CAN PARTICLE PHYSICS AND THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY COINCIDE) "Yes! They can. Starting off with an explanation of what we are looking at, to which I can only say NGC691 is a major find, and demonstrates exactly how these DENSER STIRRERS do what they do. Black holes are created when stars die or when gas collapses into a spiral with just enough mass. For a long time now astronomers, physicists, and cosmologists have long thought that the brightness of a galaxy suggests how fast it's spinning, being that everything is calculated using light, which is limited, and subject to constant VECTOR changes albeit with displacement from big dense masses, curved by container shapes including our sun, an energy reservoir, or a black hole, an energy sink. But essentially big densities of mass like our sun, one solar mass, the standard candle, can either produce the release of energy through fusion, or collapse once their main sources of supply have been exhausted. Oddly enough, all you need is a little bit more than a standard candle to do some interesting things. When silicates and then iron are pressurized to the point where NEUTRON DEGENERACY takes hold, watch out, because that means the SUBATOMIC PARTICLES inside are going through a relativistic change, a change of state never produced here on earth, under the weight of 3-4 or 10 solar masses a black hole begins when the swarthschild radius has been compromised, and now too much mass has been packed so tightly that it goes supernova and drives a BOSON RICH NUCLEUS into a new nucleus, something inescapable, impenetrable, an insulator of unmeasurable resistance to pressure, something that cannot take on heat, and won't allow anything to pierce it, move it, or destroy it. I'm talking about a supermassive black hole. Absolute zero temperature inside, all molecular motion seizes, for all intensive purposes, we now have the densest stirrer possible. If you think about a fan, it has curved fins that scoop air, and deliver pressure, but on the back side there's a suction pressure, in space you usually have no resistance, no mass or matter to touch, give off heat too quickly, and because the vacuum is empty of curvature, it's very flat. You can travel in a straight line, and because of the conservation of angular momentum, anything that gets bumped transfers that power to whatever it touches. With black holes, like in the center of that bright spot up top, you have somewhere near 4 or 5 million solar masses packed in there, and so that not only has direct displacement properties like lift and spin, but thermodynamic properties like zero entropy. A superfluid is something that offers no viscosity, no breakdown of its components, no friction or electricity can flow, you can't shine light because it's too dense for motion. Some believe all the mass is transferred to a singularity, but if that's the case, why would they gain in volume and size no, to me they definitely get bigger because they're jacking up space in every direction from that gaausian curvature. If you or I, or any other mass approached one of them, you'd get spaghettified, stretched out from being sent on a geodesic path, a straight path in a curved environment. This is why objects orbit one another, they're in constant motion, flying around a curved space, in an exaggerated frame of reference. Ever pour out fluid? Lean it to one side or the other? Notice how it chases the low point, and fills up the empty shape and levels off in a corner? How about have you used a drill? When you fall in or Infalling matter finds its way into a black hole, it finds a curved pathway and catches an acceleration, depending on how dense the mass, that speed will increase, this has to do with thermodynamic pressure, as with anything falling into a black hole, or gravity bringing down storm water upside down in Antarctica, we are being accelerated on a curve, which amounts to being constantly lifted mathematically. Ever see a waiter balance his tray while walking fast? He might even tip the tray slightly sideways, but as long as he moves it fast enough, he can keep it locked onto the tray, and nothing falls off? Ok, now picture the 1/4th of the earth, we'll concentrate on one quarter at a time to isolate this, but I've heard YouTubers telling people that because of TIME DILATION your head and feet are on different time scales, and therefore when you fall from a gravitational anomaly it's really just time having its way with you. This is a misconception because according to Einstein, gravity is an effect of acceleration in a moving frame while in a curved environment or TIME SPACE. If you move through space fast you live through time slower. But Instead of thinking that the earth being accelerated upwards at 9.8 meters squared or 118 MPH means, anything falling in must be getting scooped up by the earth, and therefore freefall itself is the time space coming up, and you aren't moving anywhere. Big big no no. Anything falling in is really falling INWARDS not down necessarily. The earths motions, all of them throw us on a curved wave, especially our earths spin which is intensified by the solar, galactic and intergalactic orbits, means that not only are you falling down a spinning hill that has no lift energy, but you are too dense to be displaced way up there, where particles are escaping when heated, energy needs to be bottlenecked in order to produce lift. A rocket ship for instance takes off on a straight path, but as it travels through space and time, it looks like a big curved arc to an outside observer, but the total proof that when