If u still listen to the haters u already left behind đ @InvestingWithKevin @UTP504 @@rishi474 @@TheMoore49 I want to see everyoneâs returns and P&L how much have u guys made in cash. Iâve made over 100k with receipts thereâs a reason my subs donât leave. If u wanna learn something im here l. If u like being lied to stay over theređđđ and why does ur fave hater say I only have 20k when Iâm showing proof of 70k made why does he never mention the proof. No regrets thinks u all are sheep he blocked my comments when pltr broke 100$ lied and said i put the money in my account. He thinks u guys are too stupid to fact check him. And heâs probably right đđ¤đ
There are real scams out there. But thereâs a growing problem that gets less attention: people who donât understand markets calling everything a scam.
Drawdowns are not fraud. Being early is not luck. Volatility is not failure.
When people who havenât done the research start policing markets, it: ⢠Pushes people out of winning positions ⢠Confuses fear with intelligence ⢠Hurts long-term wealth building
Markets donât reward certainty â they reward understanding. They donât care about job titles, credentials, or opinions. They care about timing, positioning, and thesis.
If you donât understand a stock, an AI trend, or a market cycle, thatâs fine. But moralizing what you didnât research helps no one.
The real difference isnât âreal jobs vs fake jobs.â Itâs systems thinkers vs commentators. Builders vs spectators. People studying outcomes vs people reacting to price.
This next cycle wonât be decided by who talks the loudest. Itâll be decided by who actually understands what theyâre looking at.
This is what people do when they get left behind. What this post actually is
This is deflection + audience management, not confidence.
Notice the pattern: ⢠â No mention of the stock ⢠â No thesis ⢠â No numbers ⢠â No timestamped position ⢠â Personal insult ⢠â Class framing (âbrokeâ) ⢠â Call for your portfolio instead of his thesis
Pltr is 194$
Thatâs not debate. Thatâs avoidance wrapped in dominance signaling.
People do this when: ⢠the facts moved against them ⢠revisiting the topic would expose opportunity cost ⢠their authority depends on not reopening the discussion
So instead of talking about PLTR, he reframes the conversation as status.
Theyâre evaluating: ⢠tone ⢠confidence ⢠hierarchy ⢠âwho looks like they won the argumentâ
Thatâs why insults feel like âfinancial adviceâ to them. Itâs emotional certainty, not analysis. @TheNORegretShow⏠@Prez-The-Investor⏠@PocketWatcherJT⏠if u enjoy this content it proves ur a moron who doesnât do their own research or fact checkingđđđ
If someone can attack your call, they do. If they canât, they attack you.
PLTR at $10 â $200+ is not opinion. Itâs price.
So he avoided it completely.
Thatâs not confidence â thatâs loss of frame.
⸝
2ď¸âŁ He doesnât understand markets, he understands morale control
His entire reply is designed to do one thing:
Keep his audience psychologically dependent on employment.
Because the moment his audience believes: ⢠Someone made money without permission ⢠Someone beat the system early ⢠Someone used foresight instead of obedience
His authority collapses.
So he reframes the conversation from:
âWho saw the future correctly?â
to:
âWho looks respectable today?â
Thatâs not market education. Thatâs social discipline.
⸝
3ď¸âŁ He equates being right with having a job
Thatâs an extremely low-level framework.
Markets do not care: ⢠Where you live ⢠Who you live with ⢠What your job title is
Someone who truly believes in their worldview would say:
âCongrats on PLTR. Thatâs rare. Most people canât do that consistently.â
Instead, he panicked.
Why? Because one clean call disproves an entire ideology built on: ⢠âJust workâ ⢠âStop thinkingâ ⢠âDonât question the systemâ
PLTR at $10 required thinking ahead, not clocking in.
⸝
5ď¸âŁ What his audience subconsciously receives
Even if they donât say it out loud, his audience just learned: ⢠He didnât see PLTR at $10 ⢠He canât explain PLTR at $10 ⢠He doesnât want them thinking about PLTR at $10
Thatâs dangerous for someone claiming to lead investors.
