Auditing Reno 911

Coming soon....

1 day ago | [YT] | 58

Auditing Reno 911

I found some friends that came to the library meeting...

1 week ago | [YT] | 91

Auditing Reno 911

Senator Edgar Flores arrested for DUI. Bodycam youtube.com/live/_VWsDDrYURE?si=XLQCVNqWK2zsbH20

1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 44

Auditing Reno 911

Attorney Alison Kertis with Sierra Crest Law lies about me. Here's proof another lying attorney. https://youtu.be/NO-Gcto3LRU

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 12

Auditing Reno 911

This is the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk. 22 year old Tyler Robinson.

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 52

Auditing Reno 911

I am running for Nevada Assembly. Our Center Reno a 501C3 NON PROFIT put me on a BANNED LIST for a PRIDE event on a public street. The law says "501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign." https://youtu.be/M7h8Fpo9TT0

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 38

Auditing Reno 911

Notice of intent to sue sent to Reno City Attorney Karl Hall here's the video. https://youtu.be/M7h8Fpo9TT0

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 94

Auditing Reno 911

City of Reno Government employee conspires with Our Center to block FREE SPEECH at pride events.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 59

Auditing Reno 911

If you need very aggressive private security in Nevada call these guys... video coming soon.

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 67

Auditing Reno 911

Carson City District Attorney Garrit Pruty and Deputy Reese,

Thank you both for taking time to talk with me. Mr. Reese I am almost ready to publish our conversation and as promised I ran all of the public records requests I have for Carson City through multiple AI and had them examined for legal compliance and compare the answers Carson City gave against the appropriate case law... Here is what Chat GPT, Gemini and Grok came up with. Please provide public records instead of having a pattern and practice of denial and hiding government actions from the public.

As a journalist and candidate for public office committed to open government, I write to formally express concern over what has become a clear and troubling pattern of systemic noncompliance with the Nevada Public Records Act (NPRA, NRS Chapter 239) by Carson City.
Across more than three years of public records requests, your office has repeatedly delayed responses, issued overbroad denials, withheld entire documents rather than redacting, and failed to assist in narrowing requests—each of which stands in direct violation of Nevada law. These failures obstruct not only public oversight but also journalism and lawful civic inquiry. The issues are particularly concerning amid my ongoing federal civil rights lawsuit against Carson City (Ribar v. Carson City et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-00103-ART-CLB), which underscores the public interest in these disclosures.
Legal Framework
Nevada law requires:
Timely responses within five business days (NRS 239.0107);
Assistance in narrowing broad requests (NRS 239.0107(1)(d));
Redactions over blanket denials (NRS 239.010(2));
Agencies to carry the burden of justifying any withholding (NRS 239.0113);
Minimal redactions and disclosure wherever feasible (DR Partners, 118 Nev. 693; LVRJ v. LVMPD, 139 Nev. Adv. Op. 41 (2023)).
Where body camera footage is concerned, NRS 289.830 permits “per incident” limitations, but also obligates agencies to assist in refining such requests rather than denying them outright (Conrad v. Reno PD, 139 Nev. Adv. Op. 13 (2023)). And delays of nearly 20 months, as seen in several of my requests, constitute constructive denials under NRS 239.0107(2).
These requirements are not optional, and failure to uphold them damages public confidence in government integrity—particularly when the records at issue relate to potential misconduct by law enforcement.
Summary of Key Records Handling Failures
Below is a request-by-request summary of outstanding issues, each grounded in Nevada statutory and case law:
August 30, 2022 – Tow Citations & Body Cam (CC0134671)
Violation: No citations provided after 3 years. No assistance in refining body cam request.
Statutes Violated: NRS 239.0107(1)(d); Reno Newspapers diligence requirement.
Action Requested: Provide citations and assist in refining video access.
August 31, 2022 – Personnel Records for CCSO Case #22-5359
Violation: Blanket denial without offering redacted records.
Statutes Violated: NRS 239.010(2); DR Partners; Donrey v. Bradshaw, 106 Nev. 630.
Action Requested: Provide redacted versions of responsive records.
January 26, 2024 – Body Cam for Deputy Bueno (Aug 30–Sep 11, 2022)
Violation: Denial issued with no assistance to identify relevant incidents.
Statutes Violated: NRS 239.0107(1)(d); Conrad v. Reno PD.
Action Requested: Assist in refining and produce footage.
January 26, 2024 – Sheriff’s Office Policies
Violation: Nearly 20 months of delay. No justification provided. Fee discussion improper.
Statutes Violated: NRS 239.0107; NRS 239.052; Donrey.
Action Requested: Provide policies in digital format without fees.
February 1, 2024 – Lobby Camera Footage
Violation: Delay continues, redactions not delivered.
Statutes Violated: NRS 239.0107(2); LVRJ v. LVMPD.
Action Requested: Provide redacted video or written explanation.
February 7, 2024 – Lobby Footage & DA Communications
Violation: Video remains outstanding; denial of documents lacks log.
Statutes Violated: Reno Newspapers (lack of privilege log).
Action Requested: Provide redacted video and a privilege log.
March 21, 2024 – Sgt. ID and Lobby Video (Mar 20)
Violation: No response on video or officer identity after over 17 months.
Statutes Violated: NRS 239.0107; Donrey (employee ID not exempt).
Action Requested: Provide name, badge number, and redacted video.
May 3, 2024 – Deputy Bueno Camera Activations (Aug 2022–May 2024)
Violation: No response; no effort to assist in refining.
Statutes Violated: Conrad; NRS 239.0107(1)(d).
Action Requested: Assist and provide activation logs or footage.
July & December 2024 – All Records Requests from Past Two Years
Violation: Partial log provided; documents still withheld.
Statutes Violated: NRS 239.0107; Reno Newspapers.
Action Requested: Provide full responses and records.
December 4, 2024 – Body Cam (Dec 3, 2024)
Violation: Denial issued without redaction despite feasibility. On-site viewing only is insufficient.
Statutes Violated: DR Partners; LVRJ v. LVMPD.
Action Requested: Provide redacted footage; explain any complete withholdings in detail.
Broader Public Interest
These requests—especially those concerning Deputy Jason Bueno, who is named in public complaints—go to the heart of law enforcement accountability. The public has a right to know how its institutions respond to allegations, manage policy transparency, and treat those who seek lawful oversight. The recent ACLU of Nevada v. Clark County School District transparency case involving CCSD body cameras (ongoing, with 2025 settlement) only reinforces that this issue is not isolated—it is systemic.
Closing Request
To restore trust and fulfill your obligations under state law, I respectfully request:
Full disclosure or properly redacted records in digital format;
Assistance in refining outstanding requests where applicable;
A written privilege log for any withheld documents, as required under Reno Newspapers v. Gibbons.
These are not adversarial demands—they are the minimum requirements of Nevada law. I hope that Carson City will take this opportunity to realign its records practices with the values of transparency, accountability, and service to the public. Please respond with compliance within five business days, or I will pursue judicial remedies under NRS 239.011, including costs and fees, and share this letter with media outlets.
Respectfully,
Drew J. Ribar
Auditing Reno 911
Candidate for Nevada Assembly, District 40

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 66