CWJahTube

If you're new to the whole John 12:41 misinterpretation as it relates to Isaiah 6, 52, and 53, here is a brief, clear introduction to what the text means and how Trinitarians misuse it. See the other videos linked in the description for more extended discussion of all the issues.

1 week ago | [YT] | 12

CWJahTube

It's just so over...

Share this with anyone who brings up John 12:41. After they watch it, ask them to summarize the main points. That will result in a Game Over, which is another win for you, for the truth, and for God!

1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 12

CWJahTube

Someone recently asked me for my Acts 7 / angels discussion video and, though I've discussed it in several videos, I had never clipped any of them and many of my angel-discussion videos are in a CWJah series that did not label each video's title so you would know what texts were discussed, unfortunately, or even which subjects in some cases. I am changing that. But I had not done so when I was asked for my Acts 7 video a couple weeks ago, so I gave the commenter a link to my Comments Review #7 video, which does discussion Acts 7 in part (it's also linked in the description to this clip, if you want it).

I have since found my longer discussion of Acts 7, which was from one of my videos from a couple years ago in the "Angel(s) of Jaho(h) in Zechariah" series. I have retitled it, as you can see from the description linked in this clip's description and reference to its source, or if you search for "Acts 7" at my channel, now it will come up. I'll change the other videos' titles to be more descriptive and searchable as well. In any case, now you have this clip of what is probably my best discussion of the Acts 7 importance to understanding the angels of Jaho(h) in the OT, which has nothing to do with any of them being part of a triune god!

This clip reviews all the "angel" references in Acts Chapter 7 and how these OT texts are interpreted in Acts 7, which is to identify the one speaking in the cited accounts, not as "God" (like the original accounts indicate), but as "angels," and not just one angel, but as more than one since they all speak for and as God without actually being God. That's what angels, and many humans (Moses, Isaiah, Jesus), do.

All angels in the Bible are created spirits according to Psalm 104:4 and Hebrews 1:7, 14, 'spirits born from spirits' like Jesus taught in John 3:6 since "all things" are "out of God" (1 Corinthians 8:6) and "God is a spirit / spirit" (John 4:24), with Jesus as a spirit being the 'firstborn" one of these created angel-sons, the "chief" (arch-) one (1 Thessalonians 4:16), who also only speaks the words God taught him.--John 7:16-17; 14:1-10; 12:49-50; Colossians 1:15-20; Hebrews 1:1-6; Revelation 1:1.

Enjoy and share with everyone!

1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 15

CWJahTube

There is no Trinity anywhere in the Bible. Always, God is a personal being with his own nature (spirit). He is also "one," not two, not three, and not any more than "one." The great SHEMA of Deuteronomy 6:4 and Paul's restatement of it in Galatians 3:20 both prove "God" is a single, personal being, the Father. Simple, and also clearly stated for non-pagan Christians in 1 Corinthians 8:6, confirmed in 1 Timothy 2:5, both also discussed in this clip from the longer video linked in the description. Share and enjoy so we can help others see who the God of the Bible REALLY is...

1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 16

CWJahTube

I want to thank ‪@JakeBrancatella2.0‬ for the time and especially for the effort he put into making and then making available his new book, "The Making of the Trinity: From Christ to Constantinople." You can and you should get it. Here is one way: a.co/d/03HQsGVW

Jake's book provides biblical (= non-Trinitarian) Christians with an incredible tool for both learned and unlearned people to have at the ready a complete tool to discuss the history of the Trinity prior to its creedal formulation under the watch of and with a key term contributed by a pagan Roman Emperor (one who just claimed to have had a vision of a sign in which he was told to "conquer," ie, go and kill people in Jesus' name...by the way). No longer will you need to gather a bunch or books or link to numerous sources and then try to use them in order while talking to someone. Nope. Just pull out Jake's book, look up the subject writer, and away the Trinity's history goes!

