efilism

We are a refined people https://youtu.be/SAkSGtBAvSA?t=968 .

6 hours ago | [YT] | 1

efilism

Every person in this image is to ethics what prostitution is to love.

5 days ago | [YT] | 10

efilism

Regarding Gary's CSAM statements, ‪@veganequilibrium7866‬ says that in private correspondence, Amanda confirmed she "does not agree with Gary's statement and I don't know why she doesn't want me to share she doesn't agree with Gary's statement, but she told me that she doesn't". https://youtu.be/u8NIpDZqAFs?t=17490

The answer to Noodles' question is simple. I explain it here https://youtu.be/E8jvlkvMZhI?t=209

Amanda can't afford to go on public record as disagreeing with Gary's CSAM advocacy because that would require her to
1 admit she lied when she said Gary isn't a CSAM advocate;
2 concede the clips I presented were in fact not taken out of context and accurately represent Gary's statements;
3 apologize to ‪@TheFriendlyAntinatalist‬ and others for trying to pathologize strident opposition to CSAM as mental illness requiring treatment.
4 clarify why she decided to come clean.

In short Amanda can't change her public position without irreparably destroying the fraudulent credibility she's contrived over the years. It would utterly ruin the momentum she's trying to build in academic circles.

Imagine putting yourself in a position so fubared that taking a public stance against CSAM advocacy would ruin your credibility.

How much more whacknutcrazy can it get than being someone who publicly promotes and defends CSAM advocacy from someone she knows is a child predator, and who attacks the character and mental state of people who oppose it, while privately pretending to disavow it all? How does that work? And what does it say about those who promote, support, endorse and collaborate with her?

I bet she's also said similar things to Lawrence, Matti, Tejas, etc in private, which they believe puts them in the clear. But those private statements mean nothing unless they're made in public, especially because they're diametrically opposed to her standing public statements and the fact the material in question is publicly accessible on her channel. The unfortunate reality for them is her public statements make them look like cucked bellends who are happy and willing to carry water for and shield propdf advocates from criticism. Which makes it reasonable to be suspicious about where they stand on such issues. Furthermore, they're likewise in the position where if they now decide to change their public positions, they're going to have to explain why they chose to support and protect her in the first place.

None of these people have any standing or credibility when it comes to ethics, or anything for that matter. Whatever intractable disagreements people might otherwise have, there's always common ground regarding CSA related issues. It isn't something people agree to disagree on just to get along and it certainly isn't something you ignore to leverage for clout. The moment you try to sweep it under the carpet because being publicly opposed to it would be detrimental to you and your cause is the moment you reveal neither you nor your cause are worth shit.

Unless, of course, Noodles is lying.

6 days ago | [YT] | 6

efilism

Looks like Gary Mosher ‪@inmendham‬ is still in the habit of accusing others of being CSAbusers. It's all confession by projection in light of the fact he's on video grooming underage girls → https://youtu.be/4P1px-cJ1EM?t=348

For a full range of clips with detailed analyses → stevegodfrey.substack.com/p/gary-mosher-predator

There's also this recent clip x.com/ThisIsEfilism/status/2005657467913674996 of him creeping over a 13 year old girl. YouTube deleted Gary's video for violating the policy on nudity or sexual content.

And to think, there are people who defend Gary's propedotendencies...
- Amanda Sukenick https://youtu.be/HCFsPoOdfAI (Amanda defends Gary by saying he doesn't advocate for CSAM, which is of course a brazen baldfaced lie. She also pathologizes strident opposition to CSAM advocacy as mental illness in need of treatment.)
- Tejas Gokhale https://youtu.be/5Y49kjVzew4 (Tejas tries to draw some kind of equivalency between using CSAM and using buildings built by slaves, although as you can see from my question in the comments, he never actually clarifies what his point is. He also complains about opposition to CSAM advocacy having a detrimental impact on the antinatalism movement.)
- Danny Shine x.com/ThisIsEfilism/status/1995406025491648909 (Danny believes Gary has propedo tendencies just because he's a flawed human being like the rest of us, and he's more concerned about my motivations for pursuing this.)

These are people seeking status and recognition as anti-suffering ethics activists ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

h/t ‪@BlueMoonshine‬ ​

1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 9

efilism

Efilists are blockheads x.com/ThisIsEfilism/status/2003824667451334718 .

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 9

efilism

Just as I suspected. Danny Shine confirms his book is AI slop and that he doesn't read https://youtu.be/szBHrotQk6Y?t=3359

An AI "authored" book prompted by a non-reader who believes his book breaks new ground nobody else has ever written about.

What a wanker.

Uh, I mean scholar. What a scholar.

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 9

efilism

When Gary was 50 he hit on two underage girls, acting in a manner impossible to distinguish from a child grooming sex predator stevegodfrey.substack.com/p/gary-mosher-predator

Now at the age of 66 he still can't help himself: "So this girl looks 13, 14, I don't know. Okay. So this will end up causing some kind of argument, right? Because it's a lovely face, right? She has a lovely face, you know, and the hair is great. Now, she might be 30 years old. Who knows, right? Sometimes you just can't tell with some people. Um, but just looking at the icon and you're just saying, "Ohh"." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZBhO...

"Anyway, look at that lovely hair. Lovely, lovely, lovely. All right. Probably can't say that though." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZBhO...

He tries to backtrack by saying she might be 30, but that doesn't change the fact he believes she's 13 or 14. And that "Ohh" has the cadence of a typical male reaction to seeing someone sexually desirable.

Given his track record, seeing him fawn over a girl he believes to be 13 makes it clear this is who he is through and through. Notice how he attempts to minimize his behavior by pre-empting the pushback he'll get, reaching for plausible deniability. But this isn't a one off. It's indicative of a pattern of behavior. It's exactly the same approach he used before, complimenting his targets' cute little blond hair.

This is what he does in public. Imagine what he gets up to behind closed doors. Anyone promoting this prick to minors in their audience is complicit in exposing children to the risk of being groomed by a predator.

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 10

efilism

I'm postponing the debate review stream. Was hoping to get the better of the lurgy I've been nursing for a couple of days but my throat is still pretty rough. Will get to it as soon as things clear up. Cheers.

4 weeks ago | [YT] | 7

efilism

From USA Dept of Homeland Security: "In order to comply with the January 2025 Executive Order 14161 (Protecting the United States From Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats), CBP is adding social media as a mandatory data element for an ESTA application. The data element will require ESTA applicants to provide their social media from the last 5 years."
public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-22461.p… p9

Mandatory.

This will apply to citizens from VWP designated countries travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/touris…

I previously warned about this kind of trajectory related to the antinatalism efilism spheres, which was of course met with derision by self-righteous indignant know-nothings archive.md/7MLIS


No idea how this will pan out, but taking into account May 17 and the broader push to the right in America, efilists and antinatalists who are active on social media and who intend to go to America in the future should take this into consideration.

4 weeks ago | [YT] | 4