Everytime I ask a question about astrophysics I end up explaining all this to make sence of my question. I'm tired of repeating so I'm posting here. I apologize in advance for all the dam _*words*_ , so many _*WORDS*_. I also thank you for your consideration of these 'matters'.
First you got to be thinking in 4D and you got to remember and I'm claiming we're inside a black hole.
When I say things like "the singularity is the future", and "all futures point towards the singularity" I am literally quoting many astrophysicists much smarter than me, when they talk about what they imagine it would be like once an observer passes an event horizon. Also note these much smarter astrophysicists point out that we would never be able to see in the direction of the singularity because now we are falling at the speed of light. That essentially means we can't see into the future, yes , makes sense so far right? Now remember this is a black hole in a four-dimensional universe that I'm talking about. Once this 4D black hole gets created , everything within experiences that 4th dimension, which is now completely drawn out with no freedom to move in, restricted freedoms, in other directions. By being inside the 4d black hole the fourth dimension takes on the properties that we associate with time. Simple so far, right? Have you heard of frame dragging? The concept that a rotating mass will also drag empty space along with it? & Also that in the ergosphere of a rotating black hole the effect of frame-dragging will let an object that's within the event horizon still escape because relative to at least an outside frame it's traveling faster than light . The object itself is not traveling faster than light in the space it's in, but the space it's in is traveling near light-speed as well and in combination becomes faster than light. Such that things in an ergosphere of a black hole may still escape. That's where you get these people claiming time travel is possible if you just plot the right course, but as far as I know no one's ever done the calculations such that you can get far enough back in time to see any more than yourself going in. (Note, that wouldn't exactly make sense in my hypothesis) So far everything I just said is completely in line with reputable astrophysicists, many things directly quoted. Now some physicists I hear just say things like "well at the singularity everything breaks down and I stopped thinking about it" but others, I've heard claim that in a black hole space itself continues to fall forever, literally that the singularity is rushing away from anything that fell in after the holes creation, just as anything that fell in after is falling away from the event horizon. Not all astrophysicists share this infinite depth point of view, put my hypothesis relies on it and here's where it starts to kick in. Here's where you going to have to start thinking in four dimensions, as well as assume that second group of astrophysicists is correct. Do you know what a Gabriel's horn is? I am imagining something like that where the end of the horn would be the event horizon and the mouthpiece would be the singularity, time is the direction towards the blowhole. Everything in the space inside is constantly shifting towards the blowhole singularity... Space itself is getting framed dragged and everything within frames is traveling at the speed of light towards the direction of singularity. Now You have to imagine each cross-sectional slice of this 4D horn is literally a three-dimensional universe! What we commonly call our light cone on a minkowski diagram would be a hyperbolic shape matching the curve of this Gabriel's horn with the wider horned end facing the event horizon. That would be the past. With me so far? I hope so because here's where I start comparing my idea to the observational evidence. The universe's expansion, As we're 'falling towards the future' the space is also getting frame dragged there is continual acceleration towards the singularity, even though we can't move faster than light in the space in which were embedded the space itself can get dragged and accelerate! In this process we are literally getting spaghettified in time! Since all distances can't be separated from the time it takes to get there, things further away will always be further back in time following this minkowski light cone, but since we're being spaghettified in that temporal direction things will appear to accelerate away from us. We won't be able to perceive this acceleration any other way, any more than we can figure out the one directional speed of light. Now to address dark matter and overdensity, As already pointed out, we can't see the future(as in direction towards the singularity) , but obviously there would have had to have been an overdensity to create this black hole, it's ahead of us in time where we can't see it but it's gravity is affecting the rate of acceleration and time 'now' , we experience the effects of this as dark matter. An important note here is that this completely separates and distinguishes the concepts of entropic time from time as a spacial dimension , the two being caused by completely different things. Spacial time is a symptom of the 4th dimension being limited in is axis of freedom and our speed in it also limiting the axis of freedom of information transfer and interaction.(Because we are in sed hole) While entropic time is the emergent property that arises from the restriction. I believe that if time was literally reversed like we were being shot out of a white hole we would still age the same, entropy would still work the same, either direction, time symmetry. It emerged because of the restriction of freedom of movement in the higher dimension by the nature of its geometry (I claim Gabriel's horn like), being the cause of the perception of time. I think ALL fiction is wrong as if we traveled to the future in my idea, the physical future wouldn't be our entropic future, but would appear like a different but similar universe with a vague resemblance of a dark matter map , as it's a different 3d layer of this 4d Gabriel's horn hyperbolic. From what I have heard mathematicians and astrophysicists say, my hypothesis seems like a natural conclusion to come to. Yes? What I need done mathematically to support my hypothesis. 