Daniel Speiss

Since You tube is giving creators more optionality to connect with you all I'' be giving this area more of an effort. A lot to come in 2026, would you like to see from me?

4 days ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

If you’ve been feeling off, burnt out, or like you’re not fully yourself —
it’s probably not because you need to “fix” yourself.

It’s because you’re misaligned.

A real reset isn’t about changing who you are.
It’s about realigning what you’re orienting toward.

Most people are operating inside environments that fight their natural wiring every day.
Over time, that creates stress, performance mode, and disconnection.

This is why PRISM starts at the core:
→ Identify your top two cognitive superpowers
→ Use them as your internal compass
→ Run a short calibration on what actually gives you energy
→ Then design your environment around that

Flow isn’t accidental.
It’s what happens when your life finally fits you.

Save this and come back to it.
2026 is about alignment, not force.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

6 days ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

NEW VIDEO: PRISM Relational Fit scores your baseline regulation (supply/demand) provides key insights for compatibility.

3 months ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

New videos out from a recent live stream! A lot of good nuggest

3 months ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

Cruel symmetry. In the wake of the news about Charlie, the loudest voices rushed to say the ugliest things—and yet that very clamor is the strange proof of what he fought for. Freedom of speech isn’t tidy; it’s a wide, unruly table where the noble and the nasty both find a chair. Charlie knew that. He chose it anyway—because liberty without risk is just a slogan, and patriotism without courage is just a costume.

Then a friend spoke to me in a way so polarizing, so detached from reality, that I felt a distance and disappointment I haven’t felt since COVID. Just like that, an old wave returned—swelling with unfounded accusations, attempts at character destruction, and a mirage of moral high ground. And here’s the maddening irony: the very freedom some now use to smear, to posture, to grandstand is the freedom he spent his life defending for them, too. It’s hypocritical, yes—and it’s also the eerie confirmation of his mission. Once again, the unreasonable voices that used to rant on forgotten street corners are handed the limelight, because liberty doesn’t filter for wisdom.

Mourn him if you will, debate him if you must—but recognize the paradox at the heart of a free nation: we protect the right to speak even when the speech is indecent. That’s not a loophole in his legacy; it’s the testament to it. May we honor him—not by silencing critics—but by choosing truth over hysteria, grace over gotchas, and the kind of backbone that keeps a republic breathing.

3 months ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

New VIDEO

3 months ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

It's so common to find posts regarding sharing assessment details of a personality profile. You know I have to respond to each one with something like...



95% of these tests are going to show very blurry results. I've made posts elsewhere regarding why. You are better off doing a 10 page vomit, or taking an assessment (and more than one time) that is inclusive to scoring on a more garnualar range not just functions, account for test bias, desirablility bias, prototype matching... I wouldn't suspect these tests that are made in 5 minutes to hold any insight, unfortunately.



Not advertising the one I'm building that will have a scoring engine behind it, but find something better and retest 2 or 3 times for variance/invariance.

3 months ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

Hot take: stop trying to correlate MBTI, Socionics, and Enneagram like they’re interchangeable data sets.

Most popular typologies have low test–retest reliability. Add in scoring quirks, response bias, situational stressors, and shifting life contexts—and you’ve got apples, oranges, and the occasional pineapple. 🍍

Rather than force 1:1 correlations, treat each framework as a modifier, not a mirror. Use them to add nuance, not to “prove” each other.

Why correlations fall short:
• Incomplete baselines: If your “base model” is partial (and they all are), every correlation sits on shaky ground.
• Human dynamism: People operate across multiple states; a single snapshot rarely captures the whole picture.
• Method issues: Real correlation would require large samples, robust scoring, longitudinal data, and careful bias control—rare in casual typing.

A better approach:
• Hypothesize, don’t conclude. Let models suggest lines of inquiry.
• Triangulate. Look for converging patterns across time and contexts, not one-off matches.
• Focus on utility. Ask, “Does this lens improve decisions, relationships, or performance?” If yes, keep it. If not, drop it.

Patterns that emerge can be meaningful—but they’re directional, not diagnostic. It’s a fun playground for beginners to mix models, but calling those mixes “correlations” is a stretch.

Treat typologies as tools, not truth. Calibrate for context, and let real-world outcomes be the judge. 💡

What’s your go-to way to use these models without overclaiming?

3 months ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

LIVE IN Applied Personality LAb: www.skool.com/live/B9TxdnSfpZ7

3 months ago | [YT] | 0

Daniel Speiss

PRISM Buddy Reviews: 3 Rituals to Cut Rework by Next Sprint

Most mistakes aren’t knowledge gaps—they’re perspective gaps.


Use PRISM counter-function pairs to build quick, reliable double-checks into your week.


1) Stand-Up “Two-Lens” Check (60 sec)

Assign a primary owner + a counter-buddy. Ask: “What are we not seeing?”

Data ↔ Values (Te ↔ Fi)

Logic ↔ People (Ti ↔ Fe)

Vision ↔ Reality (Ni ↔ Se)

Ideas ↔ Routines (Ne ↔ Si)


2) 10-Minute Pre-Commit

Before you ship or decide, the counter-buddy runs a fast “red team”:

What would make this fail?

Who’s affected & how would we know early?

What’s the smallest safe test?


3) Retro ‘Seat-Swap’

Owner defends the decision. Buddy narrates downstream impact.

Capture 1 invariant (rule, checklist item, or metric) into the SOP.

Quick Start (this week)


Pick one key decision type (pricing, roadmap, hiring, launch).

Map the default pair (e.g., Vision ↔ Reality for launches).

Calendar a 10-min pre-commit before the next go/no-go.

Add the invariant you learn to your checklist.

Want templates, live sessions, and examples?

Skool → www.skool.com/your-personality-blueprint
YouTube → youtube.com/@Danielspeiss

3 months ago | [YT] | 0