U are nothing against reality. ...Also uzun Hasan loved Iranian culture🇮🇷if Shah Ismail was successor of uzun Hasan so he should love iran. Right? what are u barking for? @Afshar1 @AltaicX
...خطبه شاه اسماعیل صفوی هنگام فتح تبریز شاه اسماعیل پس از فتح تبریز چنین گفت:
«من امروز به زمین فرود آمدم منم سرور و شاهنشاه. بدان به حقیقت که منم فرزند حیدر ، منم فریدون ، منم خسرو ، منم جمشید و منم ضحاک ، منم رستم پسر زال ، منم اسکندر ، سرّ اناالحق خفته است در این سینه‌ی من ، چون منم حقیقت مطلق و حقیقت آن باشد که ...»
***Why don't you accept that Shahnameh was more because of Persian culture and language. Exactly ferdowsi finished the Shahnameh in 378 but 10 yrs later his son died and he didn't have any money so he gave Shahnameh to sultan Mahmood to gain money then he started to make other Compilation of Shahnameh.
"promoting Iranian identity and culture, Recording and reviving Iranian history, Highlighting heroes and legendary figures, Moral education and human values, Revival and promotion of the Persian language." Some reasons that Shahnameh created for.
***The Safavids were a group similar to today's underground Freemasonry whose goal was to re-establish the Iranian Empire. For the rebirth of Iran, it was necessary for Iran to separate itself from the Arabs through a spiritual heritage, and that heritage was the Shiite element. Do you expect, for example, Shah Ismail to re-establish the Iranian Empire with the slogan of Cyrus the Great and Zoroaster?! While at that time, the only connection the Iranian people had with their ancient history was not Persepolis, but Ferdowsi's Shahnameh. An Iranian renaissance during the Safavid era was impossible without touching the Shiite element.
***Also ottoman was called rumi but they aren't Roman. So are safavid Qizilbash just because of a treaty? "رومی آمد بر در تبریز و بر خود رید و رفت ریده ریده از در تبریز واگردید و رفت..." @Afshar1@AltaicX
Yes u are right🤡 but the main Bloom of Persian culture, language, art and Architecture is for this period🇮🇷 continue yakking maybe u won this argument.
In the fifth one we have Shahnameh ferdowsi of Shah Ismail that he couldn't complete it because of his illness but his son completed it.@Afshar1@AltaicX In other hand You say that the Safavids were Turks and on the other hand you claim that the Shahnameh is a a..i-Turk book. In this case, due to the intense interest of Shah Ismail, Shah Tahmasp, and other Safavid kings in the Shahnameh, a question arises: Either Shah Ismail, Shah Tahmasp, and the Safavid kings were not Turks and did not consider themselves Turks, and for this reason they were not upset by reading the Shahnameh and loved it, or, contrary to the claims of the P@nT0rks, the Shahnameh is not a ra.c..t book against the Turks.
@Afshar1 @AltaicX *in first photo if u can find "as Azerbaijan land" in Farsi, i will be quite but no. I'm sure u can't.
*Also read the third photo well.
*The main reason that safavid called Qizilbash is that Qizilbashs had a lot of effect in safavid period (mainly until kingdom of Shah Abbas). On other hand Qizilbashs were the sign of safavid. Also ottoman was called "rumi" (Roman), so Are they Roman?
Iranian Nationalists Union
@Bilgulush نداشتن سواد تاریخی و سیاسی جرم نیست، ولی به خودت میخندن، امیدوارم آدم شی بی ریشه
1 week ago | [YT] | 11
View 3 replies
Iranian Nationalists Union
I prefer to save my sources for future. It's better that other people see them. @AltaicX @Afshar1
1 month ago | [YT] | 2
View 0 replies
Iranian Nationalists Union
U are nothing against reality.
...Also uzun Hasan loved Iranian culture🇮🇷if Shah Ismail was successor of uzun Hasan so he should love iran. Right? what are u barking for?
@Afshar1 @AltaicX
...خطبه شاه اسماعیل صفوی هنگام فتح تبریز
شاه اسماعیل پس از فتح تبریز چنین گفت:
«من امروز به زمین فرود آمدم منم سرور و شاهنشاه. بدان به حقیقت که منم فرزند حیدر ، منم فریدون ، منم خسرو ، منم جمشید و منم ضحاک ، منم رستم پسر زال ، منم اسکندر ، سرّ اناالحق خفته است در این سینه‌ی من ، چون منم حقیقت مطلق و حقیقت آن باشد که ...»
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 1
View 3 replies
Iranian Nationalists Union
***Why don't you accept that Shahnameh was more because of Persian culture and language.
Exactly ferdowsi finished the Shahnameh in 378 but 10 yrs later his son died and he didn't have any money so he gave Shahnameh to sultan Mahmood to gain money then he started to make other Compilation of Shahnameh.
"promoting Iranian identity and culture, Recording and reviving Iranian history, Highlighting heroes and legendary figures, Moral education and human values, Revival and promotion of the Persian language."
Some reasons that Shahnameh created for.
***The Safavids were a group similar to today's underground Freemasonry whose goal was to re-establish the Iranian Empire. For the rebirth of Iran, it was necessary for Iran to separate itself from the Arabs through a spiritual heritage, and that heritage was the Shiite element.
Do you expect, for example, Shah Ismail to re-establish the Iranian Empire with the slogan of Cyrus the Great and Zoroaster?!
While at that time, the only connection the Iranian people had with their ancient history was not Persepolis, but Ferdowsi's Shahnameh.
An Iranian renaissance during the Safavid era was impossible without touching the Shiite element.
***Also ottoman was called rumi but they aren't Roman. So are safavid Qizilbash just because of a treaty?
"رومی آمد بر در تبریز و بر خود رید و رفت
ریده ریده از در تبریز واگردید و رفت..."
@Afshar1 @AltaicX
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 5
View 1 reply
Iranian Nationalists Union
Yes u are right🤡 but the main Bloom of Persian culture, language, art and Architecture is for this period🇮🇷 continue yakking maybe u won this argument.
In the fifth one we have Shahnameh ferdowsi of Shah Ismail that he couldn't complete it because of his illness but his son completed it.@Afshar1 @AltaicX
In other hand You say that the Safavids were Turks and on the other hand you claim that the Shahnameh is a a..i-Turk book. In this case, due to the intense interest of Shah Ismail, Shah Tahmasp, and other Safavid kings in the Shahnameh, a question arises: Either Shah Ismail, Shah Tahmasp, and the Safavid kings were not Turks and did not consider themselves Turks, and for this reason they were not upset by reading the Shahnameh and loved it, or, contrary to the claims of the P@nT0rks, the Shahnameh is not a ra.c..t book against the Turks.
1 month ago | [YT] | 2
View 0 replies
Iranian Nationalists Union
@Afshar1 @AltaicX
*in first photo if u can find "as Azerbaijan land" in Farsi, i will be quite but no. I'm sure u can't.
*Also read the third photo well.
*The main reason that safavid called Qizilbash is that Qizilbashs had a lot of effect in safavid period (mainly until kingdom of Shah Abbas).
On other hand Qizilbashs were the sign of safavid.
Also ottoman was called "rumi" (Roman), so Are they Roman?
got smoked?😂🚬
@Amir-Iran992 @Persian_Gulf168
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 3
View 2 replies
Iranian Nationalists Union
Glory🔥🇮🇷the greatest culture that even Mongols became civilized with it.♥️🫡
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 15
View 1 reply
Iranian Nationalists Union
Yasha Turan buzurg🐺🤘🔥🇦🇿
1 month ago | [YT] | 6
View 4 replies
Load more