Is @matthew_pridgen intentionally deceiving people for personal or political gain, or has he himself been deceived? God Knows. Both he and Charlie Kirk share the name of Jesus Christ. youtube.com/shorts/jxSSQIF4DQs
@CyberTocsinsGhost , This is exactly what I meant when I wrote how "Such behaviour makes the God they hate so much more evident as well." I know they aren't trying to, but they give me more reason to believe.
@TheLight-Bringer I support people's right to live, and to not be assassinated. You celebrate death, which is in the same spirit as glorifying war. It's easy to see how much you enjoy it. You know what you are, and so do many, many others. What you are doing might make you feel better, but it will not make you be better. You are addicted to your rage, while it soothes and destroys you.
16th of September, 2025 @iridiumkush237 Has decided to take time out of his busy schedule to show me just how highly he values the so-called "golden vagina". One who would claim that another is "jelly" of what they have, or think they have, is saying so with regards to how they themselves value that thing. His jewelry, for example. I have heard him claim that others are jealous of his jewelry, but it is HE who values that jewelry very highly. I do not wear jewelry because it does not appeal to me, and I have no desire for external validation. I would understand if he were a peacock, but he is a grown man who claims to be #MGTOW. He is a PUA, with P.O.B. https://youtu.be/yXtBLebKXlw
I will keep this short and simple: It is not the guns.
The term "Gun Violence" is manipulative, as it is intended to isolate firearms as the common denominator in violent acts. It uses the fact that all "gun violence" includes the use of guns to suggest a certain train of thought regarding violence in general.
Many people already understand this, but I am making this post to simplify the visualization/articulation of the actual data, and expose the mind trick being used to manipulate the mass of normies.
Image 1: Charts sourcing data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, showing a by country comparison of ALL intentional homicide/murder rates to the average of guns owned.
Image 2: Charts that are typically used by gun grabbing politicians, comparing average of guns owned to "Gun violence deaths" by country.
Please share this data (or this post) with everyone who has an interest in fighting for their right to bear arms. When you show people how the magic trick works, it doesn't work on them anymore.
First, it is most important to state that this post is not about race or nationality. My post is about correcting the suggestion that "13%" of the American population committed the crimes shown in image one. It is also very important to note that of the 13% demographic of black Americans in the United States, there is a small percentage (less than 1%) from that demographic who are committing multiple violent crimes. Claiming that it is an entire 13% is a gross overstatement, and implies that every single person in that 13% demographic is participating in the commission of those crimes.
I refuse to include the name of the YouTube channel who created the post featured here, and I doubt that he made this image himself, but I will say this for the benefit of any who may know who he is:
This person is either an accelerator propagandist, or an Agent Provocateur. The only difference being whether or not he is affiliated with any group determined to paint #MGTOW as violent extremists, or if he is simply inclined to violence and acting of his own accord, encouraging others to join him. There is no denying that this is accelerator propaganda, meant to entice people (specifically white people, in the case of his featured post) into responding in a publicly violent manner. He has done so multiple times and it has, in the past, been mostly in the direction of *promoting violence (by men) toward women.
Now this person's post is about directing that animosity **toward an entire racial demographic. One thing that proves this, is that 14 of the 18 pictures/names are those of white American women, which is counter intuitive to his typical pattern. (See Image 1) Further proof is in the fact that nearly half of the victims shown were k*lled by perpetrators other than those of this 13% demographic he mentions. The error in his suggestion and thinking is 44.4%, which is high enough to suggest it is intentional. I could understand if there were a few out of the 18, but there are several. (See Images 2-4)
[Edit: Image 4 should have been Laken Riley's photo in top right. I would like to correct this but, unfortunately, images cannot be edited/changed in @YouTube posts. Perhaps this could be added to community post features.]
There is also his specific wording to notice, saying "We must deal with the problem before..." which creates a call to violence with a sense of urgency and specific direction. Or should I say a deliberate misdirection? Either way this man is not a friend to MGTOW, and he has proven that through multiple comments, trying to shame and belittle the philosophy, and exalt his own. He is a loose cannon, and a liability to any men of MGTOW who associate with him.
*MGTOW men DO NOT condone violence, but advocate for a separation and walking away from usury and societal expectations - be they expectations or usury of women, government, elitists pigs, cvcked normies, etc.
**Calling out an individual for degenerate or violent behaviour is absolutely necessary, but that is much different than labeling an entire race or group of people. Doing so not only encourages others to retaliate in kind, but IT ALSO INCREASES DEMAND TO REINFORCE THE SHIELD BEHIND WHICH THE VIOLENT AND DEGENERATE INDIVIDUALS WOULD HIDE. It is very important that people who use a broad brush understand: If you want specific results, you MUST use a specific approach.
