I don't think having the games is a problem, I think the current status quo of every game, paid or not having a battle pass and also a cosmetic shop is the problem.
1 year ago
| 1
that's the issue of the live service model, even if done well people really have time for one or two games if they want to fully experience them Pretty sure the companies are just banking on people buying the season pass without being able to finish it
1 year ago
| 0
Theoretically having a battle in only one game you want to play isn’t a problem, but obviously that’s not how it goes. I think realistically you can have 1 game that you feel like you have to get in and play around every day without it becoming a chore, but stack that obligation to 3+ games, and it quickly becomes a nightmare. It’s such an anti-consumer way of doing things. I like paying for the games I think are fun, but they never give me a good option to. It’s always a little pass/service, or they beat me down and force me to spend money to power up, and at that point my good will evaporates into desperation. Lame stuff all around.
1 year ago (edited)
| 0
I don't buy anything. Unless I know 100% I'm locked in for that BP or season. I just enjoy the game as is and if it can't keep me, wast. Worth the money. My problem is too many games I want to play period. Haha.
1 year ago | 0
None of those games are on Xbox except TFD but there’s no PvP so I’m passing on it.
1 year ago
| 0
2SK3TCHY
Having too many free-to-play games in your current lineup is a problem?
I want to keep playing Zenless, but also want to keep plaing First Descendant, even Battle Crush, but also looking forward to Speed Freeks coming sometime soon. Playing them isn't the issues, having a battle pass in all of them is. You need to dedicate a lot of time towards each of them to grind for the thing you paid for or else you loss your chance to earn them. This is stupid.
1 year ago | [YT] | 7