DEAR SUBSCRIBERS, please take time to downvote this video, and tell everyone you know to downvote it as well. There must be swift consequences for this mendacious, disgusting ZioCon propaganda.
Why do incels and "blackpillers" desperately defend the ridiculous and distinctly modern claim that women have a much lower libido than men? This is hugely cognitively dissonant with their strong conviction that women are also "304s" who ride the "carousel" and seem to think about nothing but Chad's package 24/7 according to them. I have three theories, and I'm interested in knowing which one my audience thinks is most likely.
1. It's a cope strategy to equalize them and the "Chads" they hate so much. If women don't really care that much about sex and orgasms anyway, then failing to please a woman doesn't mean you're being "mogged" that hard by those who succeed.
2. Deep down, these guys still have a bluepill Victorian fantasy that women are these pure angelic mommywives who will live out their 1950s tradcon fantasies. All the screaming online about how "women are all 304s and manipulators" is just a coping mechanism for dealing with the non-concordance between their fantasy and reality.
3. There is no logic whatsover. These losers are reacting emotionally and constructing a narrative where they can feel sorry for themselves and are always the victim. When that necessitates turning all women into horny sloots, all women are horny sloots. When it necessitates turning women into asexual manipulators, then all women are asexual manipulators. Finally, you are dealing with mentally ill angry virgins, not rational, emotionally mature thinkers.
My prediction is that 2026 will be the year that the Left devolves into an internal civil war between its two dominant online factions: the old-guard millennial "atheism is unstoppable, trust the science, get the stab" Reddit techie bugmen and the mostly-female (or "non binary"), Gen Z TikTok crowd who crush on Mamdani, hate Big Pharma, and believe in witchcraft and "holistic spirituality". And I will love every moment of it.
The misandrist lie that women are inherently more empathetic, nurturing, altruistic and sociable than men is responsible for far greater pain and suffering in a man's life than women being "304s" or having high standards for sexual compatibility.
Joyce Benenson's work has completely demolished the myth of some "biological" tendency for men to be deficient in social skills and the misandrist, disgusting "male brain" theory of autism by pointing out how the vast majority of tribal cultures are based on extreme male solidarity in warrior bands, and loyalty, interpersonal skills, hospitality and reciprocity are totally essential to being a "real man" in such societies.
As a result, she doesn't even get a page on Wikipedia while the media have spent the last two decades glazing frauds like Simon Baron-Cohen (whose findings have been totally debunked by none other than Benenson herself), calling him a "heterodox", "brave" and "politically incorrect" scholar when in fact all he does is insult and denigrate men and male friendships. Literally the LEAST brave thing you can possibly do in the modern West.
In my experience, for all the issues a certain loud minority of terminally-online leftist tech-bros have with the terrifying thought of leaving traditional cultures alone, the number one enemy of hunter-gatherers and indigenous people both online and IRL has always been the Evangelical Christian right (especially males for some reason). This is the group that today continues to spout lies that hunter-gatherers are "inherently violent" and that "native peoples were all killing each other before we showed up to save them". They are the origin of d-bags like John Allen Chau (may God give him the eternity he deserves) and the CIA-affiliated "Joshua Project" and "Asia Harvest" organizations and their shady tactics of geopolitical intrigue disguised as "saving souls". And let's not forget, it was this group who was responsible for the development of North America and Australia into the modern societies we know today via the worst genocide campaign in human history.
Today, online "based crusaders" continue to feel the need to attack, silence and suppress pro-indigenous voices due to a desperate, freudian desire to feel like their facade of masculine power and strength does not go challenged by the possibility that maybe they, the based online crusader trad-bro, are actually the bad guys.
Society's dating and relationship dynamics will continue to be utter trash as long as the question keeps being "why don't men approach women anymore?" instead of "why don't women start approaching men?" The Jarawa, Pueblo, Mataco and a huge host of other societies are smarter and better than we are, and that's why they don't have an incel crisis.
The "Traditional Culture Preservation Society" (2020-2025) is no longer operating as a regular YouTube service. The project has failed, and it's time to move on. In the year 2026, the emergent far right has now seized complete control of the internet, especially YouTube, and is actively suppressing and censoring voices that promote indigenous perspectives and opposition to modern technology. Bad faith actors, CIA agitators, incels, and terminally online NEET losers have carte blanche to lie, slander and threaten anyone who goes against the emergent "neo-reactionary" narrative while the latter have no recourse. In effect, a small group of failed men without real life friends, connections or job security have been weaponized by the algorithm to live out their insecure revenge fantasies by bullying and harassing people online whose worldviews make them uncomfortable.
If anyone wishes to continue to have access to my content, including a large number of new videos I am working on, I am in the process of setting up a Patreon (or perhaps an alternative service where I can receive a pittance for my work). I hope this doesn't sound too grifty, so I am planning on making the price very low. I am not interested in the money since I have a full time job with decent pay, but I want to ensure that any knowledge I impart from here on out is given only to those who are going to benefit, those I can trust who have passed through some kind of screening process. I am tired of "casting pearls before swine".
