🎥 Greg Owen | Smart Commentary on Media, Culture & Storytelling
Where media analysis meets cultural sanity.
I’m Greg — a nerdy dad of 6 turned cultural commentator, here to help you decode what’s actually going on in movies, TV, games, and the larger entertainment machine. If you’ve ever watched something and thought, “Wait…Why don't I like this [Media Product]?” - you’re in the right place.
I dive deep into:
đź§ Why modern storytelling feels empty (and how we got here)
🕵️‍♂️ Woke Hollywood, identity politics & performative allyship
🎮 Games & adaptations that don’t insult your intelligence
📚 Philosophy, storytelling tropes, and how media shapes belief
🤣 Plus: sarcasm, memes, and occasional dad jokes
If you miss smart, character-driven stories and want sharp, funny commentary that cuts through the noise, subscribe and join a community that still values good writing and real human connection.
📍Member streams include collaborative outlines & behind-the-scenes input.
Greg Owen
Come hang out with us tonight to discuss the very bizarre Digger, Other Mommy, and the Stephen Colbert LOTR that will not be.
4:30pm central!
6 days ago |[YT] | 17
View 0 replies
Greg Owen
2nd tier channel members (Share Oweners) now have a private Discord, The Owener's Box!
Come chat with fellow channel watchers, as well as getting previews of future videos and the thought process behind them.
I hope to see you in chat!
1 week ago |[YT] | 64
View 2 replies
Greg Owen
Warner Bros can eat a bag* of dicks. Here is Despot's THIRD try at keeping this video up. The last one got claimed for clips that were literally 2 seconds long. Give it a watch and a hype
* perhaps not large enough. WB needs to consume a barrel, or bushel, or even a barge of dicks.
I didn't cover Lanterns, partly because I just didn't care to watch it, but also because making videos about any Warner product is nearly impossible.
1 week ago |[YT] | 238
View 20 replies
Greg Owen
Great video about the way our need for critique changes how we view something.
While excellent points are made, I must also say that we, the audience, are not at fault for viewing everything in a political light when the creators openly brag about putting their politics in the production. See the recent Lanterns writer interview about how racism was at the front of their minds at all times.
Beyond that, there is the question of critique's/commentary's place in how we experience art. While it may be true that we overanalyze some things (especially if a video needs to get made), the converse doesn't seem to hold much meaning. Art without reflection quickly becomes hedonistic brainrot. Don't think, just consume/enjoy.
What I took most was to frame more critiques in how they affect me or might affect you, rather than attempting to say definitively what the piece "really means". In many ways, the audience reaction is more important than what the creator wants, anyway. See Alan Moore and Rorschach.
Anyway, great video with a lot to think about, which is a mark of success
2 weeks ago |[YT] | 61
View 7 replies
Greg Owen
Round 2, hopefully copyright avoidant! If you watched yesterday, and you have a few minutes, would you mind watching again? YouTube's algorithm push will treat this like a brand new video, sadly.
Hopefully WB is happier with this version.
Sorry Supergirl bombed, but how about not claiming my video?
1 month ago |[YT] | 96
View 8 replies
Greg Owen
Member stream tonight for Share Owener members!
I have an extremely special guest, my oldest kid, who honestly has better media opinions than I do, I’m just a pretty face. Come hang out!
Thurs, Sep 3, 6pm central
1 month ago |[YT] | 1
View 0 replies
Greg Owen
"I'll tell you what we're gonna do. We're gonna face a series of escalating challenges until we finally take on the big bad"
I almost couldn't finish the trailer, because I was doubled over with hysterical laughter from this fresh new comedic angle of making fun of tropes from old properties. My goodness, where do these genius writers come up with these hilarious lines?
1 month ago |[YT] | 57
View 13 replies
Greg Owen
I STRONGLY recommend this game.
I stumbled on a demo during the Steam Next Fest and absolutely loved it, so I bought it on release last week. It's a love letter to Spyro, Kingdom Hearts, Crash Bandicoot, and every other ps2 era action platformer you loved.
It plays smoothly, has a great art style, and is overall just extremely fun to play.
Bonus: that little bird you see in the picture does follow you around, but does NOT say "hey!" over and over.
1 month ago |[YT] | 33
View 10 replies
Greg Owen
Interesting video here. Are the channels you watch getting longer? Do you like it, or is it getting to be too much?
I clicked this one, because I was already thinking about it, and this guy is pointing straight at me.
My own videos have gotten a bit longer, but why?
For me, I think it’s a matter of wanting to make 110% of a point. That means examples, historical background, some personal anecdotes, etc. A ten minute video is a good primer, but I always feel like there was more detail that could have, and likely should have, been added to make the point better. Why pique the viewers interest and then just gloss over the topic?
After I make a video, my number one regret is being misunderstood. Being disagreed with is cool, as long as it’s me being disagreed with and not a different point I wasn’t really trying to make.
The trouble is finding the line between adequate and too much. For example, in last week’s video, I brought up the Ford v Dodge case, because Shareholder Primacy was important to the overall argument. In an effort to keep that segment short and focused on the results of the ruling, I left out the bits about the Dodge brothers using dividends to fund their competing company. Now, looking back, that would have taken about 60 seconds or less to explain and probably wouldn’t have dragged the pace down. But would it have improved the video? Is the video worse off for having excluded it? I’m still not sure. And it’s one of a dozen things I cut from that script, which was originally closer to 50+ minutes long. Each thing is a little add, but collectively they make an hour long video.
It’s a fun challenge, but a challenge nonetheless, to parse out what are important details that will inform the viewer and hold their interest, but not so much that other viewers will get bored.
One solution is to talk about a subject or theme in multiple videos, giving it multiple passes from different angles. However, this relies on the viewer watching all of them to get the full picture, which you can’t always expect.
Second example. I actually cut some of last week’s video after publishing. Toward the beginning, there was a listing of various ways things have become enshittified. It was about 80 seconds long. The thing is, if you clicked on this video, you almost certainly have your own examples and agree that things are getting shittier, so that segment didn’t add to the argument. BUT, most viewers likely agreed with all of it, so the argument could be made that leaving it in is fine, because the viewer is engaged via agreement.
It’s a never ending puzzle. Fortunately, I love puzzles
1 month ago (edited) |[YT] | 68
View 45 replies
Load more