If your epic prank is to pretend to be a moron, you're a moron.
2 weeks ago | 85
Russell and Whitehead after hundreds of pages of carefully argued logic and set theory “1+1=2 The above proposition is occasionally useful” Principia Mathematica Vol II
2 weeks ago | 45
One thing I know about teachers is they have a hard time admitting a mistake. I think there's a tiniest chance here that he's lying to save face...
2 weeks ago | 26
This woke era has been insanity and it’s evil. It’s holding blacks back and mutilating and sterilizing children and promoting destructive ideas for people and society. All these fools are being played by elites who use them as pawns for control by dividing and conquering. Even the ardent socialists don’t even realize they are falling for this deception and are being used by the very powerful people they claim to hate. The elites want socialism. They already have all the money in the world. So they move on to power. They’re megalomaniacs and now want control over everyone.
2 weeks ago | 23
“Like a maniac shooting flaming arrows of death is one who deceives their neighbor and says, “I was only joking!”” Proverbs 26:18-19
2 weeks ago | 19
Challenge him right back, to "prove it from first principles" now.
2 weeks ago | 15
That guy is a disgrace. Speeds years gaslighting us. Now, "It was a joke, bruh!" 😑 We can't let these people get away with " I never meant any of it "
2 weeks ago | 59
He has met the steep qualifications to work at NASA. “Are you a weasel?” “Yes” “Your hired”
2 weeks ago | 4
Of course they didn’t believe it. Sociopaths lie like normal people breathe.
2 weeks ago | 2
Let IRS send her a notice that she owes 4000 in taxes, and when she pays, let them send her a notice that she still owes a 1000. That will jolt her memory, and she will get her proof.
2 weeks ago | 1
To prove that 2 + 2 = 4 from first principles, we must strip away our intuition about numbers and rely on a formal set of rules known as the Peano Axioms. These axioms form the foundational logic for natural numbers arithmetic. Here is the step-by-step proof. 1. The Definitions First, we must define what numbers actually are and how the operation of addition works. The Successor Function In this system, numbers are defined by a "successor function," denoted as S(n). This function simply gives you the "next" number. * 0 is the base number. * 1 is defined as the successor of 0: * 2 is defined as the successor of 1: * 3 is defined as the successor of 2: * 4 is defined as the successor of 3: The Definition of Addition Addition (+) is defined recursively using two fundamental rules: * The Base Rule: Adding zero to any number changes nothing. * The Recursion Rule: Adding a successor implies moving the successor "outside" the parentheses. 2. The Proof We want to find the value of 2 + 2. Step 1: Expand the second number By our definition of the number 2, we know that 2 = S(1). We substitute this into our equation: Step 2: Apply the Recursion Rule Now we use the second rule of addition (a + S(b) = S(a + b)). Here, a = 2 and b = 1. Step 3: Expand the number 1 We need to resolve the 2 + 1 inside the parentheses. We know that 1 = S(0). Step 4: Apply the Recursion Rule (Again) We apply the addition rule again to the expression inside the parentheses. This time a = 2 and b = 0. Step 5: Apply the Base Rule Now we have 2 + 0 inside the inner parentheses. By the first rule of addition (a + 0 = a), we know that 2 + 0 = 2. Step 6: Convert back to Integers Now we just have to translate the Successor function back into the numbers we named earlier. * We know that S(2) is defined as 3. * We know that S(3) is defined as 4. > Therefore, 2 + 2 = 4. >
2 weeks ago | 42
But for all the kids that ate it up and tried building reality out of it. Here we are.
2 weeks ago | 3
I'd love too see one of these wokesters be honest and not just shamelessly backpedal out of the insanity they used to believe lx)
2 weeks ago | 6
According to the Great leader of North Korea 1+1 = 1. A rain drop + a rain drop = a bigger rain drop...
1 week ago | 0
Like a maniac shooting flaming arrows of death is one who deceives their neighbor and says, “I was only joking! Proverbs 26:18-19 NIV
2 weeks ago | 0
Peter Boghossian
Kareem was kidding, everyone! 2+2 =/=5!
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 600