrews 1:7 As example of Genesis 19, when Lot received message from God and listen to the direction or advice of the angels to leave Sodom for Sodom will be destroyed. Help is given by the angels in the command of God. We knew that angels as exemplified by Michael in Daniel 12: 1 will not do without any command from the Lord. Michael as the the chapter had said that He had stand watching over the sons of Israel until the appointed time had come by the word "At that time Michael shall stand up" meaning defending Israel in the command of our Lord Yeshua So Galatian 3 :19-20 is clear about the HAND OF THE MEDIATOR ( Lord Yeshua/Jesus Christ)is the one who appointed the law and not the angels as you had proclaimed. And you proclaimed wronh. Paul is correct. You just misunderstood him with regards to
2 weeks ago | 0
With due respect. Just sharing comments from Rabbi Tovia Singer, " The AntiChrist and the Jews" 1. As it was written and as what you have said, that there is no king, no priesthood even today, then it means you ( either in the 'order of the Saducees or Pharisees') are NOT OPERATING under the Law of Moses. For the law of Moses is a Law and "written on the stone." Any "breakage from the stone" is the breakage of the covenant. No matter what is the reason, even if it is prophecied, if you claim you are under the law of Moses, when you break a law or when you sin, whether you know it or ignorant of the law, you became liable for breach of the law. The only way of reconciliation with God in accordance to the law given is through animal sacrifices. For law is law "written in stone." I may have a little knowledge about the law of Moses, but I am not stupid to understand the implication of the LAW and what was "written on the stone" means. You better check your own theology for you cannot mislead me with your own reasoning on the law of Moses with regards to the righteousness of God to uplift your own righteousness. At the same time, you cannot even be categorized under the second covenant with regards to Jeremiah 31:31-34 for đąYou have not believe Isaiah 53 as the work of God, as the righteousness of God, thus you have not entered the new covenant that can supersede the old covenant promised by Father; đąyou had not entered the second covenant through Isaiah 53, the Arm of the Lord, Yeshua, when the forgiveness of iniquities had been declared through the suffering, death, and resurrection, ascension of the Arm of the Lord. a. The transfer of our transgressions to the Arm of the Lord and the forgiveness of sins Isaiah 53: 5-6 đBut he was pierced for our transgressions,     he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him,     and by his wounds we are healed.  We all, like sheep, have gone astray,     each of us has turned to our own way; and the Lord has laid on him     the iniquity of us all. P.S. This is also to nullify your claim that the Messiah had sin as you wrongfully proclaimed because "HE offered a sin offering." The Messiah had NO SIN and the sin offering he had done is NOT for himself. This is confirmed in Isaiah 53 đ..and though the LORD makes his life an offering for sin,.. Who makes an offering? This can also be answered by: Isaiah 53:8 đFor he was cut off from the land of the living; Daniel 9:26 đAnd after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but NOT FOR HIMSELF: It will be your problem if you always insist that the work of Isaiah 53 is the work of the created Israel; for Isaiah 53,the new covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 is 100% work of God, that have the power to replace the old covenant as Jeremiah had testified. And the covenant between God and the believers had sealed by the "shedding of BLOOD of the Arm of the Lord" done ONCE and had not been repeated every year, to fulfill what was written on the Law of Moses for the forgiveness of sins Deutetonomy 17:11 đFor the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. For the new convenant can only take effect if He fulfilled the old covenant. And this had been fulfilled by the Arm of the Lord, the Messiah Yeshua who had been cut off not for himself as testified by Daniel 9:26 through his suffering and death as Isaiah 53 testified. đDeath of the Arm of the Lord Isaiah 53:8 đFor he was cut off from the land of the living; đResurrection Isaiah 53: 11 đAfter he has suffered,     he will see the light of life and be satisfied. đAscension ( with regards to Daniel 7:13 and Revelation 