Dr. Dan Mason Ph.D

Welcome to my channel ... I’m Dr. Dan Mason— I run forensic audits on high-impact claims in science, media, and public policy. I separate claim level from evidence, track assumptions, and demand clear constraints, uncertainty bounds, and a real failure hinge. I do not “debate vibes.” I audit what’s on the page
Subscribe now.

View channel on YouTube

Switch Invidious Instance

Videos

Shorts

Livestreams

Podcasts

Playlists

Posts

Dr. Dan Mason Ph.D

Response to Atheist Misinterpretations of Biblical Events.... Darante, your evaluation depends (it fails) on collapsing distinct biblical events into a single undifferentiated historical window and then judging them all by the same modern evidentiary standard, which creates a false picture of what the texts actually claim. Darante, you then move from Babel to Egypt to Joshua to Matthew as if they belong to one synchronized timeline, even though Scripture, knowing full well that they are placed thousands of years apart and in different cultural contexts, with various kinds of records and preservation conditions. By doing this, you demand Egyptian (tell us the timeline) archives for pre-Egyptian events (you do not know your dates), geological layers (you have no facts) for covenant narratives, and global astronomical logs for localized battlefield miracles, without ever defining (you are simply building Strawmen) which dynasty, which stratum, or which chronological model you are actually testing. Darante, your conflation of chronology and categorization lets you treat silence as disproof (you are only fooling yourself), when in reality it only shows that you are looking for the wrong kind of evidence in the wrong place at the wrong time. A genuine forensic approach would first establish the biblical timeline (which you did not) and category of each event, then ask what traces should reasonably exist given how ancient societies (but you know your audience; they are not here for the facts) recorded history and how systems preserve information, instead of flattening centuries of Scripture into a single modern scientific grid and calling the mismatch a refutation.