A scary thought when you realize Sayians (Vegeta notably) in Dragon Ball who are far above the law can mingle into human society better than X-men’s mutants.
It makes you think.
[This piece is somewhat unrelated but for intensive purposes: Havok is the Cooler Summers]
I’m going to take up the stage to explain why the prevailing girl-boss fad should fear the shy, timid, and innocent archetype of woman; for the sake of brevity, I’ll refer to all as the “gentle types.”
•These gentle women don’t appear to hold authority over anyone else, but they prefer to keep it that way because they believe apposing one’s power doesn’t kindle good connections with people.
•The Girlbosses seek glory and attention to be seen as more capable than the men around them; the gentle types don’t seek power but rather admiration for their kindness. As for the men around them, she respects them and even falls into romantic interest with a stronger arm, even if the man in question has a background of crime.
•The gentle types are more forgiving, even towards their enemies. They do take action to stop their cruelty and misdeeds, but they still prefer to treat them as people or talk to figure out what other plans they have. Unlike the girlboss who cares not what their opposition thinks or cares about, they can’t have a say nor figure out what plans are in store. Destroy first, ask questions later.
•These gentlewomen can show the girl boss that the world isn’t a cruel or insignificant place through the people they love (Agape, Mania, and/or Ludus); it helps the gentlewoman build herself as a person, teaches her values or information she never had, increases her potential, and greatly encourages her to get back up and keep going.
•The gentle types are responsible with whatever gifts they’re given and use them to help those around them rather than for themselves. The girlboss archetype focuses primarily on herself, but she’s idolized for tackling the opposition head-on.
•Although the gentle types tend to not hold or harness the means of authority. However, they could persuade those of authority or irrational minds to change their approach without degradation because they know opposing their judgments, like the girlbosses, is far more reckless and incompatible to achieve success and civility.
•The Girlbosses would arrogantly believe they’re cowardly for retreating and fleeing the battle or tending to other matters. However, the gentle types hold the greatest advantage of picking and choosing their fights. When forced into a battle, they use that strategy to manipulate the surrounding environment or utilize cunning to gain the advantage rather than brute-forcing the situation.
•The anger of a gentle girl triumphs over the girlbosses’ boast of wrath; the difference is in how the gentle prefer to hold in that aggression despite whatever treatment they could receive. But when push comes to shove, when the ones they care for is threatened, they strike like a bomb and depart like a storm—it’s more concentrated, focused, and less predictable than the girlboss’ headstrong approach of a berserker.
X-Men were always woke. So why is it that mutants and humanity never found any common ground yet? If this is supposedly the ideologies that promise equality and bringing people together in the supposed utopia, why haven’t they gotten along yet and prefer to keep segregating themselves and living in constant oppression?
Could it be that a certain belief is overshadowing genuine unity and kinship? Could it be that certain beliefs write off humanity as inherently unforgiving because of something they weren’t born for yet are being demanded reparations for? Maybe it has to do with certain mutants involved who would rather perpetuate conflict for their self-interests? Perhaps because the writers involved, who have those same interests, project them into the stories as such so they can rewrite rationality, making the opposing group irrational savages for what they believe?
The “right reasons”suuuuurrree, Mr. Nothing is wrong with HBO’s Watchmen.
As if there are many ways to hammer home that she’s conceptually poor with hardly anything going for her other than being a black girl version of Jimmy Neutron they WANT you to take seriously—and then they pass that down to the majority of All New All Different types like Moon Girl, even Miles in the 2017 cartoon. All with their own expansive boons after boon instead of presenting room for growth and curveballs.
There’s this fun comparison I would like to do and further expand upon soon with MC2’s Spider-Girl and Miles Morales: one could’ve been a threat to Mephisto if Peter didn’t make that blasted deal; the other got what he wanted out of the deal because “he wanted to be unpredictable.”
However, all of that wouldn’t matter because these types hate traditional family structures, the oh-so-cruel idea of handling a white man’s title, and the concept of having a villain (who isn’t popular like Thanos) beat characters with genuine skill and cunning. Honestly, what folks really need from the genre nowadays isn’t new “heroes” that hostler a superficial facade; it’s villains who simply have the advantage instead of being presented feeble or subject to manipulation, such as Batman organizing something with the Joker, all to “test Superman,” which he somehow failed…
Legacy
Legacy
With all the news about the changes with the Cracker Barrel brings me back to when they took the Jamaican away from the Cinna-Mohn!
And these are the types of the people that want to be inclusive going “in the right direction.”
Unbelievable
1 week ago | [YT] | 2
View 1 reply
Legacy
A scary thought when you realize Sayians (Vegeta notably) in Dragon Ball who are far above the law can mingle into human society better than X-men’s mutants.
It makes you think.