5:5-13) Isaiah 53:12 đ...and made intercession for the transgressors. đą you had not entered the second covenant through Isaiah 53 for there is still the presence of the priesthood and the law inherent to the priesthood in the new covenant that is different from the law of Moses as confirmed by Verse 31 to 34. But today you had no king, you had no priesthood, you had no law inherent to the priesthood as prophecied and realistically happening today. Even you can confirmed this for yourselves through your own understanding. For the new covenant is under the priesthood of Melchizedek and you had rejected it, as you had rejected the priest oathed by Father in Psalm 110: 4 Psalm 110:4 đThe Lord has sworn And will not relent, âYou are a priest forever According to the order of Melchizedek.â đą So, as confirmed by the Scripture, and as in your understanding of the Scripture, since you have no priesthood, you have no law in operation, you are not even under the law of Moses neither under the new covenant but ONLY UNDER the MERCY OF GOD. You are today ONLY under the MERCY of God through prayers. If God forgives you, you are forgiven, if NOT, then you are not, 2. As it was written, and as what you have said, the next true temple with the physical literal PRESENCE of the Lord will only be seen when David had resurrected in FLESH. David will be king or leader of the people UNDER THE GUIDANCE of the Lord who will be in the midst of the Jerusalem. Zechariah 8:3 đâThus says the Lord: âI will return to Zion, And dwell in the midst of Jerusalem. Jerusalem shall be called the City of Truth, The Mountain of the Lord of hosts, The Holy Mountain. 3. That is why, the next TRUE PHYSICAL TEMPLE where the Lord Messiah will DWELL in the midst of Jerusalem is if ancestor David lived in flesh who had been resurrected in flesh and guided by the Lord. This is prophecied and we both agree with this. You are correct. Ezekiel 34: 24-26 đAnd I, the Lord, will be their God, and My servant David a prince among them; I, the Lord, have spoken.  âI will make a covenant of peace with them, and cause wild beasts to cease from the land; and they will dwell safely in the wilderness and sleep in the woods.   I will make them and the places all around My hill a blessing; and I will cause showers to come down in their season;  there shall be showers of blessing. đąThat is why you must be aware if there will be building of the PHYSICAL temple as what had been announced in the news today. There must be the existence of David first resurrected in flesh before you confirmed if it is the true temple where the Lord dwells in the midst of Jerusalem. NO David in flesh, No Lord God dwells, NO complete and total peace in its real essence. Have this always on mind. đąThat is why you must be aware if there is a physical temple built without the existence of David living in flesh. Who do you think will rule in Israel. That is the anti-Christ or the anti-Lord or the anti-Messiah. There might be peace and prosperity partially but without David living in flesh, it will only be temporary. It is written. I am also using a clear explicit passages. 4. As to answer the later part of your no video post but only audio Isaiah 65:20 đ âNo more shall an infant from there live but a few days, Nor an old man who has not fulfilled his days; For the child shall die one hundred years old, But the sinner being one hundred  years old shall be accursed. Noticed that there is still the presence of death on that time. But your ancestors and Christians hoping for the everlasting where death had perished. Psalm 139:23-24 đSearch me, God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there is any offensive way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting. This is also the endgoal of true Christians having eternal life; together with the Lord, our King, living together with Him. Proverbs 8:35 đFor those who find me find life and receive favor from the Lord. John 10:28-30 đAnd I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.  My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.   I and my Father are ONE. Adam and Eve had been banished from where the tree of life is located. Genesis 3:22-23 đAnd the Lord God said, âThe man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the TREE  OF LIFE and eat, and live forever.