PS. I understand how severe the violence in the United States is becoming, while self-defense along with actual and effective law enforcement is being whittled away. I truly wish there was more that I could do, and I pray earnestly for you all.
[Edit: Image 4 should have been Laken Riley's photo in top right. I would like to correct this but, unfortunately, images cannot be edited/changed in YouTube posts. Perhaps this could be added to community post features.]
I'm just gonna leave this right here for now. Working on a post but I might even make a video. I'm announcing my intention publicly so that I do not put it off or ignore it altogether. Hopefully everyone can understand the context with this one image. This is not to suggest cause-and-effect, but there is definitely a correlation. If that correlation is simply supply and demand, the demand for better mental health is obviously not being met.
29/08/25 I can't say I feel flattered by the imitation. I can't say I feel bothered by it either. I'm not emotionally invested. I do find it interesting to see their persistent effort to provoke the anger and frustration this "person" feels over my previous posts. The consistent reactive (overreactive) behaviour is not unexpected, especially from someone with personality disorders and identity issues.
This is not the only post like this, just the most recent. There have been multiple posts from many accounts, all attempting to do the very same thing. Some of them being posted in the early morning hours and in the middle of the night. If I cared to feel anything at all about this it would be pity, knowing that I'm likely on their mind before they fall asleep, while they sleep, and when they wake, day after day. THE OBSESSION IS REAL ! 🙂 #RentFree
Out Of The Blue
Out Of The Blue
🌬 Are you the North Wind?
🌞 Are you the sun?
youtube.com/clip/Ugkxml6TBWHd4ZvMywDGDWtUqJ_rLMU-W…
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 33
View 0 replies
Out Of The Blue
Is @matthew_pridgen intentionally deceiving people for personal or political gain, or has he himself been deceived?
God Knows.
Both he and Charlie Kirk share the name of Jesus Christ.
youtube.com/shorts/jxSSQIF4DQs
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 29
View 0 replies
Out Of The Blue
@CyberTocsinsGhost , This is exactly what I meant when I wrote how "Such behaviour makes the God they hate so much more evident as well." I know they aren't trying to, but they give me more reason to believe.
@TheLight-Bringer I support people's right to live, and to not be assassinated. You celebrate death, which is in the same spirit as glorifying war. It's easy to see how much you enjoy it.
You know what you are, and so do many, many others. What you are doing might make you feel better, but it will not make you be better. You are addicted to your rage, while it soothes and destroys you.
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 38
View 9 replies
Out Of The Blue
youtube.com/shorts/IadzchBWZbo
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 30
View 6 replies
Out Of The Blue
16th of September, 2025
@iridiumkush237 Has decided to take time out of his busy schedule to show me just how highly he values the so-called "golden vagina". One who would claim that another is "jelly" of what they have, or think they have, is saying so with regards to how they themselves value that thing. His jewelry, for example. I have heard him claim that others are jealous of his jewelry, but it is HE who values that jewelry very highly.
I do not wear jewelry because it does not appeal to me, and I have no desire for external validation. I would understand if he were a peacock, but he is a grown man who claims to be #MGTOW. He is a PUA, with P.O.B.
https://youtu.be/yXtBLebKXlw
4 weeks ago | [YT] | 56
View 10 replies
Out Of The Blue
I will keep this short and simple:
It is not the guns.
The term "Gun Violence" is manipulative, as it is intended to isolate firearms as the common denominator in violent acts.
It uses the fact that all "gun violence" includes the use of guns to suggest a certain train of thought regarding violence in general.
Many people already understand this, but I am making this post to simplify the visualization/articulation of the actual data, and expose the mind trick being used to manipulate the mass of normies.
Image 1: Charts sourcing data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, showing a by country comparison of ALL intentional homicide/murder rates to the average of guns owned.
Image 2: Charts that are typically used by gun grabbing politicians, comparing average of guns owned to "Gun violence deaths" by country.
Please share this data (or this post) with everyone who has an interest in fighting for their right to bear arms.
When you show people how the magic trick works, it doesn't work on them anymore.
@heavydutycountry
@LiberalHivemind
@ColionNoir
@SecondAmendmentFoundation
@SargonofAkkad
@Memology101
@SaltyCracker
@turningpointusa
@DeVoryDarkins
@BlackConservativePerspective
@AnthonyBrianLogan
@LangleyOutdoors
@RealCharlieKirk
@LFRFAMILY
@LFRJOJO
@TheOfficialCartierFamily
@TimcastIRL
@ActualJusticeWarrior
@wearechange
@BrandonTrueblood11
@BillyVonBomb
@MRADefeat
@ONEFASTDAK2
@MGTOWOutlaw3888
@rustyrivers7118
@CyberTocsinsGhost
@Chaosforyou728
@Gonewithjon
@CharAznable0093
@Frost-iceDemon
@DrGingerHamster
@HAMMERHANDX
@redpillinthewind
@stonereaper1157
@MGTOWPhoenix
@undeadchronicxvii
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 37
View 2 replies
Out Of The Blue
10th of September, 2025
First, it is most important to state that this post is not about race or nationality. My post is about correcting the suggestion that "13%" of the American population committed the crimes shown in image one. It is also very important to note that of the 13% demographic of black Americans in the United States, there is a small percentage (less than 1%) from that demographic who are committing multiple violent crimes. Claiming that it is an entire 13% is a gross overstatement, and implies that every single person in that 13% demographic is participating in the commission of those crimes.
