I believe in Jesus Christ being the only way any of us are saved. We are all no good with out him.
3 months ago | 16
I reject the term replacement theology because it falsely suggests that God abandoned "Israel" and handed everything over to the Church as a kind of plan B. That’s not what Scripture teaches. The truth is far deeper: God has always defined His people by faith, not bloodline - the Church is Israel. From the beginning, the promise was given to Abraham because of his faith, not his ethnicity. Paul clearly explains this in Galatians 3:7: “Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham.” The real heirs of God’s promises are those who believe in Jesus Christ, whether Jew or Gentile. Jesus Himself confronted the Jewish leaders on this. In Matthew 3:9, He said, “Do not say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham.” In other words, don’t trust in your lineage. Being born of Abraham means nothing without faith. Jesus was crystal clear: blood ties to Abraham do not guarantee inclusion in God’s kingdom. The same truth is repeated in Romans 9:6: “For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” Paul explains that not all physical descendants are spiritual heirs. And in Galatians 4:28-31, he draws a clear line: believers are the children of the free woman (Sarah), while those under the law are children of the bondwoman (Hagar)—and the bondwoman and her son are cast out, meaning unbelieving Israel will not inherit the promise. Jesus also said in Matthew 21:43, “The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing its fruit.” That’s not “replacement”; that’s judgement on unbelief and fulfilment of God’s original promise—that through faith, not nationality, a people would be raised up to inherit the Kingdom. So, I don’t believe that the Church replaces Israel. I believe that the Church is the true Israel—the spiritual descendants of Abraham, those who are in Christ. This isn’t a rejection of God’s covenant—it’s the fulfilment of it. Jesus is the promised Seed (Galatians 3:16), and if you are in Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise (Galatians 3:29). Modern Israel, without faith in Christ, has no covenant standing. The physical lineage means nothing in God’s eyes without the faith of Abraham. That’s not me replacing anything—that’s just what Scripture teaches. To conclude: the gospel doesn’t revolve around race, politics, or borders. It revolves around Christ alone. And only those who believe in Him are included in God’s eternal covenant. That’s not replacement theology—that’s faith alone theology.
3 months ago | 41
We cannot go against God plans in His heart for His land or His people.
3 months ago | 1
The question should be, Do you believe in dispensationalism. Christ is the vine we are added to the vine. No Jew no gentile no slave no free we are all one in Christ Jesus. We don't replace we are added!
3 months ago (edited) | 4
Romans 11:25-26 blows out Replacement Theology. God still has purposes for flesh and blood Israelites after the times of the Gentiles which we are now in.
3 months ago | 4
I don’t agree with the label “replacement” but yes, I am not a dispensationalist. My eschatology is very similar to what the majority of the church has believed since very early on in church history.
3 months ago | 12
Not all who are Israel are Israel… by faith we are all children of Abraham. Dispensationalism is a pretty new idea relative to church history
3 months ago | 17
THOUGH THE BEGINNING OF THE CHURCH WAS JEWISH, ISRAEL HAD THE CHURCH ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. THE CHURCH DOESN'T REPLACE ISRAEL.
3 months ago | 4
It was never about genealogy it was always about faith alone in Christ alone, Israel denies that Jesus is the Christ so therefore not saved. 🙏✝
3 months ago | 18
The Israel of God is the church and to call those who are not in Christ Israel is replacement theology because all of the promises of God are "in Christ" .. The New covenant is with the body of Christ not with gentiles which means heathen😊 The devil stole God's children's identity
3 months ago | 6
A better term than replacement theology would be more like grafted in, meaning anyone who puts their faith in Christ crucifixion, death and resurrection for the remission of their sins has been grafted into God's family, regardless of ethnicity (Jew or Gentile). So yes, replacement theology is Biblical if that is what you mean. The saved, born-again Christian have replaced the ethnic Jew in the New Covenant.
3 months ago (edited) | 20
Voted yes, but "replacement theology" is a poor term for it--"fulfillment theology" would be better, and "covenant theology" better yet. There is one people of God, and the qualification for being among God's people has been the same throughout history from Adam: we're saved by grace through faith in Christ--the Christ to come before the cross, and the Christ who came afterward.
3 months ago | 26
Revealing Truth
Do you believe in Replacement Theology?
3 months ago | [YT] | 108