I’m a fed fan. But you gotta admit Nadal had the best forehand. Ruthless top sin and power. He always had everyone running with a heavy inside forehand before then opening up the court with a ripping forehand outside. Almost indefendable.
2 weeks ago | 10
Clay it’s Nadal hands down, no question. Pretty much every where else, it’s federer. Maybe Nadal comes close on a slow high bouncing HC like IW. Overall, fed>nadal>carlitos>sinner Which the results show so it’s fair.
2 weeks ago | 0
Come on, how’s this even a question? It’s obviously Federer. Especially Federer 2004-2007. The only player who can even make a claim on Federer’s level is Del Potro.
2 weeks ago | 2
Claycourt = Nadal Hardcourt = Federer Grasscourt = Federer Without his huge forehand, Federer would have even struggle to surpass Sampras in GS Totals. Same with Pete and his serve. He would have never reached 14 with a serve like Rafas. Combine Rogers backhand from the Mid 00s + the Late 10s with his forehand and that guy wins easily 25-30 Slams. Without his strong forehand, Nadal still wins his FO Titles alone + some of the USOs. The reason behind it is very simple: He's right handed outside the court, no weakness in his backhand compared to RF in the stages after his Prime (Peak).
2 weeks ago | 0
Without a shade of doubt it was Nadal 🎉🎉 Thunder forehand Del Potro comes next and Novak comes third 🎉 Nadal's forehand had speed, precision, huge top spin, vicious angles and above all reliability. Del Potro intimidated his opponents with flat hitting and ruthless power 🎉 And Novak's forehand is very much underrated. The forehand cross court winner he hit against Alcaraz at break point in the Olympics final says it all and this at 37 years of age with one leg
2 weeks ago (edited) | 0
Very very easy - Roger forehand for sure ... Roger volleys , roger serve , roger smatch , roger slice ..... All this Roger shots is better than Sinner & Alcaraz
2 weeks ago | 0
Nadal all the time. People just mess the "most powerfull/winner material" with the most effective shot. Federer's forehand was super powerfull and insane in ofense, but Nadal's was just way more safe, versatile, and overall a way better shot
2 weeks ago | 3
if backhand is next, Wawrinka better be on the list :)..and yeah, Federer ftw here
2 weeks ago | 0
Just the thumbnail is enough to make you feel what it was like…federer…thank you.
2 weeks ago | 1
The Art of Tennis
Choose the best forehand
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 66