TechTalkTV

Samsung Galaxy XR is now official. The first-ever Android XR headset, built to take on the Apple Vision Pro but at half the price.
• 4K Micro-OLED displays (3,552 × 3,840 per eye, 90Hz)
• Powered by Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2
• AI powered by Google Gemini
• 16gb ram & 256gb storage
• 12 cameras with iris recognition
• Dual stereo speakers + 6 mics
• Up to 2.5 hours of video playback
• Weighs 545 grams
• $1,799
Pre-orders are live now with a FREE explorer pack worth $1140 -howl.link/ufv4hvj18sopr

1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 575



@DoozyyTV

These headsets are gonna flop all of them, glasses are the only thing that have a future

1 month ago | 24

@drestrick3899

I think glasses will be the ones that stick, headsets seem to give the feeling of being cut off from the world and not being to be aware of your surroundings

1 month ago | 17

@gustopherdanso

Broo where's the G Trifold

1 month ago | 5

@Ryker-yc2kf

Imagine having prescription glasses to help see and trying to use these—guess these are only made for people who don’t need glasses unless you wanna pay another premium

1 month ago (edited) | 0

@thulashipuramarun

All these XR Headsets will cater to a small set of people's where this is helpful, For a day to day usage and media consumption these needs to be portable enough, light weight and shouldn't create any problem to eyes on a long run

1 month ago | 0

@jts4248

Hell yeah bro

1 month ago | 0

@simeon77

In 3-5 years I think this will be done through glasses and it will have better quality, better AI and it might be cheaper as well.

1 month ago (edited) | 0

@iiiiiiiii99

Still it need to be lower in price like meta quest 3

1 month ago | 0

@blacklyfe6881

Why do they call it XR? What does XR stand for? What is the "X"?

1 month ago | 0

@ahernandez4695

Lmaooo I can buy a couple of Metas for that price

1 month ago | 0

@nathanielalaburgDelhi

Two questions What do you get with the explorer pack? And tech wise aside from the Chip is it the same as the vision pro

1 month ago | 0

@josephcarr1482

I mean, technically galaxy second VR headset. But you know who cares lol

1 month ago | 0

@srinivasg6268

Hey sal

1 month ago | 0

@DanielSON8721

Waste of money and resources

1 month ago (edited) | 5

@Obito-3dits

This is actually good. Better then Vision Pro which is like $2500+

1 month ago | 13  

@mehemynxm6974

I still view it as too much money. If someone is uncertain about vr they aren't gonna spend near $2k to try it out. And if they already have one, again, $2k on top of what they've already spent. While it's nice that it's cheaper than apple, the quest 3 exists and is faaaaaar cheaper and already supported. Maybe it's performance will be amazing or something, but untill I see benchmarks this feels useless

1 month ago | 0

@RANGERDANGERTX

i really don’t like the fact you can’t customize the headstrap. i’m out. i’m sure there will be a couple things im missing out on. especially with the screens. it just seems like the jack of all trades master of none. if i didn’t see cushion marks on testers foreheads i’d be more inclined. i’m gonna pass on this first generation.

1 month ago | 0

@TheMinecraftAddict

$1799 aren’t bad I might look into this. At least Samsung care about people wanting to buy VR for a cheap price. Apple in the other hand doesn’t care about anyone but themselves

1 month ago | 1

@weekendwarrior8179

2 hour battery life????

1 month ago | 0  

@Regal-Black

the only problem is the Processor how can this compete with the M5 😅

1 month ago | 1