Meanwhile, the J. R. Busk Records music channel will continue as it has.
You gotta love the moments when a random youtube commenter ends up saying what you wanted to say but would get your comment suppressed/censored if you do. Proves that not everyone online is a total worthless bugman.
People who are familiar with the online debate world have probably run across the idea of the "Islamic dilemma" at some point in their lives, usually being pushed by bad-faith Christian Zionists. I decided to create the "Christian Zionist dilemma" to honor them. The Christian Zionist dilemma runs like this:
According to Christian Zionist propaganda, Christians need to stand with Israel because the Juice are still "God's chosen people" or He still has some special relationship with/love for them that separates them from everyone else. The problem is it's notoriously difficult to define exactly what makes someone "Juicy": is it a religion or is it a race/ethnicity?
If Juiciness is mainly about religion, then Christian Zionism is promoting religious pluralism by behaving as though the God of the New Testament, Jesus Christ, who famously stated "no one comes to Father except through Me" (John 14:6) has some favoritism for a religion that rejects Him and blasphemes Him by stating that He is burning in Hell in a pit of flaming diarrhea (Gittin 57a, Babylonian Talmud). This is clearly completely against the entire spirit of the New Testament, makes the entire point of Christianity meaningless and self-refutes on this basis.
If Juiciness is mainly about ethnicity, then "race realism" (i.e. scientific racism) is true, and God is a racist who holds an ethnic group who by and large rejected Him in higher regard than His own followers, a clear contradiction of numerous passages of the New Testament, most notably Galatians 3:28. If one attempts to counter this argument by claiming that Juice aren't superior to everyone else but they still deserve their own ethnostate, this begs the question of whether all ethnocultural groups should have a right to an ethnostate that gets to oppress and unalive anyone they see as a threat to their ingroup interest. Since virtually all Christian Zionists are modernist liberals who worship "democracy" and "Western civilization", of course there's no way in Hell they'll argue in favor of that position.
Basically, there's no way to make Christian Zionism a coherent, logical Christian position, which is why its apologists almost unanimously rely on emotional, liberal and geopolitical arguments rather than theological ones.
J.R. Busk Records
DEAR SUBSCRIBERS, please take time to downvote this video, and tell everyone you know to downvote it as well. There must be swift consequences for this mendacious, disgusting ZioCon propaganda.
2 days ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
Why do incels and "blackpillers" desperately defend the ridiculous and distinctly modern claim that women have a much lower libido than men? This is hugely cognitively dissonant with their strong conviction that women are also "304s" who ride the "carousel" and seem to think about nothing but Chad's package 24/7 according to them. I have three theories, and I'm interested in knowing which one my audience thinks is most likely.
1. It's a cope strategy to equalize them and the "Chads" they hate so much. If women don't really care that much about sex and orgasms anyway, then failing to please a woman doesn't mean you're being "mogged" that hard by those who succeed.
2. Deep down, these guys still have a bluepill Victorian fantasy that women are these pure angelic mommywives who will live out their 1950s tradcon fantasies. All the screaming online about how "women are all 304s and manipulators" is just a coping mechanism for dealing with the non-concordance between their fantasy and reality.
3. There is no logic whatsover. These losers are reacting emotionally and constructing a narrative where they can feel sorry for themselves and are always the victim. When that necessitates turning all women into horny sloots, all women are horny sloots. When it necessitates turning women into asexual manipulators, then all women are asexual manipulators. Finally, you are dealing with mentally ill angry virgins, not rational, emotionally mature thinkers.
3 days ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
My prediction is that 2026 will be the year that the Left devolves into an internal civil war between its two dominant online factions: the old-guard millennial "atheism is unstoppable, trust the science, get the stab" Reddit techie bugmen and the mostly-female (or "non binary"), Gen Z TikTok crowd who crush on Mamdani, hate Big Pharma, and believe in witchcraft and "holistic spirituality". And I will love every moment of it.
4 days ago | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
The misandrist lie that women are inherently more empathetic, nurturing, altruistic and sociable than men is responsible for far greater pain and suffering in a man's life than women being "304s" or having high standards for sexual compatibility.
Joyce Benenson's work has completely demolished the myth of some "biological" tendency for men to be deficient in social skills and the misandrist, disgusting "male brain" theory of autism by pointing out how the vast majority of tribal cultures are based on extreme male solidarity in warrior bands, and loyalty, interpersonal skills, hospitality and reciprocity are totally essential to being a "real man" in such societies.
As a result, she doesn't even get a page on Wikipedia while the media have spent the last two decades glazing frauds like Simon Baron-Cohen (whose findings have been totally debunked by none other than Benenson herself), calling him a "heterodox", "brave" and "politically incorrect" scholar when in fact all he does is insult and denigrate men and male friendships. Literally the LEAST brave thing you can possibly do in the modern West.