Thanks again, Jake. I'd do a show (and eventually probably will) and discuss key parts of your book, if I had the time. But... I'm sure it will come up in many places soon for discussion, if they dare. If so, priorities can always change... That's what's so great about this book--it's a HUGE time saver for any discussion about Trinity pre-Nicaea. You have the Bible and what we've done to remove the Trinity from any consideration of biblical legitimization. Now its history ('where's your history?' uh huh...) has collapsed and all Trinitarians are left with are a bunch of "weeds" (just like the Master said [Matthew 13]) and creeds. "Weeds" and creeds... I like that. For them. Again... all that's left... of Trinity. It fits. Deal with it.

"Weeds" and creeds. Don't forget when they ask about 'your history.' From the Bible to those opposing Ignatius, as I have shown, our history of doctrine and its source is clear ("what is written"), even if we don't know everyone's name throughout history who adhered to it, just like we don't have the names of those whom Ignatius opposed, though we know through him as we do through the preserved texts... they existed. Hence, here we are today! Ok. Back to Trinity. Jake. Book. Go. Get. Read. Done. Time saved. No Trinity. All good even if no one is good, because only God is good just like Jesus said while denying it for himself (Mark 10:18). Sam! ‪@shamounian‬

With the Trinity hopefully now GONE... let's focus more on charity, on our neighbors, and most of all on praising God (for us, Jah) in Jesus' name! Enjoy the book and the time it will save many of you, and hopefully change many others of you, to the right Way, the non-Trinitarian Way, of John Chapter 14.

1 week ago | [YT] | 62

CWJahTube

We need to do this before we begin the "Angels of Jaho(h) in Isaiah" series. The reason has everything to do with how badly Trinitarians misinterpret "talking" or speech texts in Isaiah, and in other books of the Bible such as Revelation (I'll do a similar video on that book...), but here more specifically, Isaiah 48:16. Though we recently discussed this text and put out extended live and clipped discussions of Isaiah 48:16, in those videos we read from Isaiah 40-63 to identify the speakers leading up to Isaiah 48:16. I also brought in some related texts from the surrounding chapters. But I recently completed an even more extended / complete re-reading of Isaiah and while doing so I made note of all the different speech patterns and speakers in every single chapter. I have also condensed my notes to be able to review with you, and to provide as a handout, so that you can use the handout or the video, or both, to help Trinitarians or anyone else understand how the book of Isaiah is written, how the speakers are presented throughout the entire book, and how once you see this there is no way you will fall victim to Trinitarians' MISinterpretations of Isaiah 48:16. I'll need a little more time to edit the handout, which will also be what we review live. So I've moved the show from today to tomorrow 6 PM California time. See you there!

3 weeks ago (edited) | [YT] | 20

CWJahTube

I cut out the first 4 minutes with the audio issue. The chat stayed since it was being recorded. Enjoy!

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 16

CWJahTube

Not one single Trinitarian has had the courage to answer one single argument in the context of this video...NONE. Not even blubber butt  @shamounian  or ANY of his lame followers. Awwwee... What's the matter boys, too much for you?

Not ONE SINGLE comment during the 3 hour live or since then. NONE. Anyone who ever brings up John 12:41 just show them this video and ask them to read the comments. In which the humiliation of Trinitarians is manifest by NO RESPONSE. ****NOTHING****

This game is officially OVER. But not the podcast, which is tonight, during which we will celebrate the defeat of Trinitarian theology and its absolute failure to interpret John 12:41. So stupid... but who else would support Sam, right? Gone!

3 weeks ago (edited) | [YT] | 16

CWJahTube

Live show later today...

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 17

CWJahTube

Enjoy and share with everyone, especially those who may be confused or in doubt about Watchtower and its teachings about 1914, the "great crowd" of Revelation 7, and how they are serving in God's "temple" (Greek: NAOS) if they are on earth... which is exactly what they are doing as Revelation 21:22-22:3 proves.

4 weeks ago | [YT] | 17