you drop something, or a black hole collapses matter into its accretion disc and eventually it's event horizon, the motion you see is no different than a screw going into wood, the energy and mass densities might be different, gradients are contrasting more or less, but if the earth is spinning in one direction and you have enough force to escape the atmosphere, your fall back in is the reverse of that, the opposite actually. So falling in is just like drilling a screw in with weight, pressure, displacing the wood, creating a screw hole in the process, gravity is our screw hole. It's the only way a big dense mass can steal your motion, absorb you, subject you to friction and a collapse into a sturdier container, our surface. Everything in space works that way, and galaxy cores are the pump, that lifts the disc and controls it. Anything heated, moving, charged up, or clumpy enough will fall in by orbiting and eventually it comes down, but it's a true curved collapse. The time space CANNOT come up at every side of the earth or any other gigantic mass, so instead picture the 32 feet per second decline towards our planet as fluid pouring in on a slant. If we poured liquid down a leaned ramp theres no way for the earth to come up and scoop it, not to mention but that would make storms very difficult to explain indeed. Storms in Antarctica need to be able to dump fluid and snow whilst the entire frame exits stage left taking you and I, and everything else with it. When things fall from gravity, what you're seeing is MASS that was being flown, accelerated, dumping in from having no more means to accelerate them. In other words, it's a long arc curved fall seen instantly, being that without great height, you can't appreciate THE WHY. Why things fall in has everything to do with how fast heat can propel you, beyond our regular accelerations, rocket power is just like releasing a bottle rocket, the fall downwards, the 9.8 meters squared anomaly we call falling in, is matter in a clump displacing lighter masses as it searches for a container shape. Partly thermodynamics, because if you can't produce the integrity of the masses temperature you see it sublimate or boil off. So you need the container ability, either by atmospheric pressure holding it together stable, or you need a displacement, a hole, a low point, a curvature. You and I are being thrown on a whopper curve, our weight has collapsed, and the conservation of angular momentum has ensured that nothing was lost. Now, if you use MORE ENERGY than the time frame produces for us, you're merely adding F=ma force is equal to mass times acceleration, and with black holes, all we need to know if they're real and present is, the gravitational constant, the mass, and the speed of light to derive a hypothetical.
JKD MERIT MASTER GROUP
CAN PARTICLE PHYSICS AND THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY COINCIDE) "Yes! They can. Starting off with an explanation of what we are looking at, to which I can only say NGC691 is a major find, and demonstrates exactly how these DENSER STIRRERS do what they do. Black holes are created when stars die or when gas collapses into a spiral with just enough mass. For a long time now astronomers, physicists, and cosmologists have long thought that the brightness of a galaxy suggests how fast it's spinning, being that everything is calculated using light, which is limited, and subject to constant VECTOR changes albeit with displacement from big dense masses, curved by container shapes including our sun, an energy reservoir, or a black hole, an energy sink. But essentially big densities of mass like our sun, one solar mass, the standard candle, can either produce the release of energy through fusion, or collapse once their main sources of supply have been exhausted. Oddly enough, all you need is a little bit more than a standard candle to do some interesting things. When silicates and then iron are pressurized to the point where NEUTRON DEGENERACY takes hold, watch out, because that means the SUBATOMIC PARTICLES inside are going through a relativistic change, a change of state never produced here on earth, under the weight of 3-4 or 10 solar masses a black hole begins when the swarthschild radius has been compromised, and now too much mass has been packed so tightly that it goes supernova and drives a BOSON RICH NUCLEUS into a new nucleus, something inescapable, impenetrable, an insulator of unmeasurable resistance to pressure, something that cannot take on heat, and won't allow anything to pierce it, move it, or destroy it. I'm talking about a supermassive black hole. Absolute zero temperature inside, all molecular motion seizes, for all intensive purposes, we now have the densest stirrer possible. If you think about a fan, it has curved fins that scoop air, and deliver pressure, but on the back side there's a suction pressure, in space you usually have no resistance, no mass or matter to touch, give off heat too quickly, and because the vacuum is empty of curvature, it's very flat. You can travel in a straight line, and because of the conservation of angular momentum, anything that gets bumped transfers that power to whatever it touches. With black holes, like in the center of that bright spot up top, you have somewhere near 4 or 5 million solar masses packed in there, and so that not only has direct displacement properties like lift and spin, but thermodynamic properties like zero entropy. A superfluid is something that offers no viscosity, no breakdown of its components, no friction or electricity can flow, you can't shine light because it's too dense for