â So the Lord God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken. For the end goal and hope of the prophets and all true Christians is everlasting, living where the TREE OF LIFE existed. Revelations 22:1-3 đThen the angel showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb  through the middle of the street of  the city; also, on either side of the river, the TREE OF LIFE with its twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit each month. The leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.  NO LONGER will there be anything accursed, but the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and his  servants will worship him. I hope this clarified that we Christians, loving the God of Israel, are aiming for eternal life, where death did not exist.This is o
1 week ago | 0
With due respect. Just sharing a comment on "Rabbi Tovia Singer destroyed Jew's for Jesus argument on virgin birth." a. Isaiah 7:14' s 'young woman or almah" is referring to a woman in young and marriageable age and also a virgin in comparison seen in Genesis 24 regarding Rebecca. Rebecca had been referred to as an "Almah" testified as a 1. Young woman In Genesis 24, this had been seen primarily in the servant's prayer Genesis 24:14 đNow let it be that the YOUNG WOMAN to whom I say, âPlease let down your pitcher that I may drink,â and she says, âDrink, and I will also give your camels a drinkââlet her be the one You have appointed for Your servant Isaac. And by this I will know that You have shown kindness to my master.â 2. Virgin or Betulah is the same Genesis 24:16 đNow the YOUNG WOMAN was very beautiful to behold, a VIRGIN; NO man had known her. A. Is the prayer of Abraham' s servant be undermine regarding the word and meaning of a young woman? No. Abraham confirmed that an angel will be with the servant in searched of a wife for Isaac; then it means help will be provided and everything that had been said on Genesis 24 is within the APPROVAL and PURPOSE of God, even the words and the description used. B. Is Rebecca had represented in Genesis 24 a young woman or almah? Yes. C. Is Rebecca had represented in the Genesis 24 a virgin or betulah or with intact hymen? Yes. Genesis 24:16 đNow the YOUNG WOMAN was very beautiful to behold, a VIRGIN; no man had known her. D. Is young woman can also be described in a young marriageabe age and a virgin? Yes. Can anyone says no? Even in In Hebrew bible, it is said, "a virgin,×ְ֟ת×Öź×Ö¸Ö× (be¡tu¡lah)1330: a virgin" Since this is in searched of a wife for Isaac, then Rebecca is a young woman, a virgin with no man known her, and in marriageable age. The comparison of the description of a young woman presented in Isaiah 7:14 had been referenced from Genesis 24 regarding Rebecca. And from Isaiah 7:14 and Genesis 24 is the Scriptural reference made by Matthew regarding young woman as a virgin for the prohecied child that will be born was within the APPROVAL and PURPOSE of God. That is why young woman in Isaiah 7:14 had been categorized by the Scripture and by the people of the Jews back then as a woman in a young marriageble age and a virgin in comparison to Genesis 24 referenced by Matthew. On the other hand, can an older woman who is a virgin categorized also as betulah? That is why "almah" is really the perfect word to Mary, mother of Jesus, described in young marriageable age and a virgin, for "almah" is also considered as a young virgin as seen in đTherefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel. Matthews 1: 21 -23 đAnd she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.â So all this was done that it might be fulfilled which   was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying: âBehold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,â which is   translated, âGod with us.â For Isaiah 7:14 is a prophecy for Mary as a YOUNG VIRGIN pregnant woman who will bear a child (Yeshua/Jesus Christ) and shall call his name Immanuel. Why? For the succeeding verses describes the child living in a place called 'NAZARETH.' Isaiah 7:15 -16 đCurds and honey He shall eat, that He may know to refuse the evil and choose the good.  