Learn B4 You convert to Islam

New song just dropped: "To Be an Ex-Muslim"
This one is raw, personal, and dangerous.
Inspired by Dax’s “To Be a Man” — this song is for anyone who’s lost everything just for asking, “What if they’re wrong?”

🧠 Religion isn’t off-limits.
🔥 Truth shouldn’t cost your identity.
🗣️ Let the world hear our voices.

▶️ Full video out now — https://youtu.be/AP4-NmPQ96o

6 months ago | [YT] | 30

Learn B4 You convert to Islam

The strange thing is that women (whom apparently are lacking in reason) are always the ones required to be modest and decent so as not to arouse the desire of men (the ones that have apparently perfect intellect) .. Isn’t it worthy of someone who claims perfect reason not to be aroused like animals!

7 months ago | [YT] | 6

Learn B4 You convert to Islam

Uthman Burned the Qur’an’s Variants—Here Are 5 Questions to Wreck Your Autopilot

Intro:

Picture this: Uthman, the third caliph, orders every variant copy of the Qur’an torched to create one “perfect” version (Sahih al-Bukhari 6.61.510). Sounds like a tidy fix, right? But dig deeper, and this move cracks the foundation of Islam’s claim to a divinely preserved text. These five questions will make you rethink the story they fed you.

Blunt Verdict:

Uthman’s bonfire didn’t save the Qur’an’s purity—it exposed its fragility.

Five Questions to Chew On:





Why destroy valid recitations? If the Qur’an’s variants—like Ibn Mas’ud’s codex—were divinely revealed, why did Uthman burn them instead of preserving their diversity? Doesn’t torching God’s word sound more like censorship than protection?



Who gave Uthman the right? The Qur’an claims to be guarded by Allah (Surah 15:9). So why did a human caliph decide which version was “correct”? Was Uthman playing God, or was the Qur’an not as protected as claimed?



What was lost in the flames? Companions like Ibn Mas’ud and Ubayy ibn Ka’b had their own codices with different readings. If these were authentic, what divine insights went up in smoke? How do we know the “final” Qur’an isn’t missing something critical?



Why the rush to standardize? If the Qur’an was perfectly memorized, as apologists claim, why the panic to unify texts? Doesn’t the need for standardization scream human error in transmission, not divine perfection?



Can a burned text be “preserved”? If Allah’s word is eternal, how do you square that with Uthman destroying entire mushafs? If variants were “just dialects,” why did companions fight bitterly over their loss?

Preempting Defenses:





“It was just for unity!” Unity doesn’t justify burning divine revelations. If variants were harmless, why not keep them? The fire smells like control, not clarity.



“Oral tradition saved it!” Then why bother with written codices at all? Companions’ disputes (e.g., Ibn Mas’ud’s rejection of Uthman’s version) prove oral memory wasn’t flawless.



“You’re attacking Islam!” Nah, I’m attacking bad logic. Questioning a historical act isn’t hate—it’s holding a divine claim to the fire of reason.

Final Punch:

Uthman’s burning didn’t preserve the Qur’an—it proved it’s a human project, patched together with politics and power. If God’s word needs a bonfire to stay “pure,” maybe it’s not so divine after all.

CTA:

Which question hit you hardest? Drop your thoughts below, share this to rattle some cages, or follow for more truth bombs.

Sources:





Sahih al-Bukhari 6.61.510: Sunnah.com



Qur’an, Surah 15:9: Quran.com



Historical context: F.E. Peters, The Voice, the Word, the Books

7 months ago | [YT] | 6

Learn B4 You convert to Islam

Someone asked “What does Muslim mean?” and leaned on Quran 2:256—“No compulsion in religion”—to argue for freedom in Islam, like with hijab.

Let’s break that down and challenge your understanding of Islam with some hard truths to make you think deeply about what you’re signing up for. You say you follow the Quran and Sunnah, avoiding sects, shirk, and bid’ah, but the layers of contradiction, compulsion, and control in Islam might make you reconsider what “submission” really means.

A Muslim submits to Allah’s will, following the Quran and Prophet Muhammad’s example (Quran 3:19, “The religion before Allah is Islam”). But submission isn’t just praying and fasting—it’s total surrender, often without rational thinking. Quran 5:101 warns, “Do not ask about things which, if made clear to you, may distress you,” and Sahih al-Bukhari 1.2.49 (compiled by Imam Muhammad al-Bukhari, 9th-century scholar) shows the Prophet discouraging dissent. Classical scholars like Al-Tabari (9th-century historian) and Ibn Kathir (14th-century scholar) agree Quran 2:256 applies to entering Islam, not living it—once you’re in, you’re compelled to obey blindly. That means accepting stoning for adultery (Sahih Muslim 17.4206) or unscientific claims like the sun prostrating under Allah’s throne (Sahih al-Bukhari 4.54.421), even when they clash with modern ethics (UN Convention Against Torture, 1984) or reason. Are you ready to shut off your critical thinking entirely?

Islam’s history undercuts the “no compulsion” claim further. Early expansion was built on coercion—submit, pay jizya, or die. Quran 9:29 commands fighting “People of the Book” until they pay jizya “in submission.” Jizya was protection money—pay Muslims to be protected from Muslims. The Banu Qurayza in 627 CE Medina faced this: after their siege, they surrendered, and Sa’d ibn Mu’adh judged their men be killed, women and children enslaved (Ibn Hisham, Sirah Rasul Allah, 8th century). Some scholars like Fred Donner (Muhammad and the Believers, 2010) question the massacre’s scale, but the pattern of coercion is clear—Umayyad and Abbasid caliphs enforced jizya with violence (Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2023). “No compulsion” rings hollow when the choice is convert, pay, or die.

Being a Muslim, by your Quran-and-Sunnah standard, gets more controlling. Quran 5:51 forbids close ties with Jews and Christians—Al-Tabari says no deep friendships. Ibn Taymiyyah (14th-century scholar) insists Muslims shouldn’t live in non-Muslim lands unless to spread Islam (Majmu‘ al-Fatawa). Sharia rules, per Al-Mawardi (11th-century jurist), ban non-Muslims from dressing better than Muslims, riding horses, or walking in the road’s center (Al-Ahkam as-Sultaniyyah). You’re okay enforcing that? And if your wife works with a man, some scholars (Sunan Abu Dawud 2155) say she must breastfeed him five times to become “mahram”—a bizarre rule from Aisha’s narrations. Picture your mother, sister, wife in that office—does that sit right with you?

Your Quran isn’t even one text—Uthman burned variant mushafs (Sahih al-Bukhari 6.61.510), yet Hafs and Warsh readings differ (Surah 2:259, Islamweb). Bukhari kept only 6% of hadith he collected (Al-Tarikh al-Kabir), and Ibn Hisham’s Sira admits he scrubbed Muhammad’s darker deeds—like raiding caravans (Ibn Hisham, Sirah), marrying 6-year-old Aisha (Sahih al-Bukhari 7.62.88), and owning slaves (Quran 4:24). This “clean” version is what you follow—what was in the original?

On hijab, you’re right—forcing it, like in Iran, is wrong (Amnesty International, 2023). But Quran 24:31 and 33:59 command women to cover, and Hadith (Sahih Muslim 4.645) show Aisha veiling fully. Men must lower their gaze (Quran 24:30), but women bear the bigger burden. If a woman doesn’t cover, scholars like Al-Qurtubi (13th century) call it a sin. Is that real freedom, or veiled compulsion?

Being a Muslim, Sadique, means submitting to rules demanding blind obedience, social isolation, and control—often in ways that defy logic or fairness. You say your name means truth, but are you facing these truths about Islam? Life’s too short to follow without thinking.

8 months ago | [YT] | 9

Learn B4 You convert to Islam

What do you think is prohibited in Islam from source of the Quran?

8 months ago | [YT] | 7

Learn B4 You convert to Islam

Do you think Islam is a solution for world peace as "they" claim?

8 months ago | [YT] | 4

Learn B4 You convert to Islam

Holy Shit Moment! 🤔

Islam's greatest hits of contradictions:
• Can't shake hands with women (too tempting!)
• BUT adult breastfeeding is totally cool to become 'mahram'

Let's keep it real: This comes from the authentic hadith about Salim and Sahla (Sahih Muslim 1453). When a grown man needed to enter a woman's house, the Prophet's solution wasn't "maybe don't sexualize every interaction?" Instead, it was "hey, try adult breastfeeding!"

Manuscript receipts don't lie - this isn't some weak hadith. It's in the most authentic collections. 🧾

What do you think is more inappropriate:
A) A professional handshake
B) Adult breastfeeding to make things "halal"

Drop your thoughts below! 👇 And remember - Learn Before You Convert!

#IslamicLogic #CriticalThinking #LearnBeforeYouConvert

1 year ago | [YT] | 3

Learn B4 You convert to Islam

When analyzing Qur'an 5:101 alongside other similar verses and teachings, it becomes evident that the underlying message aligns with the principle of unquestioning obedience. This verse, in particular, warns believers against asking questions that might lead to complications or discomfort, effectively discouraging intellectual probing into matters of faith. Let us expand on how this contributes to the overarching theme of "don't use your brain, just obey."
---
Qur'an 5:101 in Context
The verse reads:
"O you who have believed, do not ask about things which, if they are shown to you, will distress you. But if you ask about them while the Qur'an is being revealed, they will be shown to you. Allah has pardoned that which is past; and Allah is Forgiving and Forbearing."
1. Core Message:
Believers are explicitly discouraged from asking questions that could lead to "distress." This implies that there are areas of knowledge that are better left unexplored, reinforcing the idea that blind faith is preferred over intellectual curiosity.
2. Psychological Influence:
By linking potential distress to questioning, the verse creates a deterrent mechanism where believers might avoid probing issues out of fear of divine reprimand or spiritual harm.
3. Obedience over Inquiry:
The statement that Allah has "pardoned" what is past suggests a forgiving stance for past mistakes but implicitly warns against future inquiries. This conditions the audience to prioritize compliance over reasoning.
---
Parallels in Other Verses and Teachings
1. Obedience Without Question:
Verses like 33:36 ("...they should have no option in their decision") and 4:59 ("Obey Allah and obey the Messenger") consistently emphasize that divine and prophetic authority overrides personal judgment. Together with 5:101, this establishes a pattern where critical thinking or questioning is discouraged in favor of submission.
2. Avoiding Debate:
6:68 ("Turn away from them until they enter into another topic") shows a strategy of avoiding engagement with critical or dissenting views about the Qur'an. This further reinforces a worldview where questioning is seen as unnecessary, even harmful.
3. Warnings Against Excessive Questions:
The hadith where the Prophet disapproves of "too many questions" aligns with 5:101 in creating a culture where curiosity is controlled, and inquiries that may challenge the faith's structure are discouraged.
---
Logical Examination
1. Discouragement of Intellectual Growth:
Discouraging questions that lead to "distress" or complexity prevents believers from fully understanding their faith, leaving many issues unexplored. This suppression of inquiry could lead to dogmatic thinking, where beliefs are held without critical evaluation.
2. Appeal to Authority:
The reliance on Allah and the Prophet as the ultimate authorities creates a closed system of thought. Questions are deemed unnecessary because the answers are presumed to already exist within the revealed texts, creating a circular reasoning fallacy.
3. Fear-Based Deterrence:
Associating questions with potential distress could lead to intellectual paralysis, where individuals are reluctant to explore ideas that may challenge or expand their understanding of faith. This is a form of emotional manipulation, as fear becomes the tool to ensure obedience.
---
Broader Implications: "Don't Use Your Brain, Just Obey"
When viewed in the context of verses like 5:101 and related teachings, the statement "don't use your brain, just obey" becomes a fitting summary of the Qur'anic stance on intellectual inquiry in certain domains. The text does not outright reject the use of reason (as it occasionally encourages reflection), but it does impose strict boundaries on the scope of permissible questioning, particularly in matters of faith and revelation.
This approach:
Prioritizes obedience over intellectual engagement.
Reinforces the authority of divine and prophetic commands.
Discourages curiosity that might lead to doubts or "distress."
While this may foster unity and prevent divisive interpretations among followers, it simultaneously stifles critical thinking and exploration, creating a rigid framework where intellectual growth is limited to predefined boundaries.
---
Conclusion
Qur'an 5:101, in conjunction with similar verses and teachings, strongly supports the idea of compliance over contemplation. The consistent discouragement of questioning, avoidance of dissent, and emphasis on obedience form a coherent narrative: believers are instructed not to engage in critical analysis but to submit unquestioningly to divine authority. This framework aligns with the interpretation, "Don't use your brain, just obey," as it systematically limits intellectual freedom to preserve the structure of faith.

