Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
Hello and welcome to the Dialectical Girl YouTube Channel - your go-to space where law becomes simple, structured, and relatable!
I’m Divya Hariharan, a Gold Medalist (LL.B) from the University of Lucknow, Bronze Medalist (LL.M) from KMCLU, UGC-NET qualified Assistant Professor, passionate about making legal education accessible for everyone.
On this channel, you'll find:
📚 Clear, concept-based legal lessons
📝 Exam strategies for law students & aspirants
🎯 Insights for UGC-NET, Judiciary & other competitive exams
Whether you're a beginner, an advanced learner, or just exploring the world of law - there’s something valuable here for you.
And it’s not just about books and bare acts - I also share glimpses of my life, so you get to know the person behind the content!
Hit that Subscribe button and be a part of the Dialectical Girl community - where we learn, grow, and build a stronger understanding of the law together.
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
Keep Going ✨✌🏻
3 days ago | [YT] | 15
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
✨☺️
4 days ago | [YT] | 19
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
✨✌🏻
5 days ago | [YT] | 11
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
LAWgically NET – Aaj Ka Case Law #29 – Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897)
Facts: Aron Salomon incorporated a company in which he and his family members were shareholders. When the company went into liquidation, creditors argued that the company was merely Salomon’s alter ego and that he should be personally liable for its debts.
Principle: The House of Lords held that a company has a separate legal personality, distinct from its shareholders. Once legally incorporated, the company is an independent legal entity, even if one person holds controlling interest.
Why Important: This case laid the foundation of modern Company Law. NET frequently asks about separate legal entity, corporate veil, and the distinction between a company and its members.
Comment: Should courts more frequently lift the corporate veil to prevent misuse of companies?
Save this for revision. ✨
#LAWgicallyNET #UGCNETLaw #SalomonCase #SeparateLegalEntity #CompanyLaw #CorporateVeil #UGCNET2025 #CaseLawSeries
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 8
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
What does the legal maxim “jus cogens” mean?
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 8
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
LAWgically NET – Aaj Ka Case Law #28 – M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997)
Facts: A private company linked to Minister Kamal Nath was allowed to divert the flow of the Beas River to protect a luxury motel, causing environmental damage. This misuse of natural resources was challenged through a PIL.
Principle: The Supreme Court applied the Public Trust Doctrine, holding that the State is a trustee of natural resources and cannot transfer them for private commercial use in a manner harmful to the environment.
Why Important: A landmark judgment establishing the Public Trust Doctrine in Indian environmental jurisprudence. NET frequently tests this case in relation to state responsibility, natural resources, and environmental protection.
Comment: Should the State ever be permitted to commercially exploit natural resources held in public trust?
Save this for revision. ✨
#LAWgicallyNET #UGCNETLaw #MCMehta #PublicTrustDoctrine #EnvironmentalProtection #NaturalResources #UGCNET2025 #CaseLawSeries #SupremeCourtJudgment
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 7
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
What does the legal maxim “opinio juris sive necessitatis” mean?
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 9
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
LAWgically NET – Aaj Ka Case Law #27 – M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Taj Trapezium Case) (1997)
Facts: Industrial pollution from factories and refineries around the Taj Mahal was causing discoloration and damage to the monument. A PIL was filed seeking protection of the Taj from environmental degradation.
Principle: The Supreme Court applied the Precautionary Principle and Polluter Pays Principle, ordering closure or relocation of polluting industries and directing the use of cleaner fuels to protect the Taj Mahal.
Why Important: A landmark case linking environmental protection with cultural heritage. NET frequently asks about precautionary principle, polluter pays principle, and judicial intervention in environmental conservation.
Comment: Should industrial development be restricted to protect heritage monuments?
Save this for revision. ✨
#LAWgicallyNET #UGCNETLaw #MCMehta #TajTrapezium #EnvironmentalLaw #PolluterPays #PrecautionaryPrinciple #UGCNET2025 #CaseLawSeries #SupremeCourtJudgment
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 9
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
What does the legal maxim “pacta tertiis nec nocent nec prosunt” mean?
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 9
View 0 replies
Dialectical Girl - Divya Hariharan
Which Article of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties states: “Other subjects of international law, such as international organizations, can also conclude treaties”?
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 8
View 0 replies
Load more