1) If the the calculations were done regarding the frame dragging of the inside of a 4d black hole the mass of the universe, would the frame dragging related acceleration at a depth corresponding to the age of the universe that represents our current time match up with our current observations of the Hubble constant and its acceleration? Would dark matter observations support the existence of enough over density for the creation of this black hole in the first place?(Keeping in mind it would be denser further in the future, following the hyperbolic curve) Of course how far in the future such Mass would be is an adjustable parameter so it really doesn't _prove_ anything. Also I suspect (now, I admit, I'm _really_ reaching here) in the study of subatomic particles matters of time symmetry violation and the higgs boson , there might be additional supporting evidence. But those things are currently beyond my comprehension. Still open questions , What really is the cause of gravity, yes it needs a concentration of mass and or energy to happen but how is it connected? If our perception of time now is only a emergent property of the restriction of the freedom of movement of that higher dimension, then what governs the interactions between mass, energy and gravity in the higher dimension that spawned the black hole universe in which we reside in the first place? (As that would technically be before time as defined, by anyone) These are just a few of the minor things I think about when I daydream.
Read my, the 11th comment, & my 8 self-replies. Do I sound too much like a Crack-Pot or should I make my own video instead of this AI generated regurgitation I suffered through listening to?
A wall poster that was issued as a promotion for a new show coming out on PBS called Cosmos, back in 1980. Copyright "intergalactic light and power" I got the original at the gift shop at the nuclear reactor at Brookhaven national Labs back when they used to give tours. Not many of this poster was printed.
I would like to get mine operational this spring, if anybody has experience with this aircraft and is willing to help guide and advise me with assembly, maintenance modifications etc, please comment.
Pete Venuti
Pete Venuti
@thethoughtemporiumI think has a good perspective on GMOs. youtube.com/clip/UgkxT9P759HQInmB4cgQlqVwTNu82PCEQ…
4 months ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Pete Venuti
Everytime I ask a question about astrophysics I end up explaining all this to make sence of my question.
I'm tired of repeating so I'm posting here.
I apologize in advance for all the dam _*words*_ , so many _*WORDS*_. I also thank you for your consideration of these 'matters'.
First you got to be thinking in 4D and you got to remember and I'm claiming we're inside a black hole.
When I say things like "the singularity is the future", and "all futures point towards the singularity" I am literally quoting many astrophysicists much smarter than me, when they talk about what they imagine it would be like once an observer passes an event horizon. Also note these much smarter astrophysicists point out that we would never be able to see in the direction of the singularity because now we are falling at the speed of light. That essentially means we can't see into the future, yes , makes sense so far right?
Now remember this is a black hole in a four-dimensional universe that I'm talking about. Once this 4D black hole gets created , everything within experiences that 4th dimension, which is now completely drawn out with no freedom to move in, restricted freedoms, in other directions. By being inside the 4d black hole the fourth dimension takes on the properties that we associate with time. Simple so far, right?
Have you heard of frame dragging? The concept that a rotating mass will also drag empty space along with it? & Also that in the ergosphere of a rotating black hole the effect of frame-dragging will let an object that's within the event horizon still escape because relative to at least an outside frame it's traveling faster than light . The object itself is not traveling faster than light in the space it's in, but the space it's in is traveling near light-speed as well and in combination becomes faster than light. Such that things in an ergosphere of a black hole may still escape. That's where you get these people claiming time travel is possible if you just plot the right course, but as far as I know no one's ever done the calculations such that you can get far enough back in time to see any more than yourself going in. (Note, that wouldn't exactly make sense in my hypothesis)
So far everything I just said is completely in line with reputable astrophysicists, many things directly quoted.
Now some physicists I hear just say things like "well at the singularity everything breaks down and I stopped thinking about it" but others, I've heard claim that in a black hole space itself continues to fall forever, literally that the singularity is rushing away from anything that fell in after the holes creation, just as anything that fell in after is falling away from the event horizon. Not all astrophysicists share this infinite depth point of view, put my hypothesis relies on it and here's where it starts to kick in.
Here's where you going to have to start thinking in four dimensions, as well as assume that second group of astrophysicists is correct.