For before the Child shall know  to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land that you dread will be forsaken by both her kings. These verses are NOT primarily about the child's maturity. Foremostly the verses are talking about the PROVISION given to the child by God. These verses are talking about the place NAZARETH where provision had been given to the child Yeshua/Jesus. This is backed up by the succeeding verses đGo to the history of Nazareth. Nazareth before is a very small village overlooked by mountains in all sides. Public termed it as a "peasant village." Though many other towns and cities looked down on this small village and with its people, Nazareth had been provided by God as a self-sustainable village. Nazarene are primarily farmers and tradesmen. Most of them are livestock farmers shepherding sheep, goats, cows, chickens, donkeys, mules or camel. They had a very large access to milk from their livestock from where curdled milk or cheese came from. And from this unnoticed village where Jesus grew abundantly in food, living and protected from harm in a village with few residents but with a land of good pasture blessed by Father in heaven. 1. Significance of honey Isaiah 7:18-19 đAnd it shall come to pass in that day That the Lord will whistle for the fly That is in the farthest part of the rivers of Egypt, And for the BEE that is in the land of Assyria. They will come, and all of them will rest In the DESOLATE valleys and in the clefts of the rocks, And on all THORNS and in all PASTURES. 2. Significance of Milk Isaiah 7:21-22 đIt shall be in that day That a man will keep alive a young cow   and two sheep; So it shall be, from the abundance of MILK they give, That he will EAT CURDS; For curds and honey everyone will eat who   is left in the land 3. abundant pasture and "rich" nature Isaiah 7:23 đIt shall happen in that day, That wherever there could be a thousand vines Worth a thousand shekels of silver, It will be for briers and thorns. 4. Significance of Protected place; Serenity Isaiah 7:19 Isaiah 7:25 đAnd to any hill which could be dug with the hoe, You will not go there for fear of briers and thorns; But it will become a range for oxen And a place for sheep to roam For the child that had been protected for God's will and purpose, will God cannot protect those He wanted to, even in times of war? For what God prophecied is the born-Saviour of mankind called "Immanuel, a borned God-" named Yeshua/Jesus Christ. B. Isaiah 9:6 đFor unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His  shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, MIGHTY GOD,  EVERLASTING FATHER, Prince of Peace. A born child had named a MIGHTY GOD, where EVERLASTING FATHER dwells. C. You will reason out that Jesus did not fulfill "And the government will be upon His  shoulder, " and also Isaiah 11. Isaiah 11 is an era of total peace. It is NOT YET done by Yeshua/Jesus Christ but He will accomplish it SOON. Do you know why? Isaiah 11 coincides with Ezekiel 37. And in Ezekiel 37, David lived again in flesh. That is why the Lord you are waiting for is also in the era of "dry bone lives," who fills them with flesh. But how can David resurrect again if the Psalm 16:10 have not yet happened? Psalm 16:10 đFor You will not leave my soul in Sheol, Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption. How can David lived again ( For You will not leave my soul in Sheol)   if the Holy One have not resurrected without decay first ( Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption.) ? That is why the resurrection of the Messiah after HE had been cut off prophecied in Daniel 9:26 must happened first before David lived, and before your visioned Messiah will come, for it is the resurrected HOLY One or Messiah is the one who will resurrect David and make him a king in Ezekiel 37. If we are going to analyzed the comparison done 1. David cannot resurrect himself. It is only in the mercy of God resurrection could happen. 2. David' s body is decayed but his soul lives until his dry bones in Ezekiel 37 had filled with FLESH again. That is why you cannot relate David to be the one who had not been decayed, for David decayed already and only lives again in FLESH in the time of "Dry bone lives"; and dry bone means a decayed body or flesh. 3. But the Messiah or Holy One prophecied to die by David in Psalm 16:10 and Daniel in Daniel 9:26 will not undergo body' s corruption or decay. It is only the Arm of the Lord in Isaiah 53 who died but lived again without being decayed. For when the Messiah reigns in Isaiah 11 and Ezekiel 37, the prophecy of being cut off in Daniel 9:26 and resurrected in Psalm 16:10 will not happen anymore. For the death and resurrection of the Arm of the Lord already happened in Yeshua/Jesus Christ. We are all just waiting for a resurrected Messiah in the
2 weeks ago | 0
With due respect. Continuation on a comment on "Rabbi Tovia Singer destroyed Jew's for Jesus argument on virgin birth." You have a wrong interpretation of almah in Proverbs 30: 19 and 20. 1. Verse 19 is explicitly different in verse 20.Verse 19 is talking about a "young virgin" in hebrew called "almah." While verse 20 is talking about an adulterous (woman) called mÉ¡nÄ¡âÄ¡pĚeᚯ. You combined the complete opposite thoughts and interpretation. Using common sense, how can you combine a virgin to an adulterous? You will never align your mind if you combined them. 2. Verse 18 and 19 have the same thoughts, but completely different from Verse 20 Proverbs 30:18-19 đ18There are three things which are too wonderful for me, Yes, four which I do not understand: đ19 The way of an eagle in the air, The way of a serpent on a rock, The way of a ship in the [d]midst of the sea, And the way of a man with a virgin. The verse said 3 things are wonderful for him 1.The way of an eagle in the air 2. The way of a serpent on a rock 3. The way of a ship in the midst of the sea While the way of a man with a virgin is described by the author HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND. For It suggest care and love of a man to a virgin woman.Verse 18 and 19 had a POSITIVE ATTITUDE and coinciding with each other. On verse 20, is explicitly DIFFERENT from verse 18-19 for the author described an adulterous woman which he COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND AND KNOWN by IDENTIFYING HER WAY and "QUOTING HER WORDS" Proverbs 30:20 đThis is the way of an adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth, And says, âI have done no wickedness.â That is why Almah ( young woman) remains "PURE" and must be separated from your thoughts; for you combined them both that must not be done. Mind your intensi
2 weeks ago | 0
With due respect. I cannot reply to @zaharabardavid in the post  "×˘× ×׊ר×× ×××ע××× ×× ×Ś××. ×ר׌×× ××××ת ×Š× ××¨× ××××× ×Ą×× ×ר ×׊ע××× ××-×× Rabbi Tovia Singer". Kindly share Who is the Servant?Part 1/2 Servant and the name Israel is applicable to (1)people of Israel and (2) the Messiah, the Arm of the Lord in Isaiah 53. A. They BOTH came from the womb. The difference is the Arm of the Lord is sent to be born from the womb to be the 'Son of Man,' ( The Seed of the woman) but is God, who will prophecied to destroy the devil. B. They can BOTH be termed " Israel" but they CANNOT be both be termed "Messiah". Isaiah 44: 1-5 đâYet hear now, O Jacob My servant, And Israel whom I have chosen.  Thus says the Lord who made you And formed you from the womb, who will help you: âFear not, O Jacob My servant; And you, Jeshurun, whom I have chosen.    For I will pour water on him who is thirsty, And floods on the DRY GROUND; I will pour My Spirit on your descendants, And My blessing on your offspring;   They will spring up among the grass Like willows by the watercourses.â   One will say, âI am the Lordâsâ; Another will call himself by the name of Jacob; Another will write with his hand, âThe   Lordâs,â And name himself by the name of Israel. In verse 5 says that ANYONE ( marked by one, another, Iam, himself) from the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob can NAME HIMSELF by the name of 'Israel.' So the Arm of the Lord in Isaiah 53 who is God became man, the seed of the woman, from the line of Judah in Micah 5:2 is also capable to name himself by the name of 'Israel.' The DIFFERENCE with the people is: The people NEEDS saving while Messiah is the SAVIOUR for salvation belongs to the Lord. Even before in the beginning,in times of Adam and Eve, they cannot even saved themselves from their sin. And as all man sin, then there is only one outcome for all man- that is death. God is God and He hate sin. Man is man and they cannot save themselves from death for man is only a creation and those who sin needs to be judged for sin is the sting of death . It is only from the MERCY of God that man lives. So do not uplift yourselves against your God for the number one identity you have is ' "transgressors" and only forgiven by God(believers).' Humble yourselves from the righteousness coming from God            (Isaiah 53). All created Israel is disqualified for the works of the Messiah in Isaiah 53 for all man sinned. The Arm of the Lord, the Messiah who had NO SIN testified by 1. Isaiah 53: 9 đthough he had done no violence,nor was any deceit in his mouth.) 