I refuse to include the name of the YouTube channel who created the post featured here, and I doubt that he made this image himself, but I will say this for the benefit of any who may know who he is:
This person is either an accelerator propagandist, or an Agent Provocateur. The only difference being whether or not he is affiliated with any group determined to paint #MGTOW as violent extremists, or if he is simply inclined to violence and acting of his own accord, encouraging others to join him.
There is no denying that this is accelerator propaganda, meant to entice people (specifically white people, in the case of his featured post) into responding in a publicly violent manner. He has done so multiple times and it has, in the past, been mostly in the direction of *promoting violence (by men) toward women.
Now this person's post is about directing that animosity **toward an entire racial demographic.
One thing that proves this, is that 14 of the 18 pictures/names are those of white American women, which is counter intuitive to his typical pattern.
(See Image 1)
Further proof is in the fact that nearly half of the victims shown were k*lled by perpetrators other than those of this 13% demographic he mentions. The error in his suggestion and thinking is 44.4%, which is high enough to suggest it is intentional. I could understand if there were a few out of the 18, but there are several.
(See Images 2-4)
[Edit: Image 4 should have been Laken Riley's photo in top right. I would like to correct this but, unfortunately, images cannot be edited/changed in @YouTube posts. Perhaps this could be added to community post features.]
There is also his specific wording to notice, saying
"We must deal with the problem before..."
which creates a call to violence with a sense of urgency and specific direction. Or should I say a deliberate misdirection? Either way this man is not a friend to MGTOW, and he has proven that through multiple comments, trying to shame and belittle the philosophy, and exalt his own. He is a loose cannon, and a liability to any men of MGTOW who associate with him.
*MGTOW men DO NOT condone violence, but advocate for a separation and walking away from usury and societal expectations - be they expectations or usury of women, government, elitists pigs, cvcked normies, etc.
**Calling out an individual for degenerate or violent behaviour is absolutely necessary, but that is much different than labeling an entire race or group of people. Doing so not only encourages others to retaliate in kind, but IT ALSO INCREASES DEMAND TO REINFORCE THE SHIELD BEHIND WHICH THE VIOLENT AND DEGENERATE INDIVIDUALS WOULD HIDE.
It is very important that people who use a broad brush understand: If you want specific results, you MUST use a specific approach.
PS. I understand how severe the violence in the United States is becoming, while self-defense along with actual and effective law enforcement is being whittled away.
I truly wish there was more that I could do, and I pray earnestly for you all.
[Edit: Image 4 should have been Laken Riley's photo in top right. I would like to correct this but, unfortunately, images cannot be edited/changed in YouTube posts. Perhaps this could be added to community post features.]
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 32
View 3 replies
Out Of The Blue
Lol! This cheeky bird. Shout out to Allen. Run while you still can, mate. youtube.com/shorts/0-CKIJRx4Ec
1 month ago | [YT] | 18
View 4 replies
Out Of The Blue
I'm just gonna leave this right here for now.
Working on a post but I might even make a video.
I'm announcing my intention publicly so that I do not put it off or ignore it altogether. Hopefully everyone can understand the context with this one image. This is not to suggest cause-and-effect, but there is definitely a correlation. If that correlation is simply supply and demand, the demand for better mental health is obviously not being met.
1 month ago | [YT] | 26
View 3 replies
Out Of The Blue
29/08/25
I can't say I feel flattered by the imitation.
I can't say I feel bothered by it either.
I'm not emotionally invested.
I do find it interesting to see their persistent effort to provoke the anger and frustration this "person" feels over my previous posts. The consistent reactive (overreactive) behaviour is not unexpected, especially from someone with personality disorders and identity issues.
This is not the only post like this, just the most recent. There have been multiple posts from many accounts, all attempting to do the very same thing. Some of them being posted in the early morning hours and in the middle of the night. If I cared to feel anything at all about this it would be pity, knowing that I'm likely on their mind before they fall asleep, while they sleep, and when they wake, day after day.
THE OBSESSION IS REAL !
🙂 #RentFree
1 month ago | [YT] | 30
View 1 reply
Load more