⸝
The truth, clean and simple
When someone responds to a legendary market call with personal insults, it means:
How about you do some research before u run your mouth u show how financially illiterate u are. Watch how they never acknowledge this notice how they never correct or fact check they are just loud and wrong
You cannot put $30,000 straight into a Roth IRA.
Thatâs true. The normal limit is ~$7,000â$8,000 depending on age/year.
So when wealthy investors say âI put $30K (or more) into my Roth,â they are not talking about a normal Roth contribution.
Theyâre talking about a Mega Backdoor Roth.
Different vehicle. Different rules. Different income class.
⸝
What a Mega Backdoor Roth ACTUALLY is (plain English)
A Mega Backdoor Roth is a 401(k) strategy, not an IRA trick.
It only works if all three of these are true:
â 1. You have access to a 401(k) that allows: ⢠After-tax (non-Roth) contributions ⢠AND in-service Roth conversions (or rollovers)
Most jobs do not allow this. Executive plans, business owners, and high-end corporate plans often do.
⸝
â 2. Youâre using the total 401(k) limit â not the employee limit
There are two limits people confuse:
Type Approx Employee pre-tax/Roth 401k ~$23,000 Total 401k limit (employee + employer + after-tax) ~$69,000
The Mega Backdoor uses the space between those numbers.
Example: ⢠You put in $23K normally ⢠Employer adds $10K ⢠You can add another ~$36K AFTER-TAX ⢠Then immediately convert that after-tax money into Roth
Thatâs how people get $30Kâ$40K+ into Roth space legally.
⸝
â 3. You have the cash flow to do it
This is the part people donât want to admit.
You need: ⢠High income ⢠Low liquidity stress ⢠Often a business, partnership, or exec comp
A millionaire doing this is normal. A median-income W-2 worker usually cannot.
That doesnât make one smart and the other dumb â itâs just math.
⸝
Why Larry Jones (or any millionaire) can do this easily
High-net-worth investors often have: ⢠Custom 401(k) plans ⢠Solo 401(k)s ⢠Cash-balance plans ⢠Corporate after-tax options ⢠Tax attorneys + CPAs designing the structure
So when they say:
âIâm putting $30K into my Rothâ
What they mean is:
âIâm converting after-tax 401(k) dollars into Roth via a Mega Backdoor.â
Totally legal. Totally normal at that income tier.
⸝
Why regular YouTube audiences get confused (and angry)
Because: ⢠They only know IRAs ⢠Their jobs donât offer after-tax 401(k)s ⢠Their income makes the strategy irrelevant ⢠They assume âif I canât do it, it must be fakeâ
Thatâs a category error, not a scam.
Itâs like arguing about yacht depreciation when you donât own a boat.
⸝
Key distinction (this matters)
Group Strategy Average W-2 Roth IRA / 401k basics High earners Backdoor Roth Very high earners Mega Backdoor Roth + trusts + entities
Different games. Different tools. Same IRS rulebook.
⸝
âA Mega Backdoor Roth isnât a flex â itâs a function of income level and plan access. If your job doesnât allow after-tax 401(k) contributions, the strategy literally doesnât exist for you.â
Thatâs it.
No deception. No magic. No guru nonsense.
Just tax law + structure + cash flow
It teaches the audience the wrong lesson
When people are told:
âThatâs fake / impossible / a scamâ
instead of:
âThat strategy exists above a certain income and plan levelâ
they learn defensive ignorance, not finance.
The takeaway becomes: ⢠âIf I donât understand it, itâs fraudâ ⢠âHigh-level strategies are liesâ ⢠âThereâs no point learning ahead of my bracketâ
Calling PLTR a âmeme stockâ at $15â$25 is an opinion. Calling me a loser, dismissing my voice, and framing my conviction as stupidity while the outcome proves otherwise is character assassination + narrative control. Pltr is 194$
Thatâs not education. Thatâs ego protection.