motion. Some believe all the mass is transferred to a singularity, but if that's the case, why would they gain in volume and size no, to me they definitely get bigger because they're jacking up space in every direction from that gaausian curvature. If you or I, or any other mass approached one of them, you'd get spaghettified, stretched out from being sent on a geodesic path, a straight path in a curved environment. This is why objects orbit one another, they're in constant motion, flying around a curved space, in an exaggerated frame of reference. Ever pour out fluid? Lean it to one side or the other? Notice how it chases the low point, and fills up the empty shape and levels off in a corner? How about have you used a drill? When you fall in or Infalling matter finds its way into a black hole, it finds a curved pathway and catches an acceleration, depending on how dense the mass, that speed will increase, this has to do with thermodynamic pressure, as with anything falling into a black hole, or gravity bringing down storm water upside down in Antarctica, we are being accelerated on a curve, which amounts to being constantly lifted mathematically. Ever see a waiter balance his tray while walking fast? He might even tip the tray slightly sideways, but as long as he moves it fast enough, he can keep it locked onto the tray, and nothing falls off? Ok, now picture the 1/4th of the earth, we'll concentrate on one quarter at a time to isolate this, but I've heard YouTubers telling people that because of TIME DILATION your head and feet are on different time scales, and therefore when you fall from a gravitational anomaly it's really just time having its way with you. This is a misconception because according to Einstein, gravity is an effect of acceleration in a moving frame while in a curved environment or TIME SPACE. If you move through space fast you live through time slower. But Instead of thinking that the earth being accelerated upwards at 9.8 meters squared or 118 MPH means, anything falling in must be getting scooped up by the earth, and therefore freefall itself is the time space coming up, and you aren't moving anywhere. Big big no no. Anything falling in is really falling INWARDS not down necessarily. The earths motions, all of them throw us on a curved wave, especially our earths spin which is intensified by the solar, galactic and intergalactic orbits, means that not only are you falling down a spinning hill that has no lift energy, but you are too dense to be displaced way up there, where particles are escaping when heated, energy needs to be bottlenecked in order to produce lift. A rocket ship for instance takes off on a straight path, but as it travels through space and time, it looks like a big curved arc to an outside observer, but the total proof that when you drop something, or a black hole collapses matter into its accretion disc and eventually it's event horizon, the motion you see is no different than a screw going into wood, the energy and mass densities might be different, gradients are contrasting more or less, but if the earth is spinning in one direction and you have enough force to escape the atmosphere, your fall back in is the reverse of that, the opposite actually. So falling in is just like drilling a screw in with weight, pressure, displacing the wood, creating a screw hole in the process, gravity is our screw hole. It's the only way a big dense mass can steal your motion, absorb you, subject you to friction and a collapse into a sturdier container, our surface. Everything in space works that way, and galaxy cores are the pump, that lifts the disc and controls it. Anything heated, moving, charged up, or clumpy enough will fall in by orbiting and eventually it comes down, but it's a true curved collapse. The time space CANNOT come up at every side of the earth or any other gigantic mass, so instead picture the 32 feet per second decline towards our planet as fluid pouring in on a slant. If we poured liquid down a leaned ramp theres no way for the earth to come up and scoop it, not to mention but that would make storms very difficult to explain indeed. Storms in Antarctica need to be able to dump fluid and snow whilst the entire frame exits stage left taking you and I, and everything else with it. When things fall from gravity, what you're seeing is MASS that was being flown, accelerated, dumping in from having no more means to accelerate them. In other words, it's a long arc curved fall seen instantly, being that without great height, you can't appreciate THE WHY. Why things fall in has everything to do with how fast heat can propel you, beyond our regular accelerations, rocket power is just like releasing a bottle rocket, the fall downwards, the 9.8 meters squared anomaly we call falling in, is matter in a clump displacing lighter masses as it searches for a container shape. Partly thermodynamics, because if you can't produce the integrity of the masses temperature you see it sublimate or boil off. So you need the container ability, either by atmospheric pressure holding it together stable, or you need a displacement, a hole, a low point, a curvature. You and I are being thrown on a whopper curve, our weight has collapsed, and the conservation of angular momentum has ensured that nothing was lost. Now, if you use MORE ENERGY than the time frame produces for us, you're merely adding F=ma force is equal to mass times acceleration, and with black holes, all we need to know if they're real and present is, the gravitational constant, the mass, and the speed of light to derive a hypothetical.
1 month ago | [YT] | 2