PeaceKeepers

Images like this paint a picture of a future where your rights are no longer rights, but conditional privileges that can be revoked at any moment. This is a political narrative designed to cause fear.

​Let's move beyond fear and into legal fact. Politics is the problem. Principle is the solution.
​Our constitution is built on a public trust. In this trust, the people are the beneficiaries, and the State is the fiduciary trustee. The most precious asset held in this trust—the "trust property"—is the people's "true, auntient and indubitable Rights and Liberties".

​These are your common law rights to liberty, privacy, and personal autonomy. They are your "birthright".

​The State-trustee has one primary, non-negotiable duty: to protect the trust property.

​This brings us to the fundamental question of principle that this image, for all its political messaging, raises:

​Can a trustee lawfully turn the beneficiary's absolute rights into conditional privileges to be granted or denied based on the trustee's own agenda?

​The answer, according to the principles of fiduciary duty and the Rule of Law, is an emphatic no. A system where rights are conditional is a system of arbitrary power, which is fundamentally unlawful.

​Our task is not to fear a fictional future, but to enforce the profound legal duties that protect us in the present.

​#PrincipleNotPolitics #RuleOfLaw #FiduciaryDuty #PublicTrust

1 month ago | [YT] | 39

PeaceKeepers

open.substack.com/pub/lancepeatling/p/one-deceitfu…

4 months ago | [YT] | 33

PeaceKeepers

peacekeepers.org.uk/the-great-myth-of-parliamentar…

4 months ago | [YT] | 61

PeaceKeepers

Summiting - He's gone early
Well if you are going to climb Everest, it's best to set off before the dawn...

lancepeatling.substack.com/p/summiting-hes-gone-ea…

5 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 26

PeaceKeepers

WHEN we reject one narrative, one set
of belief systems, we leave ourselves
wide open to another.
It is only through the application of
rationality premised on evidence that we
may proceed wisely.
At any one moment in time, you see the lie
of a thing and you reject it. You reject that
lie because you know better, but the next
lie you know nothing about.
So recognise what you do not know, and
question everything that presents itself to
you about which you know nothing; do not
shy away from admitting that which you do
not know.
The world is cloaked in tall stories as well
as truth. Telling one from another requires
evidence. It really is that simple - what has
led you to that belief? Can you provide
evidence that it is so?
You only ever need ask one simple question
when you want to understand the truth
or otherwise of a thing (anything else is
conjecture, storytelling, and we all like a
good yarn) – what evidence do you have for
that claim?
Keep in mind that evidence is not someone
else simply saying it is so, no matter how
important an authority they may claim to be
on the subject.
Here are some things for us all to (re)
consider:

1 year ago | [YT] | 66

PeaceKeepers

2 years ago | [YT] | 203

PeaceKeepers

It would seem that there are still people that somehow (or won't) comprehend the simplicity of what this means

2 years ago | [YT] | 215

PeaceKeepers

Who is the true source of authority?

2 years ago | [YT] | 107

PeaceKeepers

2 years ago | [YT] | 67

PeaceKeepers

2 years ago | [YT] | 109