Can freedom fighters, libertarians, Americans, & anyone else, divided on asserting ownership of public property, get on the same page? The state or govt even democratic price controls, asserts public ownership, does it not? I reason against that, but look at these similiar cases with me: Amazon may arguably be an Agent of the State at this point, & I would argue funded by public in one regard & funded by force ie an unfair player criminally disaffecting others in the market in another. (1st, To the extent funds obtained from activities (from criminal thieving to govt taxing to fed reserve printing ) other than the free market, that funding is defined as force, it's effect on the market, on people, is force; meaning, such censorship, propaganda, boycotts, advertisers, donors, etc. are forcing their own "will" on others, i.e., criminally taking both free choice & "freewill". (Great lesson in capitalism) youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB0A97C06867AF0D6 2nd, "Agent of the State", legal term, refers to those supposed private entities who are supported by the govt (force) in carrying out said "State's" agenda ie govt run YouTube publishers tailoring their govt approved messages, censoring their comment sections, what's the difference between them & the establishment media, misleading & selling us out for their govt pay.) Looking further, take this proposed public or govt or state building on the other hand, audited by "we the people" in the video below. They say they're a privately run utility but sounds like they've been given monopoly powers by govt or it's supporters, so public as I see it & they've been given privileged status as I see it-not having to pay property tax like everyone else. Of course, it doesn't take much force generated funding to give dominant staus to others making it extremely unfair to any others operating in a free market status. After that, consider these public or govt or state servants if you will, are forcing out a man with a camera now likely because of the ground/public/territory taken/encroached upon by servants during the covid agenda, & they do it mainly as I see it because they don't want to be held accountable for treating the public like we're the servants. This has always been an important question but it becomes imperative as these totalitarian methods are being applied, denying/depriving public of so much with digital id's, social credit scores, & much more on the way. Finally, seems like govt/state/public ownership is going to grow going forward whether we like it or not, & it is good & right for us to uncover/report on, own such spaces that they may not be used, fortresses fit to rule us from. What say you, will you stand for this idea, fight even die, as a libertarian for this idea of public ownership, defending ourselves in other words from the force market. It's one thing to demand by pain of death, your right to leave your house into public perhaps but another to do the same for 1st, a merely not taxed building &/or 2nd, one given monopoly powers ie contracted by the govt or even democratically by its supporters. (America 1st Amm Activism, Liberty Troll, 45 min) https://youtu.be/Y0ZBlMqclHI?si=GR8VPncSUXYfPV31
6 months ago | 1
51-49 with James Li
Happy 4th of July! 🇺🇸🦅🎆
And don't forget: “Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.”
2 years ago | [YT] | 27