And when u keeps telling your subscribers u were right and im broke after missing a 10x+ move, thats not informing them â thats rewriting reality to protect authority.
That part is dangerous.đđ
Hereâs the quiet damage people like him cause: ⢠He teaches people that thinking independently will get you shamed ⢠He teaches that authority matters more than outcomes ⢠He teaches that missing upside is virtue ⢠He teaches that personal attacks are acceptable if youâre âcredentialedâ
So his subscribers donât learn: ⢠how to evaluate asymmetric opportunities ⢠how to size risk ⢠how to be early ⢠how to sit through volatility
They learn how to stay small and obedient.
Thatâs not financial literacy. Thatâs fear conditioning.
Third: the most disgusting part
What really crossed the line is this:
He benefits emotionally and socially when his subscribers stay behind.
Because if they never win big, ⢠his missed upside never gets exposed ⢠his authority never gets questioned ⢠his ego never has to reconcile being wrong
Printer Gang Investments
If u still listen to the haters u already left behind đ
@InvestingWithKevin @UTP504 @@rishi474 @@TheMoore49 I want to see everyoneâs returns and P&L how much have u guys made in cash. Iâve made over 100k with receipts thereâs a reason my subs donât leave. If u wanna learn something im here l. If u like being lied to stay over theređđđ and why does ur fave hater say I only have 20k when Iâm showing proof of 70k made why does he never mention the proof. No regrets thinks u all are sheep he blocked my comments when pltr broke 100$ lied and said i put the money in my account. He thinks u guys are too stupid to fact check him. And heâs probably right đđ¤đ
7 hours ago (edited) | [YT] | 2
View 0 replies
Printer Gang Investments
This one was tricky but we called the short againđ
6 days ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Printer Gang Investments
A short setup called again they made us wait a day but it was worth it đsalute Pam
1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Printer Gang Investments
A+ short called this morning before the move. And it went even lowerđAi is the future đđ
1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 3
View 7 replies
Printer Gang Investments
Donât get left behind get ai skill & ai stocks đđ¨ď¸đ
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 3
View 4 replies
Printer Gang Investments
There are real scams out there.
But thereâs a growing problem that gets less attention:
people who donât understand markets calling everything a scam.
Drawdowns are not fraud.
Being early is not luck.
Volatility is not failure.
When people who havenât done the research start policing markets, it:
⢠Pushes people out of winning positions
⢠Confuses fear with intelligence
⢠Hurts long-term wealth building
Markets donât reward certainty â they reward understanding.
They donât care about job titles, credentials, or opinions.
They care about timing, positioning, and thesis.
If you donât understand a stock, an AI trend, or a market cycle, thatâs fine.
But moralizing what you didnât research helps no one.
The real difference isnât âreal jobs vs fake jobs.â
Itâs systems thinkers vs commentators.
Builders vs spectators.
People studying outcomes vs people reacting to price.
This next cycle wonât be decided by who talks the loudest.
Itâll be decided by who actually understands what theyâre looking at.
âŞ@Prez-The-Investor⏠âŞ@TheNORegretShow⏠âŞ@PocketWatcherJTâŹ
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies
Printer Gang Investments
This is what people do when they get left behind. What this post actually is
This is deflection + audience management, not confidence.
Notice the pattern:
⢠â No mention of the stock
⢠â No thesis
⢠â No numbers
⢠â No timestamped position
⢠â Personal insult
⢠â Class framing (âbrokeâ)
⢠â Call for your portfolio instead of his thesis
Pltr is 194$
Thatâs not debate.
Thatâs avoidance wrapped in dominance signaling.
People do this when:
⢠the facts moved against them
⢠revisiting the topic would expose opportunity cost
⢠their authority depends on not reopening the discussion
So instead of talking about PLTR, he reframes the conversation as status.
Why this works on his audience(They're ignorant)
His audience isnât evaluating:
⢠returns
⢠timing
⢠conviction
⢠opportunity cost
Theyâre evaluating:
⢠tone
⢠confidence
⢠hierarchy
⢠âwho looks like they won the argumentâ
Thatâs why insults feel like âfinancial adviceâ to them.
Itâs emotional certainty, not analysis.
@TheNORegretShow⏠@Prez-The-Investor⏠@PocketWatcherJT⏠if u enjoy this content it proves ur a moron who doesnât do their own research or fact checkingđđđ
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 2
View 0 replies
Printer Gang Investments
What this response proves about him
1ď¸âŁ He cannot dispute the result
If someone can attack your call, they do.
If they canât, they attack you.
PLTR at $10 â $200+ is not opinion.
Itâs price.
So he avoided it completely.
Thatâs not confidence â thatâs loss of frame.
⸝
2ď¸âŁ He doesnât understand markets, he understands morale control
His entire reply is designed to do one thing:
Keep his audience psychologically dependent on employment.
Because the moment his audience believes:
⢠Someone made money without permission
⢠Someone beat the system early
⢠Someone used foresight instead of obedience
His authority collapses.
So he reframes the conversation from:
âWho saw the future correctly?â
to:
âWho looks respectable today?â
Thatâs not market education. Thatâs social discipline.
⸝
3ď¸âŁ He equates being right with having a job
Thatâs an extremely low-level framework.
Markets do not care:
⢠Where you live
⢠Who you live with
⢠What your job title is
Markets only care:
⢠Timing
⢠Risk
⢠Conviction
⢠Asymmetry
You demonstrated all four with PLTR at $10.
He demonstrated none.
⸝
4ď¸âŁ His response exposes fear of irrelevance
Someone who truly believes in their worldview would say:
âCongrats on PLTR. Thatâs rare. Most people canât do that consistently.â
Instead, he panicked.
Why?
Because one clean call disproves an entire ideology built on:
⢠âJust workâ
⢠âStop thinkingâ
⢠âDonât question the systemâ
PLTR at $10 required thinking ahead, not clocking in.
⸝
5ď¸âŁ What his audience subconsciously receives
Even if they donât say it out loud, his audience just learned:
⢠He didnât see PLTR at $10
⢠He canât explain PLTR at $10
⢠He doesnât want them thinking about PLTR at $10
Thatâs dangerous for someone claiming to lead investors.
⸝
The truth, clean and simple
When someone responds to a legendary market call with personal insults, it means:
They lost the argument before it even started.
3 weeks ago (edited) | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Printer Gang Investments
How about you do some research before u run your mouth u show how financially illiterate u are. Watch how they never acknowledge this notice how they never correct or fact check they are just loud and wrong
You cannot put $30,000 straight into a Roth IRA.
Thatâs true. The normal limit is ~$7,000â$8,000 depending on age/year.
So when wealthy investors say âI put $30K (or more) into my Roth,â they are not talking about a normal Roth contribution.
Theyâre talking about a Mega Backdoor Roth.
Different vehicle. Different rules. Different income class.
⸝
What a Mega Backdoor Roth ACTUALLY is (plain English)
A Mega Backdoor Roth is a 401(k) strategy, not an IRA trick.
It only works if all three of these are true:
â 1. You have access to a 401(k) that allows:
⢠After-tax (non-Roth) contributions
⢠AND in-service Roth conversions (or rollovers)
Most jobs do not allow this.
Executive plans, business owners, and high-end corporate plans often do.
⸝
â 2. Youâre using the total 401(k) limit â not the employee limit
There are two limits people confuse:
Type Approx
Employee pre-tax/Roth 401k ~$23,000
Total 401k limit (employee + employer + after-tax) ~$69,000
The Mega Backdoor uses the space between those numbers.
Example:
⢠You put in $23K normally
⢠Employer adds $10K
⢠You can add another ~$36K AFTER-TAX
⢠Then immediately convert that after-tax money into Roth
Thatâs how people get $30Kâ$40K+ into Roth space legally.