5 days ago | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
Incels of the internet: would you be willing to "geomaxx" for a Papua New Guinea woman? If not, then stop whining about women's "high standards".
1 week ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
In my experience, for all the issues a certain loud minority of terminally-online leftist tech-bros have with the terrifying thought of leaving traditional cultures alone, the number one enemy of hunter-gatherers and indigenous people both online and IRL has always been the Evangelical Christian right (especially males for some reason). This is the group that today continues to spout lies that hunter-gatherers are "inherently violent" and that "native peoples were all killing each other before we showed up to save them". They are the origin of d-bags like John Allen Chau (may God give him the eternity he deserves) and the CIA-affiliated "Joshua Project" and "Asia Harvest" organizations and their shady tactics of geopolitical intrigue disguised as "saving souls". And let's not forget, it was this group who was responsible for the development of North America and Australia into the modern societies we know today via the worst genocide campaign in human history.
Today, online "based crusaders" continue to feel the need to attack, silence and suppress pro-indigenous voices due to a desperate, freudian desire to feel like their facade of masculine power and strength does not go challenged by the possibility that maybe they, the based online crusader trad-bro, are actually the bad guys.
1 week ago | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
Society's dating and relationship dynamics will continue to be utter trash as long as the question keeps being "why don't men approach women anymore?" instead of "why don't women start approaching men?" The Jarawa, Pueblo, Mataco and a huge host of other societies are smarter and better than we are, and that's why they don't have an incel crisis.
1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
The "Traditional Culture Preservation Society" (2020-2025) is no longer operating as a regular YouTube service. The project has failed, and it's time to move on. In the year 2026, the emergent far right has now seized complete control of the internet, especially YouTube, and is actively suppressing and censoring voices that promote indigenous perspectives and opposition to modern technology. Bad faith actors, CIA agitators, incels, and terminally online NEET losers have carte blanche to lie, slander and threaten anyone who goes against the emergent "neo-reactionary" narrative while the latter have no recourse. In effect, a small group of failed men without real life friends, connections or job security have been weaponized by the algorithm to live out their insecure revenge fantasies by bullying and harassing people online whose worldviews make them uncomfortable.
If anyone wishes to continue to have access to my content, including a large number of new videos I am working on, I am in the process of setting up a Patreon (or perhaps an alternative service where I can receive a pittance for my work). I hope this doesn't sound too grifty, so I am planning on making the price very low. I am not interested in the money since I have a full time job with decent pay, but I want to ensure that any knowledge I impart from here on out is given only to those who are going to benefit, those I can trust who have passed through some kind of screening process. I am tired of "casting pearls before swine".
Meanwhile, the J. R. Busk Records music channel will continue as it has.
1 week ago | [YT] | 2
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
You gotta love the moments when a random youtube commenter ends up saying what you wanted to say but would get your comment suppressed/censored if you do. Proves that not everyone online is a total worthless bugman.
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies
J.R. Busk Records
People who are familiar with the online debate world have probably run across the idea of the "Islamic dilemma" at some point in their lives, usually being pushed by bad-faith Christian Zionists. I decided to create the "Christian Zionist dilemma" to honor them. The Christian Zionist dilemma runs like this:
According to Christian Zionist propaganda, Christians need to stand with Israel because the Juice are still "God's chosen people" or He still has some special relationship with/love for them that separates them from everyone else. The problem is it's notoriously difficult to define exactly what makes someone "Juicy": is it a religion or is it a race/ethnicity?
If Juiciness is mainly about religion, then Christian Zionism is promoting religious pluralism by behaving as though the God of the New Testament, Jesus Christ, who famously stated "no one comes to Father except through Me" (John 14:6) has some favoritism for a religion that rejects Him and blasphemes Him by stating that He is burning in Hell in a pit of flaming diarrhea (Gittin 57a, Babylonian Talmud). This is clearly completely against the entire spirit of the New Testament, makes the entire point of Christianity meaningless and self-refutes on this basis.
If Juiciness is mainly about ethnicity, then "race realism" (i.e. scientific racism) is true, and God is a racist who holds an ethnic group who by and large rejected Him in higher regard than His own followers, a clear contradiction of numerous passages of the New Testament, most notably Galatians 3:28. If one attempts to counter this argument by claiming that Juice aren't superior to everyone else but they still deserve their own ethnostate, this begs the question of whether all ethnocultural groups should have a right to an ethnostate that gets to oppress and unalive anyone they see as a threat to their ingroup interest. Since virtually all Christian Zionists are modernist liberals who worship "democracy" and "Western civilization", of course there's no way in Hell they'll argue in favor of that position.
Basically, there's no way to make Christian Zionism a coherent, logical Christian position, which is why its apologists almost unanimously rely on emotional, liberal and geopolitical arguments rather than theological ones.
3 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 8
View 1 reply
Load more