Do you know what a Gabriel's horn is? I am imagining something like that where the end of the horn would be the event horizon and the mouthpiece would be the singularity, time is the direction towards the blowhole. Everything in the space inside is constantly shifting towards the blowhole singularity... Space itself is getting framed dragged and everything within frames is traveling at the speed of light towards the direction of singularity. Now You have to imagine each cross-sectional slice of this 4D horn is literally a three-dimensional universe! What we commonly call our light cone on a minkowski diagram would be a hyperbolic shape matching the curve of this Gabriel's horn with the wider horned end facing the event horizon. That would be the past.
With me so far? I hope so because here's where I start comparing my idea to the observational evidence.
The universe's expansion,
As we're 'falling towards the future' the space is also getting frame dragged there is continual acceleration towards the singularity, even though we can't move faster than light in the space in which were embedded the space itself can get dragged and accelerate! In this process we are literally getting spaghettified in time!
Since all distances can't be separated from the time it takes to get there, things further away will always be further back in time following this minkowski light cone, but since we're being spaghettified in that temporal direction things will appear to accelerate away from us. We won't be able to perceive this acceleration any other way, any more than we can figure out the one directional speed of light.
Now to address dark matter and overdensity,
As already pointed out, we can't see the future(as in direction towards the singularity) , but obviously there would have had to have been an overdensity to create this black hole, it's ahead of us in time where we can't see it but it's gravity is affecting the rate of acceleration and time 'now' , we experience the effects of this as dark matter.
An important note here is that this completely separates and distinguishes the concepts of entropic time from time as a spacial dimension , the two being caused by completely different things.
Spacial time is a symptom of the 4th dimension being limited in is axis of freedom and our speed in it also limiting the axis of freedom of information transfer and interaction.(Because we are in sed hole) While entropic time is the emergent property that arises from the restriction. I believe that if time was literally reversed like we were being shot out of a white hole we would still age the same, entropy would still work the same, either direction, time symmetry. It emerged because of the restriction of freedom of movement in the higher dimension by the nature of its geometry (I claim Gabriel's horn like), being the cause of the perception of time.
I think ALL fiction is wrong as if we traveled to the future in my idea, the physical future wouldn't be our entropic future, but would appear like a different but similar universe with a vague resemblance of a dark matter map , as it's a different 3d layer of this 4d Gabriel's horn hyperbolic.
From what I have heard mathematicians and astrophysicists say, my hypothesis seems like a natural conclusion to come to. Yes?
What I need done mathematically to support my hypothesis.
1) If the the calculations were done regarding the frame dragging of the inside of a 4d black hole the mass of the universe, would the frame dragging related acceleration at a depth corresponding to the age of the universe that represents our current time match up with our current observations of the Hubble constant and its acceleration?
Would dark matter observations support the existence of enough over density for the creation of this black hole in the first place?(Keeping in mind it would be denser further in the future, following the hyperbolic curve) Of course how far in the future such Mass would be is an adjustable parameter so it really doesn't _prove_ anything.
Also I suspect (now, I admit, I'm _really_ reaching here) in the study of subatomic particles matters of time symmetry violation and the higgs boson , there might be additional supporting evidence. But those things are currently beyond my comprehension.
Still open questions ,
What really is the cause of gravity, yes it needs a concentration of mass and or energy to happen but how is it connected?
If our perception of time now is only a emergent property of the restriction of the freedom of movement of that higher dimension, then what governs the interactions between mass, energy and gravity in the higher dimension that spawned the black hole universe in which we reside in the first place? (As that would technically be before time as defined, by anyone)
These are just a few of the minor things I think about when I daydream.
1 year ago (edited) | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Pete Venuti
Which snake is this?
1 year ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Pete Venuti
Read my, the 11th comment, & my 8 self-replies. Do I sound too much like a Crack-Pot or should I make my own video instead of this AI generated regurgitation I suffered through listening to?
1 year ago | [YT] | 1
View 5 replies
Pete Venuti
A wall poster that was issued as a promotion for a new show coming out on PBS called Cosmos, back in 1980. Copyright "intergalactic light and power"
I got the original at the gift shop at the nuclear reactor at Brookhaven national Labs back when they used to give tours. Not many of this poster was printed.
1 year ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Pete Venuti
I would like to get mine operational this spring, if anybody has experience with this aircraft and is willing to help guide and advise me with assembly, maintenance modifications etc, please comment.
1 year ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Pete Venuti
Let's call this a public service announcement.
2 years ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies