The Ameri’can

Nigga is the B.A.E Form of Nig**r

In BAE, the “ER” at the words are exchanged for a “Ah” sound. It is called Non-rhoticity in linguistics and that refers to the omission or weakening of the /r/ sound after a vowel esp at the end of a syllable or word.

Hence words like Brother, Mother, Father, Sister, Trigger, Pillar, water, etc becomes Brotha, Motha, Fatha, Sista, Trigga, Pilla, wata,

American Southern English doesn’t feature this and BAE IS NOT a derivative of ASE which tends to be very rhotic

Something else funny we do is shorten words: Brotha = bro, sister = sis, cousin = cus, Family = Fam, uncle = unc etc it’s a hallmark of our form of English that others have appropriated

Nigga is quite literally a Black American word and everyone else who’s saying it is simply emulating Black Americans.

African, Caribbean, and other groups (regardless of phenotypical conflation or not) shouldn’t say it. They came into contact with it via media from Black America.

It is not within their cultural memory and their usage is emblematic of a sort of disrespect and disregard they have for Black American culture in general which is why the delineation movements are going to simply continue to snowball.


Different culture
Different society
Different people

These differences should be respected

Nigg*r (and Nigga) shares the same root word (las Niger (Niger) but contextually they are completely different linguistic terms.

Nigeria (Land of the Niger) and Niger both get their names from the River “Niger”

Nigeria and Niger are toponyms derived from a river, while niger as a Latin adjective lives in an entirely different semantic lane.

The River Niger’s name comes from Indigenous and trans-Saharan terms for ‘great river,’ later Latinized by Europeans not from Latin racial descriptors.

The most convincing linguistic origin for “Niger” comes from Berber and Mandé language roots, often reconstructed as something close to gher n-gheren, egerew n-igerewen, or similar forms meaning “river of rivers” or “great flowing river.”

Europeans encountering the term through intermediaries simplified and Latinized it into Niger, because that fit their spelling conventions.

Another competing explanation ties it to Tuareg terms where gher or iger relates to flowing water. Again, Europeans heard a word, approximated it phonetically, and wrote it in a form that made sense to them not because it meant “black,” but because it looked familiar in Latin script.

9 months ago | [YT] | 2

The Ameri’can

The Black Atlantic Framework Summary


The Black Atlantic identity in Britain was created when Caribbean migrants adapted Black American political thought (Malcolm X, the Panthers, SNCC) into a British context and used the term “Black” as a political coalition for all nonwhite groups including Africans and South Asians. It was never a heritage identity.

This produced a British “Black” identity fundamentally different from the American one.

Because this framework views “Black” as a diasporic umbrella, it incorrectly tries to place Black Americans inside the same model despite the fact that Black Americans are not a diaspora population. Black Americans did not migrate from a homeland; they originated in North America as a creolized people and later became the primary cultural and ideological source of modern “Black” politics worldwide.

In short:
Black Americans are not an offshoot of a diaspora as they are the cultural engine that the diaspora borrowed from. The British “Black Atlantic” model fits Caribbean and African immigrants, not Black Americans.

10 months ago | [YT] | 2

The Ameri’can

A Barrel of Oranges 🍊

Imagine you run a juice company and you’re buying Oranges from another salesman. You place an order for a 1,000 barrel of Oranges. The Orange Salesman agrees and the next day you arrive to pick up your barrel of oranges.

Before you shake hands and leave you decide to inspect one of the barrels. Upon reaching into the barrel to inspect it, you pull out a tangerine. You point this out to the salesmen and their response is “oh sorry about that but a few must have gotten caught up in the barreling process.”

Upon reaching into it again, you pull out a mandarin. You point this out to him and their response is “it shouldn’t matter, they all look alike with a similar taste.”

The salesman insists that despite finding a few tangerines and a few mandarins that the barrel is mostly oranges.

The problem is your factory juicers cannot distinguish between each the three and would inevitably mix it all together once a barrel is processed.

If you have integrity, you know this ruins your business model because you need 100% orange juice to sell. If you don’t have integrity, then you’ll sell it as 100% orange juice because you believe the buyers wouldn’t care or notice the difference.

You come to a conclusion with the seller.

Relabel the barrel as a barrel of Fruit and lower the price since the integrity of the barrel is compromised and there’s no way to know the composition of each barrel.

You both shake hands and make this deal.

When you get back to your factory, you realize that some of the oranges were really bigger tangerines being labeled oranges, and that only a few oranges were in the inspected barrel. You also realize that there were not just mandarins but also there were grapefruits being labeled mandarins in there. You discover that the 1000 barrels of oranges you purchased must all contain a mixture of tangerines, oranges, mandarins, and a few grapefruits.

Your production process cannot separate them and once processed the result will be a blended juice.

You now face a choice

Label the product accurately as Mixed Citrus Juice to reflect what it truly contains even if it challenges expectations and affects your business.

or

Continue labeling it as 100% Orange Juice to maintain consistency, protect your brand, and avoid confusion, even though you know it isn’t entirely accurate.

What do you do?

11 months ago | [YT] | 0

The Ameri’can

Rebranding the channel

1 year ago | [YT] | 0

The Ameri’can

We are Playing with Lightning. War in the Modern Age is Information

In the modern world, war is no longer confined to trenches, tanks, or even drones.
War is waged in fiber optics and across server farms.
It’s encrypted. Disguised. Streamed.
It isn’t dropped from planes it’s dropped into timelines.

This is digital warfare.
A war of information.

Ideas are weaponized.
Narratives are loaded.
And truth?
Truth is collateral damage.

Misinformation is a tactic.
An intentional detonation in the mind.
A precision strike on collective memory.
And when the smoke clears, no one remembers how it started

Only who they were told to blame.

Intelligence networks stretch across the globe like spiderwebs

Snaring people, movements, governments.
Feeding governments half-truths, quarter-truths, weaponized truths.

And as the data flows, so does the blood.

So we have to ask

what happens when someone starts playing with this lightning? What is the limits ?

What happens when someone touches it not to illuminate, But to burn?

Imagine a Sudanese nationalist with real political power

Finding himself the true heir to Ta-Wy, and Ta-SETI
Deciding it’s time to take back Kemet?

Not just land.
But narrative.
Memory.
Identity.

And he doesn’t send troops at first
He sends historians.
Influencers.
Documentarians.

He seeds the idea:
Kemet was never lost. Only stolen.
And we are the ones to reclaim it.

Suddenly, borders shift in the mind before they shift on maps.

Suddenly, war becomes not just about tanks or treaties
But hashtags, archives, real Images of statues not to mention AI
And the will to believe and use facts to validate the claim and concept

Because the most dangerous war isn’t the one you see coming

It’s the one that rewrites the past to justify the future Like we’ve seen in so many past cases Or in some cases it’s the one that aligns history into its proper context the information that’s fact that’s being obfuscated as disinformation

Information and disinformation is like clouds and lightening but it’s not content that matters anymore but CONTEXT

And in a world of digital warfare,
Playing with lightning might just start a fire
That consumes the globe.

1 year ago | [YT] | 3

The Ameri’can

Remember, their memories . They were of blood and flesh not paper and ink. Their hearts beat they breathe they had their hopes and dreams

Remember them

1 year ago | [YT] | 1

The Ameri’can

She would say “I ain’t come from no Africa. I came from right here from this land.”

I would laugh and think how ignorant and anti-African and anti-Black she was.

Now I see.


Indios: Negroes de Terra Part 2 coming soon!

1 year ago | [YT] | 2

The Ameri’can

From Indios to Negro

1 year ago | [YT] | 1