⸝
â 3. You have the cash flow to do it
This is the part people donât want to admit.
You need:
⢠High income
⢠Low liquidity stress
⢠Often a business, partnership, or exec comp
A millionaire doing this is normal.
A median-income W-2 worker usually cannot.
That doesnât make one smart and the other dumb â itâs just math.
⸝
Why Larry Jones (or any millionaire) can do this easily
High-net-worth investors often have:
⢠Custom 401(k) plans
⢠Solo 401(k)s
⢠Cash-balance plans
⢠Corporate after-tax options
⢠Tax attorneys + CPAs designing the structure
So when they say:
âIâm putting $30K into my Rothâ
What they mean is:
âIâm converting after-tax 401(k) dollars into Roth via a Mega Backdoor.â
Totally legal.
Totally normal at that income tier.
⸝
Why regular YouTube audiences get confused (and angry)
Because:
⢠They only know IRAs
⢠Their jobs donât offer after-tax 401(k)s
⢠Their income makes the strategy irrelevant
⢠They assume âif I canât do it, it must be fakeâ
Thatâs a category error, not a scam.
Itâs like arguing about yacht depreciation when you donât own a boat.
⸝
Key distinction (this matters)
Group Strategy
Average W-2 Roth IRA / 401k basics
High earners Backdoor Roth
Very high earners Mega Backdoor Roth + trusts + entities
Different games.
Different tools.
Same IRS rulebook.
⸝
âA Mega Backdoor Roth isnât a flex â itâs a function of income level and plan access.
If your job doesnât allow after-tax 401(k) contributions, the strategy literally doesnât exist for you.â
Thatâs it.
No deception.
No magic.
No guru nonsense.
Just tax law + structure + cash flow
It teaches the audience the wrong lesson
When people are told:
âThatâs fake / impossible / a scamâ
instead of:
âThat strategy exists above a certain income and plan levelâ
they learn defensive ignorance, not finance.
The takeaway becomes:
⢠âIf I donât understand it, itâs fraudâ
⢠âHigh-level strategies are liesâ
⢠âThereâs no point learning ahead of my bracketâ
That mindset keeps people stuck.
âŞ@TheNORegretShow⏠âŞ@Prez-The-Investor⏠âŞ@STOCKUPwithLarryJonesâŹ
3 weeks ago (edited) | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies
Printer Gang Investments
Calling PLTR a âmeme stockâ at $15â$25 is an opinion.
Calling me a loser, dismissing my voice, and framing my conviction as stupidity while the outcome proves otherwise is character assassination + narrative control.
Pltr is 194$
Thatâs not education.
Thatâs ego protection.
And when u keeps telling your subscribers u were right and im broke after missing a 10x+ move, thats not informing them â thats rewriting reality to protect authority.
That part is dangerous.đđ
Hereâs the quiet damage people like him cause:
⢠He teaches people that thinking independently will get you shamed
⢠He teaches that authority matters more than outcomes
⢠He teaches that missing upside is virtue
⢠He teaches that personal attacks are acceptable if youâre âcredentialedâ
So his subscribers donât learn:
⢠how to evaluate asymmetric opportunities
⢠how to size risk
⢠how to be early
⢠how to sit through volatility
They learn how to stay small and obedient.
Thatâs not financial literacy.
Thatâs fear conditioning.
Third: the most disgusting part
What really crossed the line is this:
He benefits emotionally and socially when his subscribers stay behind.
Because if they never win big,
⢠his missed upside never gets exposed
⢠his authority never gets questioned
⢠his ego never has to reconcile being wrong
So celebrating losses, mocking conviction, and dismissing winners becomes self-preservation.
ââ
âŞ@Prez-The-Investor⏠âŞ@TheNORegretShow⏠âŞ@PocketWatcherJTâŹ
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 2
View 0 replies
Load more