[This piece is somewhat unrelated but for intensive purposes: Havok is the Cooler Summers]
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Legacy
I’m going to take up the stage to explain why the prevailing girl-boss fad should fear the shy, timid, and innocent archetype of woman; for the sake of brevity, I’ll refer to all as the “gentle types.”
•These gentle women don’t appear to hold authority over anyone else, but they prefer to keep it that way because they believe apposing one’s power doesn’t kindle good connections with people.
•The Girlbosses seek glory and attention to be seen as more capable than the men around them; the gentle types don’t seek power but rather admiration for their kindness. As for the men around them, she respects them and even falls into romantic interest with a stronger arm, even if the man in question has a background of crime.
•The gentle types are more forgiving, even towards their enemies. They do take action to stop their cruelty and misdeeds, but they still prefer to treat them as people or talk to figure out what other plans they have. Unlike the girlboss who cares not what their opposition thinks or cares about, they can’t have a say nor figure out what plans are in store. Destroy first, ask questions later.
•These gentlewomen can show the girl boss that the world isn’t a cruel or insignificant place through the people they love (Agape, Mania, and/or Ludus); it helps the gentlewoman build herself as a person, teaches her values or information she never had, increases her potential, and greatly encourages her to get back up and keep going.
•The gentle types are responsible with whatever gifts they’re given and use them to help those around them rather than for themselves. The girlboss archetype focuses primarily on herself, but she’s idolized for tackling the opposition head-on.
•Although the gentle types tend to not hold or harness the means of authority. However, they could persuade those of authority or irrational minds to change their approach without degradation because they know opposing their judgments, like the girlbosses, is far more reckless and incompatible to achieve success and civility.
•The Girlbosses would arrogantly believe they’re cowardly for retreating and fleeing the battle or tending to other matters. However, the gentle types hold the greatest advantage of picking and choosing their fights. When forced into a battle, they use that strategy to manipulate the surrounding environment or utilize cunning to gain the advantage rather than brute-forcing the situation.
•The anger of a gentle girl triumphs over the girlbosses’ boast of wrath; the difference is in how the gentle prefer to hold in that aggression despite whatever treatment they could receive. But when push comes to shove, when the ones they care for is threatened, they strike like a bomb and depart like a storm—it’s more concentrated, focused, and less predictable than the girlboss’ headstrong approach of a berserker.
1 month ago | [YT] | 5
View 2 replies
Legacy
Computer back to full efficiency.
1 month ago | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies
Legacy
Resizing most of these are a pain.
1 month ago | [YT] | 2
View 2 replies
Legacy
I’ve preoccupying myself with inks and paper that I decided. Hey, why not make some stando powah in the meanwhile.
2 months ago | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies
Legacy
A loving couple, nothing out of the ordinary.
2 months ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Legacy
You know what, I’ll bite.
X-Men were always woke. So why is it that mutants and humanity never found any common ground yet? If this is supposedly the ideologies that promise equality and bringing people together in the supposed utopia, why haven’t they gotten along yet and prefer to keep segregating themselves and living in constant oppression?
Could it be that a certain belief is overshadowing genuine unity and kinship? Could it be that certain beliefs write off humanity as inherently unforgiving because of something they weren’t born for yet are being demanded reparations for? Maybe it has to do with certain mutants involved who would rather perpetuate conflict for their self-interests? Perhaps because the writers involved, who have those same interests, project them into the stories as such so they can rewrite rationality, making the opposing group irrational savages for what they believe?
No, it must be because you’re racist.
2 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 20
View 5 replies
Legacy
The “right reasons”suuuuurrree, Mr. Nothing is wrong with HBO’s Watchmen.
As if there are many ways to hammer home that she’s conceptually poor with hardly anything going for her other than being a black girl version of Jimmy Neutron they WANT you to take seriously—and then they pass that down to the majority of All New All Different types like Moon Girl, even Miles in the 2017 cartoon. All with their own expansive boons after boon instead of presenting room for growth and curveballs.
There’s this fun comparison I would like to do and further expand upon soon with MC2’s Spider-Girl and Miles Morales: one could’ve been a threat to Mephisto if Peter didn’t make that blasted deal; the other got what he wanted out of the deal because “he wanted to be unpredictable.”
However, all of that wouldn’t matter because these types hate traditional family structures, the oh-so-cruel idea of handling a white man’s title, and the concept of having a villain (who isn’t popular like Thanos) beat characters with genuine skill and cunning. Honestly, what folks really need from the genre nowadays isn’t new “heroes” that hostler a superficial facade; it’s villains who simply have the advantage instead of being presented feeble or subject to manipulation, such as Batman organizing something with the Joker, all to “test Superman,” which he somehow failed…
2 months ago | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
Load more