The Time Patriots

A serious case of alleged medical negligence has come to light at District Bagla Hospital in Hathras, where doctors reportedly applied a plaster cast to the wrong hand of a four-year-old child.

The incident occurred on Thursday afternoon in Ahwaranpur village under Mursan block. The child, Harsh, had suffered a fracture in a finger of his left hand while playing at home and was taken to the hospital for treatment.

According to the family, an X-ray was conducted at the hospital, which confirmed the fracture in the left hand. They stated that ₹70 was charged for the X-ray and plaster procedure.

However, after treatment, the child was taken back home, where he continued crying in pain. Upon checking, his father Kanhaiya discovered that the plaster had been mistakenly applied to the child’s right hand instead of the injured left hand.

The family expressed outrage over the alleged negligence and filed complaints with Hathras Gate Police Station and the Health Department, demanding strict action against those responsible.

Chief Medical Officer Dr Rajiv Rai confirmed that the matter has been taken into cognisance and an investigation has been initiated.

#Hathras #MedicalNegligence #BreakingNews #HealthCare #IndiaNews

1 week ago | [YT] | 1

The Time Patriots

Bengaluru (Karnataka): A 30-year-old woman died after allegedly suffering an electric shock while operating a washing machine in Gowdahalli under Bengaluru North taluk, raising suspicion over whether the incident was accidental or involved foul play.

The deceased has been identified as Sujatha (30), a native of Heggere in Tumakuru district. She was married to a real estate businessman for the past 10 years.

According to initial reports, the incident occurred around 7:30 am when Sujatha was using a washing machine at her residence. She was immediately rushed to VP Magnus Hospital, where doctors declared her dead.

However, her parents have raised serious allegations, claiming that her death may not be accidental. They stated that there had been frequent disputes between the couple and alleged harassment in the marriage.

Family members further claimed that Sujatha had left her marital home about a month ago due to ongoing issues and had returned only a week ago after being persuaded by her husband and in-laws. They have questioned the circumstances of her death occurring within days of her return.

Following the incident, the body was shifted to Victoria Hospital for post-mortem examination.

Police have registered a case and stated that the exact cause of death will be confirmed after the post-mortem report. Further investigation is underway to determine whether the death was accidental or otherwise.

#Bengaluru #Karnataka #BreakingNews #MysteryDeath #Investigation

1 week ago | [YT] | 0

The Time Patriots

Hassan (Karnataka): A 25-year-old software engineer from Hassan district passed away after suffering a severe brain hemorrhage, leaving her family and community in deep grief.

The deceased, Shwetha, was the daughter of Gangadhar and Saroja, residents of Bandilakkanakoppalu village in Belur taluk. She had been working at Magna Soft in Hassan for the past three years.

According to family members, Shwetha suddenly collapsed at her residence on the evening of April 25. She was immediately rushed to a nearby hospital, but had already slipped into a coma.

Doctors later diagnosed her with severe brain bleeding. Despite treatment, her condition deteriorated, and she was declared brain dead before eventually passing away.

In a compassionate gesture, her parents expressed their willingness to donate her organs to help others. However, due to medical complications, organ donation could not be carried out.

Her funeral is scheduled to take place in her native village. The sudden demise of the young professional has cast a pall of gloom over the region, with colleagues and residents mourning the loss.

#Hassan #Karnataka #BreakingNews #Obituary #BrainHemorrhage

1 week ago | [YT] | 0

The Time Patriots

youtube.com/shorts/Ze37ITBjYE...

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 0

The Time Patriots

youtube.com/shorts/Ze37ITBjYE...

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 0

The Time Patriots

New Delhi: The Supreme Court, while hearing a divorce plea from a couple living separately for over 16 years, declined to dissolve the marriage and instead directed the husband to continue paying ₹15,000 monthly maintenance to his wife.

During the hearing, the husband’s counsel argued that the prolonged separation and ongoing incompatibility justified granting a divorce. He submitted that his client had been living apart from his wife for over a decade and a half and was already paying ₹15,000 per month as maintenance.

However, the wife opposed the plea, stating that she was willing to resume cohabitation and had conveyed the same to her husband. This prompted the court to observe that the possibility of reconciliation could not be ruled out.

The Bench remarked, “Keep your wife with you,” indicating that the marriage could still be preserved despite the long separation.

When the husband cited “temperamental issues” as the reason for the breakdown, the court shifted focus to financial aspects, questioning whether a higher amount could be offered as permanent alimony. The Bench also noted that ₹15,000 per month was “hardly anything these days.”

