Pandas might honestly be out first. Pandas aren’t built to move around much, and might just fall over and die on their own without any other animal killing it
1 year ago | 132
Truck sized bald eagles are you kidding me? Nothing can beat that. That's like a 50 or 60 foot wingspan lol
1 year ago | 42
The pandas, mostly due to once you scale to that size, getting though the combo of fur and hide would be near imposable.
1 year ago | 6
Eagles talons would rip everything apart and they can just just sit at altitude 1000s of feet in air and then there grip strength would be unimaginable (Eagles win 100 times out of a 100)
1 year ago | 47
If the eagles are sized by weight not dimensions they would be like dragons
1 year ago | 38
I think this depends on how tall the skyscraper is and how big the pick up truck is. Is the sky scraper 10 stories tall or 150 stories tall? Is the pick up trucks the size of a Mazda truck or a big construction?
1 year ago | 7
All but the flamingos would be crushed under their own weight. The bones are the same size relative to the body but weight increases exponentially.
1 year ago | 6
Almost 2000 TRUCK SIZED EAGLES 😂😂 again TRUCK SIZED is crazy to even think about .. it’s between them and 2mil flamingos straight
1 year ago | 20
People underestimate the grip strength truck sized eagles would have
1 year ago (edited) | 14
I think people forget that while the size may be changing, the demeanor of the animal does not.
1 year ago | 0
Not sure if the flamingos have the will but they sure have the numbers. Surely one will be able to sneak off and hide somewhere and outlast the opposition
1 year ago | 1
Assuming squre cube law doesn't apply, it depends on whether or not that's enough flamingos to compensate for the fodderness of flamingos.
1 year ago | 0
Shit I’d never thought I’d be given a question this in depth and tough before. I gotta go with skyscraper sized pandas though flamingos are a close second. I am loving these comments😂
1 year ago (edited) | 0
Realistically speaking, the flamingos would survive. Easily. If any of the other animals were that big, they would immediately die due to their own body heat, not having enough surface area to let off that body heat their mass produces.
1 year ago | 1
why do the large numbers and sized make it so much more difficult this is awesome, I just want to see it
1 year ago | 3
The flamingos and eagles are likely to not be left standing, they'll be flying rather quickly after all. The pandas as well are more likely to be sitting or laying down. Wolves are the most likely to keep standing the longest, though I suppose if they're sleepy and the pandas are playful the former might lay down while the latter mess around, including standing.😎
1 year ago | 0
The flamingos, no question. Because if those other animals were those sizes, they’d all be immobilized by their size and die of overheating and heart problems amongst other medical issues. Animals anatomy are adapted and specialized for their sizes, and if you make them bigger without tweaking the shape and density of the bones, the cardiovascular system, proportions, internal body temperature even, you end up with a broken medical disaster too weak to move and sometimes unsupported by gravity.
1 year ago | 0
Never Happened
Who would be the last one standing?
1 year ago | [YT] | 255