J.D. - A Lawyer Explains

Looks like I missed my guess on how long the jury would take. I thought they would have been done by now.

1 week ago | [YT] | 108



@POVwithRC

My expectation is that they are reviewing the whole interview, as Lori suggested they should

1 week ago | 2

@Vanisle-cat

If the jury does find her not guilty, I wonder how they will react when they inevitably hear about what she's been found guilty of in the other trial. I know a big part of the reason I think she's guilty is because of that other trial. And knowing that made me realize why the evidence of previous crimes is usually excluded from a trial.

1 week ago | 5

@ladyace5446

They should have been done by now. This is absurd

1 week ago | 2

@jackiearneson8352

JD. Could u please explain more about what the aggravating factors mean ? Does stipulating to them mean you are admitting guilt? Seems to me murder is aggravating and horrible enough and to assign a “degree” to it lessens the severity of it. The results are the same in that the person is no longer with us. Thank you. Love your show and your easy to understand explanations.

1 week ago | 0

@karicleveland7888

Agree 💯!!

1 week ago | 1

@wendelynyoung8609

Jury back with verdict

1 week ago | 0