A QUESTION WAS ASKED ABOUT THE AGE OF THE ALLEGED CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT AT THE PRESENT DATE (MAY 9, 2002) AND THE JUDGE INTERVENED BY SAYING KNOWING THE AGE AT THIS TIME COULD HELP THE DEFENSE IN DETERMINING WHO THE ALLEGED VICTIM COULD BE. THE DEFENSE COULDN'T DETERMINE WHO THE ALLEGED VICTIM WAS BECAUSE OF A PRESENT AGE THIS SHOWS BIASNESS FROM THE COURT BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT SAID THERE WAS 16 TO 18 ALLEGED VICTIMS THIS IS 101 PREJUDICE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT.
PLEASE READ PAGES 70/71
DR. MALACHI YORK SAID HE COULD NOT RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL IN THE CONFEDERATE COURT SYSTEM IN GEORGIA. THIS COURT IS NOT TRYING TO FOUND THE FACTS, THE PROSECUTION DIDN'T MAKE OBJECTION SO WHY DID JUDGE CLAUDE HICKS JR. PLAY THE ROLE OF THE PROSECUTOR ? THE COURT ALREADY KNEW THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DIDN'T HAVE JURISDICTION AND THAT THE STAUTE OF LIMITATIONS WAS AT IT'S LIMIT FOR THE ILLEGAL CASE TO BE IN A FEDERAL COURTROOM.
NuwaubianFacts
A QUESTION WAS ASKED ABOUT THE AGE OF THE ALLEGED CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT AT THE PRESENT DATE (MAY 9, 2002) AND THE JUDGE INTERVENED BY SAYING KNOWING THE AGE AT THIS TIME COULD HELP THE DEFENSE IN DETERMINING WHO THE ALLEGED VICTIM COULD BE.
THE DEFENSE COULDN'T DETERMINE WHO THE ALLEGED VICTIM WAS BECAUSE OF A PRESENT AGE THIS SHOWS BIASNESS FROM THE COURT BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT SAID THERE WAS 16 TO 18 ALLEGED VICTIMS THIS IS 101 PREJUDICE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT.
PLEASE READ PAGES 70/71
DR. MALACHI YORK SAID HE COULD NOT RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL IN THE CONFEDERATE COURT SYSTEM IN GEORGIA. THIS COURT IS NOT TRYING TO FOUND THE FACTS, THE PROSECUTION DIDN'T MAKE OBJECTION SO WHY DID JUDGE CLAUDE HICKS JR. PLAY THE ROLE OF THE PROSECUTOR ?
THE COURT ALREADY KNEW THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DIDN'T HAVE JURISDICTION AND THAT THE STAUTE OF LIMITATIONS WAS AT IT'S LIMIT FOR THE ILLEGAL CASE TO BE IN A FEDERAL COURTROOM.
2 years ago (edited) | [YT] | 4