Adversus Spiritum Mundi

8 months ago | [YT] | 6

Adversus Spiritum Mundi

This platform removed "evangelization" from the dictionary!?

8 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 3

Adversus Spiritum Mundi

1 year ago | [YT] | 3

Adversus Spiritum Mundi

Foolproof Your Faith:
Listening to a PHD, bishop, priest, or radcon, ask yourselves these questions:
Does this speaker think we are evolving to a better Christianity from a worse one?
Does this speaker think that Christianity used to be worse, but after some council or decree it became better?

If you answer "yes" for either of those then don't listen to them.

1 year ago (edited) | [YT] | 1

Adversus Spiritum Mundi

1 year ago | [YT] | 2

Adversus Spiritum Mundi

We need to be able to realize in the church we can have leaders with deep addictions at the top, even deep addictions that result in scandalizing and causing their children to be lost. This is prophesied clearly by Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich, Akita, 2 Timothy 4:3. A wife who does not hold a moral backbone with respect to a husband who has become a dangerous sinner condemns the children. It is absolutely required to not go with a naturalist father or to partake when a father leaves inappropriate magazines in the toilet. A faithful son will maintain the traditions of his grandfathers even if his father becomes a hippy; the children of docility in the current age are in great danger.

1 year ago (edited) | [YT] | 3

Adversus Spiritum Mundi

ON SALVATION (The Calculus of Atonement)
Throughout history of salvation since Christ, man has been trying to distance personal responsibility from salvation progressively. So the earliest soteriological models abstract responsibility from the individual for salvation and this happens progressively over and over again through history until the responsibility of the individual is entirely removed in the movement from the evangelical substitution of atonement to the most developed model, universalism.

2 years ago | [YT] | 2

Adversus Spiritum Mundi

Karl Rahner is symbolic and a bulwark for much of the culture in The Church and their errors today.

Rahner on the Church's Fear:

"It is a church that often loves the calm more than the storm
The old which has proved itself more than the new which is bold and daring."

The problem with this statement is the last sentence. I agree with the first, but the new is not bold and daring. The new turned out to be safe, universalist, calm, comfortable for the affluent and powerful, and very protestant, universalist and acquiescent to the culture. It's a tragedy really. While he is right, he is so terribly and catastrophically wrong. Where is comfortability and safety in a persecution? Safety is with the broader culture and the world. Safety is with a rejection of history, a rejection of the old which has proved itself in the face of the bloodthirsty revolutionary.

3 years ago (edited) | [YT] | 3