1 year ago | [YT] | 2

Learn B4 You convert to Islam

Let's Get Real About The Pre-Prophet Days 💼

Picture this: A guy in his twenties, working for his sugar mama (yeah, I said it). Before the whole "divine revelation" business kicked off, Muhammad was basically running errands for his wealthy boss-turned-wife, Khadija. And let's be real - he was BROKE before this gig.

Fun fact: This dude was so financially dependent that he couldn't even get approved for marriage by some families. His own uncle straight-up rejected him as a potential son-in-law with the classic Arabic burn "الكريم للكريم" (meaning: the noble is for the noble). Ouch! 🔥

But wait, it gets better...

The "Prophet-able" Business Model 🤑

Now here's where things get spicy. After claiming prophethood, our man's financial portfolio did a complete 180. We're talking about the most dramatic career change in history. Let's break down this incredible transformation:

Before Prophet-hood:
- Working that 9-5 caravan life
- One wife (who was his boss)
- Couldn't get other marriage proposals
- Living on someone else's dime
- Regular degular merchant vibes

After Prophet-hood:
- CEO of his own religion
- Multiple wives (special divine permission, how convenient!)
- People literally giving him their daughters
- Access to war spoils
- Collecting taxes (sorry, I mean "zakat")
- Living that prophet life™️

The Ultimate Side Hustle Gone Viral 📈

Here's the tea: This might be the most successful career pivot in history. My man went from being rejected for marriage to having a divine revelation that conveniently allowed him more wives than anyone else. Coincidence? I'll let you connect those dots... 🤔

But seriously, let's talk numbers:
- War spoils? Check ✅
- Mandatory charitable contributions? Check ✅
- Political power? Double check ✅✅
- Special rules that only applied to him? Triple check ✅✅✅

The Questions Nobody's Asking 🤷‍♂️

1. How convenient was it that divine revelations often aligned perfectly with personal desires?
2. Why did the creator of the universe care so much about Muhammad's dinner guests overstaying their welcome? (Yes, there's literally a verse about that)
3. How did someone go from being financially dependent to having an entire economic system revolving around them?

The Raw Truth 🎯

This isn't just a rags-to-riches story - it's a masterclass in building power and influence. From being unable to marry into certain families to becoming the most powerful man in Arabia, the transformation is mind-blowing. And the best part? It was all done under the banner of divine authority.

Think About It 🧠

- Before: Couldn't get approved for marriage by some families
- After: Had divine permission to marry more women than anyone else
- Before: Working for his wife's business
- After: Running an entire state with its own economic system
- Before: Regular merchant
- After: Political leader, military commander, and religious figure all in one

The Takeaway 💡

Whether you believe in divine intervention or not, you can't deny this is one of the most fascinating transformations in history. A man went from being an employee to essentially running an empire - all while claiming it wasn't about the money or power at all.

But hey, don't take my word for it. Look at the historical facts, connect the dots, and ask yourself: Was this the greatest career change in history, or the greatest business plan ever conceived?

What do you think? Did Muhammad stumble upon the perfect business model, or was it all just a coincidence that everything worked out so perfectly in his favor? 🤔

Let me know if you want me to dive deeper into any of these aspects - there's plenty more where this came from!

#RealTalk #HistoricalFacts #CriticalThinking #NoFilter

1 year ago | [YT] | 1