In response, the husband told the court that he earns around ₹65,000 per month, has no pension, and lacks the financial capacity to increase the maintenance amount. He also stated that he is 54 years old.

The court, however, directed that the existing arrangement should continue and declined to grant a divorce. When the plea was pressed again, the Bench remarked, “Shaanti se baithe raho, dete raho ₹15,000, khush raho.”

The case highlights the court’s emphasis on reconciliation and financial responsibility, even in long-standing marital disputes.

#SupremeCourt #DivorceCase #Maintenance #IndiaLaw #Marriage

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 1

The Time Patriots

New Delhi: In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court on April 16 held that a woman and her family cannot be prosecuted for “giving” dowry based solely on statements made in their complaint against those accused of demanding dowry.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and K. Vinod Chandran dismissed an appeal filed by a husband who sought registration of an FIR against his wife and her family under the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The husband argued that his wife had admitted to giving dowry in her complaint against him, which, according to him, amounted to an offence under Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. However, the Court rejected this contention.

Relying on Section 7(3) of the Act, the Court clarified that statements made by an aggrieved person in a complaint regarding dowry demand cannot be used as the basis to prosecute them for “giving” dowry.

The bench observed that such statements are protected under law and cannot become grounds for initiating criminal proceedings against the complainant. It emphasised that the intent of the law is to shield victims from being penalised for coming forward.

The case stemmed from an FIR initially filed by the wife under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, accusing her husband and his family of dowry-related offences. In response, the husband filed a counter-complaint seeking action against the wife and her family for allegedly giving dowry.

A magistrate had earlier dismissed the husband’s plea to register an FIR, which was upheld by the Supreme Court.

However, the Court clarified that if there is independent evidence proving the act of giving dowry—beyond statements made in the complaint—then prosecution under Section 3 of the Act could still be possible.

The Court concluded that where allegations of dowry giving are based solely on the complainant’s own statements, the protection under Section 7(3) applies, and no prosecution can be initiated.

#SupremeCourt #DowryLaw #LegalNews #IndiaLaw #BreakingNews

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 3

The Time Patriots

In a heartbreaking incident from Sri Ganganagar, a family was left in tears after the Rajasthan Board of Secondary Education (RBSE) declared Class 12 results, as their daughter—who scored over 93%—passed away just days before the announcement.

Nikita, a student of Government Senior Secondary School in Rawla tehsil, secured around 93.8% in the Arts stream. However, she died on March 20, nearly 10 days before the results were declared.

When the family checked her result online, the house fell silent. Her mother broke down, clutching Nikita’s photograph, recalling her daughter’s dream of becoming a civil servant. Family members said she was a bright student with strong academic records, having earlier scored over 90% in Class 10.

According to relatives, Nikita had been battling diabetes since Class 8 and was also suffering from hepatitis. Despite high fever and health complications, she continued her exams with insulin support, determined to perform well.

Her grandfather said the family had high hopes for her future, but her untimely death has left them devastated.

The RBSE results brought celebration to many, but for this family, it turned into a moment of grief, highlighting a painful story of determination, loss, and unfulfilled dreams.

#SriGanganagar #RBSE #BoardResults #EmotionalNews #StudentLife

1 month ago | [YT] | 4

The Time Patriots

In a significant ruling from Madhya Pradesh High Court, a woman from Gwalior was allowed to live with her partner after she refused to return to her husband, stating that her marriage had been arranged against her will.

The incident reached court after the husband filed a habeas corpus petition, alleging that his wife was being kept in illegal custody by one Sandeep Jatav.

During the hearing, the woman told the court that she is an adult and is living with her partner by her own choice. She clarified that no one had forced or confined her. She further stated that her marriage, which took place on May 4, 2023, was arranged by her family without her consent, and she does not wish to continue it.

The woman informed the court that she has been living with Sandeep Jatav since February 2024 and is currently six months pregnant. She expressed her desire to continue living with him and make independent decisions about her life.

On the other hand, the husband told the court that he was willing to accept both his wife and the unborn child. However, the woman firmly refused to return.

After hearing both sides, the court observed that the woman is a major and not under illegal detention. It ruled that she has the full right to choose where and with whom she wants to live.

The court subsequently dismissed the petition, stating there were no grounds to proceed further.

#Gwalior #HighCourt #RightToChoose #LiveInRelationship #LegalNews

1 month ago | [YT] | 4

The Time Patriots

1 month ago | [YT] | 2