Invidious

Just a thought i had..
When Two needed a 42nd contestant they added Non-existy, but since they count as 0, they had to add someone else, and added price tag.
The thing is, they never really kicked Non-existy, they added Non-existy and it wasn't enough so they added Price tag too, which means Non-existy is in fact a tpot contestant.

Well, i mean im sure the writers of TPOT dont really consider this as the truth, which makes it false, but i think its a funny thought

1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 153

@imfumrsaqjed

Two says "guess we'll have to go with the third placer INSTEAD" so he got fully replaced

1 week ago | 6

@RFAVideoEditingProductions

Technically, Nonexisty does actually exist but got erased at some point either from a prize wheel or One. Nonexisty was Peanut Butter or a Peanut Butter jar as in BFDI 12, Firey tastes nonexistant peanut butter. We also have BFDIA 21, Marker vomits near Nonexisty which means Marker has a peanut allergy. Like a wise Satomi in 2019 said:Nonexisty just doesn't show up.

1 week ago (edited) | 11

@SunsetVidsOfficial

If you think about it, Nonexisty competed in every single BFDI season, and since he never got mentioned, he never got eliminated, which means that he technically won every single season, not actually winning all seasons, but technically

1 week ago | 16

View 1 reply

@frofrokacho

I literally had this thought the other day and looked up TPOT 1 to double check. Sadly, as soon as Two sees that 41 + 0 =41, he says “Well, that wouldn't work, so we can't do that. Guess we'll have to go with the third-placer instead!” This seems to pretty concretely state that adding Nonexisty, in Two’s own words, “wouldn’t work,” so they didn’t do that.

1 week ago (edited) | 4