2. Daniel 9:26 đAnd after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself 3. Isaiah 53:8 đFor he was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my people he was punished. How about you or the people Israel. Lay down the Scripture that says you had no sin. And I will reason out with you. C. Another difference is the servant Messiah is with the Spirit of God And the Spirit that had been poured out in Isaiah 44:1-5 had been poured out to a ROD from the stem of Jesse. Isaiah 11;1-2 đThere shall come forth a ROD from the STEM(shoot) OF JESSE, And a Branch shall grow out of his roots. The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon Him, The Spirit of wisdom and understanding, The Spirit of counsel and might, The Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord. Isaiah 11 is talking about the LORD, the Rod, who had the Spirit of God. This is NOT about the people Israel who comes out from the womb from the stem of Jesse. This is the Lord sent to be a man prophecied from the descendants of Judah in Micah 5:2. For the people Israel CANNOT "strike the earth with the rod of His mouth neither slay the wicked with the breath of his lips" as Isaiah 11: 4 had said. Can you do that? And also in Isaiah 42:1-4 đâHere is my servant, whom I uphold,    my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him,    and he will bring justice to the nations. He will not shout or cry out,    or raise his voice in the streets. A bruised reed he will not break, and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out. In faithfulness he will bring forth justice;  he will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on earth.    In his TEACHING the islands will put their hope.â This verses is talking about Isaiah 53. Isaiah 53: 1-2 đWho has believed our message    and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed? He grew up before him like a TENDER SHOOT,    and like a ROOT OUT OF DRY GROUND. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him,    nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. "In his teaching the islands will put their hope.â Hope will come from the teaching and not from any military action. Peace will come from teaching and not from aggression. The gospel of Christ is the gospel of Peace. This is Isaiah 53. There is a significance and relation of TEACHING to the former and latter rain prophecied in the Scripture. Zechariah 10:1 đAsk the Lord for rain In the time of the latter rain. The Lord will make flashing clouds;   He will give them showers of RAIN, Grass in the field for everyone. What is the rain? The literal meaning of rain is the pouring out of water from above that can give nourishment for everyone like showers that watered the earth. There are many literal raining season coming to us every year and it all watered down the earth, but there is the specificity of the Scripture in highlighting the former and the latter rain and pointing out the significance of this in our life Joel 2:23 đâBe glad, O children of Zion, and rejoice in the Lord your God, for he has given the early RAIN for your VINDICATION; he has poured down for you abundant rain, the early and the latter rain, as before. What is vindication? Vindication is clearing out from any accusations or blame or suspicions; as being justified. So the literal rain cannot cause vindication that is why the former rain and the latter rain has much more deeper and spiritual meaning than pouring down water from above. This is further explain in..
1 week ago | 0
Torah Class
đš Hope, Restoration, and Messiahâs Return!
In Tom Bradfordâs deep dive into Zechariah, we uncover prophetic visions that bridge the past and present, revealing God's sovereign plan and Messianic promises unfolding before our eyes. Are we truly prepared for whatâs coming?
đĽ Key Themes:
âď¸ God's covenant, divine justice & restoration
âď¸ The Priest-King Messiah & the coming Kingdom
âď¸ Prophecy & Visions in Zechariah & its connection to today
đĄ TOP QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER:
1. How do Zechariahâs prophecies relate to current events?
2. What are some insights regarding leadership and accountability?
3. How does Zechariah describe the Messiahâs return?
đĽ WATCH NOW & DISCOVER:
đš " Zechariahâs Prophecy Is Unfolding!" -3/4/25
đš " Are We Ignoring God?" -3/6/25
đš " A Prophecy You Canât Ignore " -3/8/25
âł Time is shortâprophecy is being fulfilled! Dive in now and strengthen your faith. đ #BibleProphecy #Zechariah #TorahClass
1 month ago | [YT] | 140