Boundless/tier 0 debunk: Most people think boundless is highest tier of tiering system but people literally ignore to vote logic and omnipotent paradox Explanation of debunk: Boundless follow the omnipotent paradox for example: a boundless character can create a stone that is stronger than him ? If yes then he isn't bcuz it create something new he can't ,if no there is already he can't do
To be boundless you don't have to be boundaries but the defiantion itself create boundaries ,that defiantion exclude character that have boundaries , so boundless is self refuting ,the defiantion itself create a limit
2nd boundless claim character must be beyond all heiarchy ,but the question is "being above all properties " is a state or property? If yes then their exist a heiarchy of states /properly,in that heiarchy 'beyond all heiarchy' is one position , therefore there is heiarchy that include state of being above all heiarchy,to fix this you need to be beyond all heiarchy that include being beyond all heiarchy ,but that another heiarchy invite regress begins
3rd they claim the character transdent the concept of transdent which is nonsence ,to transdent the concept you must have outside it ,but being outside the concept is itself relationship to that concept ,that relationship is form of transdent , therefore you are using the concept of transdence to claim you are beyond it ,this is performative contradiction like saying " I'm am not speaking" while speaking itself
4th verse a claim character x is boundless and verse b claim that character y is boundless,to compare we need a framework that include both ,the framework is by defiantion,above both character , therefore neither is boundless ,both are bound by cross verse framework, the only escape is to claim that both character is same being across the verse ,but then A.that a claim with no evidence b.it mean no distinct boundless character can exist 5th to claim it have no limit you have to examine all possible scenarios but that is infinite scenario which Cannot be done , therefore no limit is faith based claim
Overall : Boundless scale to nowhere and even below 0d bcuz a 0D point exists logically an incoherent Boundless being does not existence > Non-existence
Share this post as much to share the debunks so people could know about this debate and better understanding of ontology and tier . Let's bring logic back to powerscaling. 🔥and if someone disagree with this debate then it okay if you want we can debate about this
DIRECTORQUITTQUIT
Boundless/tier 0 debunk:
Most people think boundless is highest tier of tiering system but people literally ignore to vote logic and omnipotent paradox
Explanation of debunk:
Boundless follow the omnipotent paradox for example: a boundless character can create a stone that is stronger than him ? If yes then he isn't bcuz it create something new he can't ,if no there is already he can't do
To be boundless you don't have to be boundaries but the defiantion itself create boundaries ,that defiantion exclude character that have boundaries , so boundless is self refuting ,the defiantion itself create a limit
2nd boundless claim character must be beyond all heiarchy ,but the question is "being above all properties " is a state or property? If yes then their exist a heiarchy of states /properly,in that heiarchy 'beyond all heiarchy' is one position , therefore there is heiarchy that include state of being above all heiarchy,to fix this you need to be beyond all heiarchy that include being beyond all heiarchy ,but that another heiarchy invite regress begins
3rd they claim the character transdent the concept of transdent which is nonsence ,to transdent the concept you must have outside it ,but being outside the concept is itself relationship to that concept ,that relationship is form of transdent , therefore you are using the concept of transdence to claim you are beyond it ,this is performative contradiction like saying " I'm am not speaking" while speaking itself
4th verse a claim character x is boundless and verse b claim that character y is boundless,to compare we need a framework that include both ,the framework is by defiantion,above both character , therefore neither is boundless ,both are bound by cross verse framework, the only escape is to claim that both character is same being across the verse ,but then
A.that a claim with no evidence
b.it mean no distinct boundless character can exist
5th to claim it have no limit you have to examine all possible scenarios but that is infinite scenario which Cannot be done , therefore no limit is faith based claim
Overall :
Boundless scale to nowhere and even below 0d bcuz a 0D point exists logically an incoherent Boundless being does not existence > Non-existence
Share this post as much to share the debunks so people could know about this debate and better understanding of ontology and tier . Let's bring logic back to powerscaling. 🔥and if someone disagree with this debate then it okay if you want we can debate about this
Mention:‪@SteamhappyEdits‬​​​ ‪@IAmTheOneWhoSees‬​​​ ‪@Ambushgamereditz‬​​​ ‪@BobertEdits‬​​​ ‪@CC385EXETheTHCarryer‬​​​ ‪@error-404-exe8‬​​​ ‪@EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE12‬​​​ ‪@Accnotinuse12‬​​​ ‪@simply_shadowed4685‬​​​ ‪@foxgaming2023‬​​​‪@Fusion3sEdits‬​
14 hours ago (edited) | [YT] | 0
View 4 replies
DIRECTORQUITTQUIT
Hey ‪@IAmTheOneWhoSees‬​​ ‪@SteamhappyEdits‬‪@Accnotinuse12‬ ​ have u got discord and what's is your discord name 😅 I'll wanna communicate to u much better
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 1
View 7 replies
DIRECTORQUITTQUIT
‪@CC385EXETheTHCarryer‬
8 months ago | [YT] | 0
View 2 replies
Load more