Welcome to my channel, where criminal justice meets the real world!
This channel is designed for students, future criminal justice professionals, and anyone interested in understanding crime, investigations, law enforcement, and the justice system.
Here, you'll find easy-to-follow lectures, criminal investigation concepts, real-world case examples, and discussions that connect what you have read about criminal justice to what actually happens in the field.
Topics may include:
🔎 Criminal Investigations
⚖️ Criminal Justice & the Courts
🚔 Law Enforcement
🧬 Forensic Evidence
📁 Real-World Criminal Cases
📚 Study Tips & Course Concepts
🧠 Crime, Motive & Investigative Thinking
Whether you're studying criminal justice or simply fascinated by how investigations work, there’s something here for you.
Subscribe and learn criminal justice with Professor Diaz.
TikTok : @TheRealProfessorDiaz
The Criminology Classroom
Clansy Case: Check Your Knowledge Question
Lindsay reportedly disclosed thoughts of harming her children weeks before the killings. Does that alone prove she was criminally responsible on January 24?
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
The Criminology Classroom
Clansy Case: Check Your Knowledge Question
What is a stipulation in a criminal trial?
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
The Criminology Classroom
Clansy Case: Check Your Knowledge Question
Why is Clancy's mental-health history before January 24 relevant?
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
The Criminology Classroom
Clansy Case: Check Your Knowledge Question
What is the central legal question the jury must decide?
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
The Criminology Classroom
Clansy Case: Check Your Knowledge Question
If expert witnesses disagree about whether a defendant was criminally responsible, who ultimately makes the decision?
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
The Criminology Classroom
An investigator believes that Marcus committed a burglary because Marcus previously worked at the business. The investigator then interviews employees but focuses primarily on statements that make Marcus look suspicious. When one employee says Marcus was seen near the business that night, the investigator treats this as strong evidence. The investigator pays little attention to another employee who says Marcus was seen elsewhere at the time of the burglary.
Which concept best explains the investigator's behavior?
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies